https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58303d42809f0e01f23262f592d37943f7703f71
commit r14-2635-g58303d42809f0e01f23262f592d37943f7703f71
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0b0c21152b337bc9a8ef3a72a15c8dcdff1d847
commit r14-2636-gf0b0c21152b337bc9a8ef3a72a15c8dcdff1d847
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f07136af570b145fe0df6b142defc9558998bf53
commit r14-2637-gf07136af570b145fe0df6b142defc9558998bf53
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This should be fixed now, and you should see these in libstdc++.sum
PASS: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversions/char/stod.cc (test for excess
errors)
PASS: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #16)
> PASS: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversions/char/stoll.cc (test for
> excess errors)
> PASS: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversions/char/stoll.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110708
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52bfec7ea0eb0f1a4c5bfa55b0d6b9b6c8808e26
commit r14-2638-g52bfec7ea0eb0f1a4c5bfa55b0d6b9b6c8808e26
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110708
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110719
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110719
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> It would be useful to profile std::format with and without std::time_get, to
s/time_get/time_put/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105910
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106760
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90348
maic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnu.ojxq8 at dralias dot com
--- Comment #29 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107719
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110738
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109661
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109876
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110739
Bug ID: 110739
Summary: std::format for chrono types compiles very slowly
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-time-hog
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110315
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110719
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4bce119f617dc4663fb43f55784908daf16b4b6
commit r14-2640-gf4bce119f617dc4663fb43f55784908daf16b4b6
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90348
--- Comment #30 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, gnu.ojxq8 at dralias dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90348
>
> maic changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110719
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> Should we consistently use std::time_put for all locale-specific output?
> Alternatively, we could use time_point_cast and duration_cast to round to
> second
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110739
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Ev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110731
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ece799607c841676f4e00c2fea98bbec6976da3f
commit r14-2642-gece799607c841676f4e00c2fea98bbec6976da3f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110731
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f76f411f2cdb62122322e709d503edd2f8e8a530
commit r13-7589-gf76f411f2cdb62122322e709d503edd2f8e8a530
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110739
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 55580
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55580&action=edit
Instantiate less code for chrono formatters, take 2
In this patch the converters like _S_date and _S_hms are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110700
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc -fanalyzer |ICE with -fanalyzer
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Yeah, the issue is that PRE figures out a new value here but we've already
> done value-numbering so we can't alter the "old" solution here. So what we
> do
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109543
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I think for SRA the issue is that there's no access to any of the unions
components and as Martin says it disqualifies total scalarization.
I think total scalarization would be possible if we can use the o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110740
Bug ID: 110740
Summary: [14 regression]
gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #18 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-07-19 6:10 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
>
> --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> This should be fixed now, and you s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #18)
> The stof.cc and stold.cc tests fail in try-catch.
Yes, my suggested patch in comment 12 was wrong, because it only set errno on
error and didn't throw an exce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110741
Bug ID: 110741
Summary: vec_ternarylogic intrinsic generates incorrect code on
POWER10 target when compiled with GCC
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110315
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Confirmed. Not sure whether it's possible to backport any of the stack
> usage reduction in ranger from trunk or whether it's other recursion
> limiting that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110197
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110712
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> this_2(D)->ap = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(ap_3(D));
>
> it looks odd since ap_3(D) is a is_gimple_reg but a struct[1] definitely
> would not. Maybe you are missing a de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110712
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #2)
> I think some extra errors during the D front-end codegen pass are likely the
> most appropriate thing to do here, as you say, such things are rejected by
> C/C++, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
Bug ID: 110742
Summary: [14 Regression] cc1plus ICE "Floating point exception"
during profiled bootstrap since commit 08b99fe8ad6
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #1 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 55584
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55584&action=edit
Preprocessed ira.cc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110719
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86b36e9f7e3839e923db2fda4962cd3faf2ea47b
commit r14-2646-g86b36e9f7e3839e923db2fda4962cd3faf2ea47b
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110743
Bug ID: 110743
Summary: Unexpected -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern behavior
with partial bitfields
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108402
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnd at linaro dot org
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110284
--- Comment #14 from Gaius Mulley ---
The first patch was pushed on 2023-06-18 and the second one hasn't been pushed
yet. It has been tested though - I'll re-test it against master and push.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |rtl-optimization
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
Keywords|ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110726
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf20b770d9aabb15faf2644b5e3106249cb175f3
commit r14-2648-gbf20b770d9aabb15faf2644b5e3106249cb175f3
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110726
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110252
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c79b49cd4fa742f7be739dd21fd2aa040cc1ba3
commit r14-2650-g8c79b49cd4fa742f7be739dd21fd2aa040cc1ba3
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110252
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110410
Bug 110410 depends on bug 110252, which changed state.
