https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110631
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 55600
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55600&action=edit
Proposed fix
Here is a proposed fix - which will be applied (if/when) bootstrapping
completes successfully.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #7 from AlexK ---
Created attachment 55601
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55601&action=edit
applyed patch for Makefile.in to configure with --enable-shared and without
--enable-static options
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #8 from AlexK ---
Created attachment 55602
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55602&action=edit
applyed patch for libgcc/Makefile.in to make shared library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #9 from AlexK ---
Created attachment 55603
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55603&action=edit
applyed patch for libiberty/Makefile.in to make shared library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #10 from AlexK ---
Created attachment 55604
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55604&action=edit
applyed patch for libdecnumber/Makefile.in to make shared library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #11 from AlexK ---
Created attachment 55605
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55605&action=edit
applyed patch for libcody/Makefile.in to make shared library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #12 from AlexK ---
Created attachment 55606
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55606&action=edit
applyed patch for libbacktrace/Makefile.in to make shared library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #13 from AlexK ---
Created attachment 55607
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55607&action=edit
applyed patch for libcpp/Makefile.in to make shared library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #14 from AlexK ---
Created attachment 55608
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55608&action=edit
applyed patch for gcc/Makefile.in to make shared library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #15 from AlexK ---
I have attached all patches I have made to several Makefile.in in different
folders (I created them with `diff` tool)
after that I made building directory:
installdir=/tools/gcc-12.2.0
install -v -d mybuild
cd myb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #7 from Aurelien Jarno ---
Created attachment 55609
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55609&action=edit
crtbeginT.o GCC 12 version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #8 from Aurelien Jarno ---
Created attachment 55610
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55610&action=edit
crtbeginT.o GCC 12 version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #9 from Aurelien Jarno ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Can you try reverting r13-923-g2d546ff69455f7deadab and try GCC 13 again?
Yep, I'll do that, but it will probably take some time to get the results.
(In reply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109921
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Excellent, thanks for checking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110631
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73cc6ce1294ec35e9322b1bbc91009cfc76f732b
commit r14-2725-g73cc6ce1294ec35e9322b1bbc91009cfc76f732b
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110631
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110174
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110775
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebastian.huber@embedded-br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110757
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lili.cui at intel dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #10 from Aurelien Jarno ---
(In reply to Aurelien Jarno from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > Can you try reverting r13-923-g2d546ff69455f7deadab and try GCC 13 again?
>
> Yep, I'll do that, but it will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110766
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #11 from Aurelien Jarno ---
I have bisected the issue, and I found it has been introduced by the following
commit:
commit 3cd08f7168c196d7a481b9ed9f4289fd1f14eea8
Author: Andreas Schwab
Date: Wed Jan 25 12:00:09 2023 +0100
r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110772
--- Comment #5 from Roland Illig ---
Sorry for the confusing description. Let me try again.
NetBSD lint includes a yacc parser for C code. This parser contains the rules
'block_item_list' and 'block_item':
https://github.com/NetBSD/src/blob/7e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110772
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55598|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110772
--- Comment #7 from Roland Illig ---
Created attachment 55612
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55612&action=edit
Preprocessed source from comment 5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #12 from Aurelien Jarno ---
Backtrace with debug symbols in libgcc_eh.a:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
classify_object_over_fdes (ob=0xe2da0 , this_fde=0x1000530e6,
range=0x3ff310) at ../../../gcc/libgcc/u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110776
Bug ID: 110776
Summary: [14 Regression] powerpc-darwin bootstrap broken after
r14-2490 with ICE rs6000.cc:5069 building libgfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110741
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2)
> It exposed one issue on xxeval output vsx operands' format, can be fixed
> with:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
> index 0c269e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110776
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 55613
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55613&action=edit
preprocessed (not reduced, but the function is not large)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110772
--- Comment #8 from Roland Illig ---
When I compile the attached code with "ARM GCC 10.5.0" and "-O2 -fPIE -ftrapv"
on godbolt.org, the generated code is correct (you can search for "#327" in the
output and then go back one branch).
The code ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[RISC-V] Segment f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55614
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55614&action=edit
patch for someone to test out
The problem is the similar across many targets so I basically copied what was
d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110766
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code seems to be:
template struct _Base_bitset {
unsigned long _M_w[_Nw];
unsigned long &_M_getword() { return _M_w[0]; }
};
struct bitset : _Base_bitset<0> {
int _Unchecked_set___val
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110677
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #15 from Aurelien Jarno ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #14)
> Created attachment 55614 [details]
> patch for someone to test out
>
> The problem is the similar across many targets so I basically copied what
> was done f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Aurelien Jarno from comment #15)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #14)
> > Created attachment 55614 [details]
> > patch for someone to test out
> >
> > The problem is the similar acro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #17 from Andreas Schwab ---
I don't think you need -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #18 from Aurelien Jarno ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #17)
> I don't think you need -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
I confirm that CRTSTUFF_T_CFLAGS += -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
-fno-unwind-tables is enough to fix the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #19 from Andreas Schwab ---
Probably also needed for aarch64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110433
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Indeed, the error is no longer reported. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110777
Bug ID: 110777
Summary: ice: SSA corruption
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: una
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110777
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ice: SSA corruption |[14 Regression] ice: SSA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110777
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Is this reduced from some other code? Because the testcase here depends on an
uninitialized variable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110777
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 55615
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55615&action=edit
C source code
Original pre-reduction source code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110777
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Attempting bisection. Trying g:85a4e4f93ff251f2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110777
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Current range seems to be g:23ad5ed7432bea7c to g:85a4e4f93ff251f2.
Trying g:b6b72562d116bd0a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110777
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110777
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110755
--- Comment #7 from Aurelien Jarno ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Created attachment 55594 [details]
> gcc14-pr110755.patch
>
> Untested patch.
Thanks for the patch, I confirm it works as expected, now the result is a
positi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110778
Bug ID: 110778
Summary: Alpha targets broken since r14-2587-gd8105b10fff951
(undefined reference to extended_count)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #19)
> Probably also needed for aarch64.
Testing that and will submit both patches after that finishes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110778
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Summary|Alpha targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110778
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:659d856e1d424ea8ef634844a7bd08b86ec7344b
commit r14-2729-g659d856e1d424ea8ef634844a7bd08b86ec7344b
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110778
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110533
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8125b12f846b41f26e58c0fe3b218d654f65d1c8
commit r14-2730-g8125b12f846b41f26e58c0fe3b218d654f65d1c8
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Sat J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110587
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8125b12f846b41f26e58c0fe3b218d654f65d1c8
commit r14-2730-g8125b12f846b41f26e58c0fe3b218d654f65d1c8
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vineet Gupta :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ecfa870ff29d979bd2c3d411643b551f2b6915b0
commit r14-2731-gecfa870ff29d979bd2c3d411643b551f2b6915b0
Author: Vineet Gupta
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100864
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107737
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
So far gimplify_vla_decl does not set the location on the call expression it
creates. It should be set to the same as the decl source location.
Testing that ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107737
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
A C++ front-end does not set the call for deconstructor for the following
testcase:
```
struct s{ ~s(); };
void f()
{
s{};
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110769
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbc1a102735c72e3c5a4dede8ab382813d12b058
commit r14-2733-gbbc1a102735c72e3c5a4dede8ab382813d12b058
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110066
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.3.0, 14.0
Summary|[13/14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110588
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
66 matches
Mail list logo
