https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110432
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110387
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-19
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109921
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110535
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92f6240baf80f998ca6c1408c3ee09d5d2ae68d7
commit r13-7592-g92f6240baf80f998ca6c1408c3ee09d5d2ae68d7
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110284
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01f6e8b013237041adeac370f8d229aea6304591
commit r14-2654-g01f6e8b013237041adeac370f8d229aea6304591
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101832
--- Comment #14 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
since it's opened again GCC12, the patch need to be backported to GCC12. then
will be closed at that time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 110535, which changed state.
Bug 110535 Summary: Internal error when performing a surrogate call with
unsatisfied constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110535
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110535
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110284
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80578
--- Comment #5 from Marc Mutz ---
Still in GCC 11 and GCC 13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110745
Bug ID: 110745
Summary: Improve printing of base classes
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110745
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110077
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I now think the right fix is:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/floating_from_chars.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/floating_from_chars.cc
@@ -1325,24 +1325,14 @@ _ZSt10from_charsPKcS0_RDF128_St12chars_format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110064
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1ae46bdd19fc2aaea41bc894168bdaf4799be80
commit r14-2657-gb1ae46bdd19fc2aaea41bc894168bdaf4799be80
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110064
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110737
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
7137 /* TARGET_EXPR temps aren't part of the enclosing block, so add
it
7138 to the temps list. Handle also variable length TARGET_EXPRs.
*/
7139 if (!poly_int_tree_p (DECL_SI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110737
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.1.0, 8.1.0
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110742
--- Comment #10 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Thank you very much for digging into this!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110737
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
You can also get ICE with _Atomic int with a similar testcase:
```
_Atomic int c;
void f(void);
int g(void)
{
return (c += f());
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110700
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b86c0fe327a5196a316bd698d12765b08de5dce7
commit r14-2658-gb86c0fe327a5196a316bd698d12765b08de5dce7
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110700
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Should be fixed on trunk by the above patch. Keeping open to track backporting
to branches for gcc 12 and gcc 13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110745
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e92ca8d3b4cab96a9f79466b5158381cb3103f9d
commit r14-2659-ge92ca8d3b4cab96a9f79466b5158381cb3103f9d
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110745
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110737
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
build_atomic_assign does not handle this in a reasonable fashion.
Note there is code like :
if (modifycode != NOP_EXPR)
add_stmt (rhs);
/* NOP_EXPR indicates it's a straight store of the RHS. Simply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110593
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d614822e9ea2a3d8800045d66e3220743753d09
commit r14-2660-g2d614822e9ea2a3d8800045d66e3220743753d09
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109921
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0867d30a68de68f4c809757348447bef94ef1491
commit r14-2661-g0867d30a68de68f4c809757348447bef94ef1491
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110077
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0867d30a68de68f4c809757348447bef94ef1491
commit r14-2661-g0867d30a68de68f4c809757348447bef94ef1491
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110077
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I hope this is fixed now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
I am really sorry for causing the inconvience.
Working on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109921
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd2f934bb09c04e62beb8eb5421467184598983b
commit r13-7593-gcd2f934bb09c04e62beb8eb5421467184598983b
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109921
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.3|13.2
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110593
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
Bug ID: 110746
Summary: gcc-12 fails: sorry, unimplemented: PCH allocation
failure
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
--- Comment #1 from Yuri ---
OS: FreeBSD 13.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
It means pch is not fully supported due to pie. This has been improved/fixed in
gcc 13 though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Or it is while creating pch.
Please mention what you were doing when the message came up.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
Thiago Jung Bauermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago.bauermann at linaro dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
--- Comment #4 from Yuri ---
This happens during the build of the Ossia Score project:
https://github.com/ossia/score
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-20
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108179
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
This patch caused PR110566.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
--- Comment #9 from Lewis Hyatt ---
Thanks, sorry about that, I need to replace "unsigned long" with "size_t". Will
fix it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
--- Comment #10 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
(In reply to Lewis Hyatt from comment #9)
> Thanks, sorry about that, I need to replace "unsigned long" with "size_t".
> Will fix it.
No problem. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
--- Comment #2 from Li Pan ---
Hi there,
Just try to reproduce this bug with powerPC cross compiler (sorry we don't have
a real powerPC) with the below options. Unfortunately, I failed to reproduce
this bug as above mentioned.
Could you please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
--- Comment #6 from Yuri ---
FAILED:
src/plugins/score-plugin-avnd/CMakeFiles/score_plugin_avnd.dir/__/__/__/midiscaler_avnd.cpp.o
/usr/local/libexec/ccache/g++13 -DBOOST_ASIO_DISABLE_CONCEPTS=1
-DBOOST_MATH_DISABLE_FLOAT128=1 -DBOOST_NO_RTTI=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
--- Comment #7 from Yuri ---
gcc-13 has the same problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |pch
Summary|gcc-12 and gcc-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||freebsd
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2cfe5233e682fc04a9b6fc91f3d30685515630b
commit r14-2665-gb2cfe5233e682fc04a9b6fc91f3d30685515630b
Author: Lewis Hyatt
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong ---
Kewen from IBM will soon send a patch to fix it.