Bug 110252 Summary: [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2/3/s on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110252
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.0|---
Keywords|wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
Bug ID: 110744
Summary: [14 regression] cc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c fails after
r14-2267-gb8806f6ffbe72
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37722
Nick Desaulniers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndesaulniers at google dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110728
--- Comment #7 from Nick Desaulniers ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I suspect PR 91951 is the same really.
PR 91951 seems to be about a missing diagnostic dependent on optimization
level. This bug report is more so a questio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109558
--- Comment #1 from David Faust ---
v1 patch series for btf_decl_tag:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/624156.html
This also adds infrastructure which will be used for btf_type_tag.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I can reproduce this via a cross compiler:
./cc1plus t.ii -nostdinc -O2 -fprofile-generate -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
-march=armv8-a+simd -mfpu=neon-fp-armv8 -mfloat-abi=hard -mthumb
/home/thiago.bauerma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109558
--- Comment #2 from David Faust ---
Patches for btf_type_tag WIP, but DWARF for type_tags in certain cases is
incorrect seemingly due to PR debug/110439. I am still investigating.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110439
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109106
--- Comment #5 from Geoffrey ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> Thanks for filing this, and for the comments; marking it as a dup of PR
> 107017
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 107017 ***
Hi, David. I want
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110728
--- Comment #8 from John McCall ---
> Let me clarify. If GCC were change behavior of `asm goto` to
> invoke the destructor/cleanup function before the backwards edge
> of `asm goto`, I would submit a patch to clang to implement that
> behavior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91951
Nick Desaulniers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndesaulniers at google dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110725
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||14.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110731
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12 Regression]
|W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110634
Clément Léger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cleger at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110315
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Confirmed. Not sure whether it's possible to backport any of the stack
> usage reduction in ranger from trunk or whether it's other recursion
> limiting that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110593
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99832
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110566
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55585
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55585&action=edit
Reduced testcase
options required:
`-O2 -fprofile-generate-march=armv8-a+simd -mfpu=neon-fp-armv8
-mfloat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-19
Host|armv8l-un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Removed reference to g:08b99fe8ad6 in the summary since the ICE is in SLP and
just happens to be compiling the code that was changed with g:08b99fe8ad6 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110315
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #4)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > Confirmed. Not sure whether it's possible to backport any of the stack
> > usage reduction in ranger from tru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||14.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Backtrace and some debug:
Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.
0x01d00dd2 in multiple_p (a=2, b=0) at
../../gcc/poly-int.h:2123
2123 return a % b == 0;
(gdb) bt
#0 0x01
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110122
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33a84d438883b5d6616048636a5fc47f6dd4ed28
commit r13-7590-g33a84d438883b5d6616048636a5fc47f6dd4ed28
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110122
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101832
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101832
--- Comment #13 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
the fix has been committed into GCC14.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110315
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod ---
I think the difference is actually Aldys work to reduce the size of Value_Range
rather than other stack saving changes. I think I can make some adjustments so
that our usage of Value_Range are on leaf func
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110432
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61bf34d17473d611bb2695329808810dbd5af478
commit r13-7591-g61bf34d17473d611bb2695329808810dbd5af478
Author: Jonathan Wak
101 - 179 of 179 matches
Mail list logo