Sorry for causing this issue.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
--- Comment #5 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Li Pan from comment #2)
> Hi there,
>
> Just try to reproduce this bug with powerPC cross compiler (sorry we don't
> have a real powerPC) with the below options. Unfortunately, I failed to
> reprod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
--- Comment #6 from Kewen Lin ---
The root cause is that the length and bias handling about LEN_STORE in sccvn
was missed to be updated, the below diff can fix the failure.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc
index 11061a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110744
--- Comment #7 from Li Pan ---
Thanks a lot for the explanation, Kewen.
Looks you are taking care of this already, anything is required from my-side
please feel free to let me know.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110747
Bug ID: 110747
Summary: GCC rejects the syntax for an immediately invoked
lambda as a template argument in a requires-clause
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110740
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
Bug ID: 110748
Summary: optimize store of DF 0.0
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
--- Comment #2 from Kito Cheng ---
And seems we already has such constraint for a while, not sure why GCC 13 did
that, I saw the status has changed to ASSIGNED, so I assume Vineet you are
already spending time on that, so I will just stop there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110749
Bug ID: 110749
Summary: wrong show float
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
--- Comment #3 from Vineet Gupta ---
Indeed the constraint already exists
(define_insn "*movdf_hardfloat_rv64"
[(set (match_operand:DF 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=f,f,f,m,m,*f,*r,
*r,*r,*m")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110728
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110731
Bug ID: 110731
Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong-code because of
wide-int division since r5-424
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110731
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110732
Bug ID: 110732
Summary: Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu (recent
regression)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110731
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This should have done the negative (in the original patch):
1796 /* The quotient is neg if exactly one of the divisor or dividend is
1797 neg. */
1798 if (dividend_neg != divisor_neg)
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-2629-20230718223755-g1d3e4f4e2d1-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20230719 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110732
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110252
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 110732 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Bug ID: 110734
Summary: Attributes cannot be applied to asm statements
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Julian Waters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |13.1.1
--- Comment #1 from Julian Water
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110735
Bug ID: 110735
Summary: [OpenMP] Rejected: Non-rectangular loop nests with
non-constant iteration step size
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110736
Bug ID: 110736
Summary: gcc: internal compiler error: in change_stack, at
reg-stack.cc:2709
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110731
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think the problem is earlier.
If I divide the same values unsigned, while the representation of the wide_int
values
is the same, i.e.
val = {0, -18014398509481984}, len = 2, precision = 119
for x, when div
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
--- Comment #2 from Julian Waters ---
Is this accurately described as an enhancement? This is erroneous behaviour
with something that is already meant to be a feature in gcc (applying
attributes to statements, as seen inside parser.cc), not a fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110736
--- Comment #1 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
It looks like this is similar to bug 110667, but ICEs under different
optimization option (-Ofast with -Os).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110624
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4adf49a436429010ba928d4dc262625298e0d21a
commit r13-7587-g4adf49a436429010ba928d4dc262625298e0d21a
Author: Iain Sandoe
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107424
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85da0b40538fb0d17d89de1e7905984668e3dfef
commit r14-2634-g85da0b40538fb0d17d89de1e7905984668e3dfef
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110737
Bug ID: 110737
Summary: GCC: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when
processing __builtin_isinf and _Atomic long double
together
Product: gcc
Version: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110724
--- Comment #7 from Javier Martinez
---
Another case where it might be interesting to remove padding (or reduce the :m
threshold) is when the path is known to be cold. I can see Trunk padding labels
inside [clone .cold], and with attribute((col
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107424
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110711
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
Looks like it's GCC13 regression, GCC12.3 successfully vectorizes k_std_max
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110711
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #5)
> Looks like it's GCC13 regression, GCC12.3 successfully vectorizes k_std_max
https://godbolt.org/z/6111MP354
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110711
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu ---
git diff gcc12_171t.ifcvt gcc13.173.ifcvt
[local count: 955630227]:
- # i_22 = PHI
+ # i_21 = PHI
# prephitmp_19 = PHI
- _2 = i_22 * 8;
+ _2 = i_21 * 8;
_3 = a_10(D) + _2;
_17 = MEM[(const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110284
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
My bootstrap today on i686-linux failed again
In file included from ../../gcc/m2/gm2-gcc/gcc-consolidation.h:71,
from ../../gcc/m2/gm2-gcc/rtegraph.cc:22:
../../gcc/internal-fn.h:24:10: fat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110717
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110625
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
The current issue rate framework was originally written for Neoverse V1 and
Neoverse V2. For those cores, it wasn't necessary to make a distinction
between scalar integer operations and scala
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110717
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Thanks.
Shouldn't
INTVAL (operands[2]) < * BITS_PER_UNIT
be
UINTVAL (operands[2]) < * BITS_PER_UNIT
just to make sure it doesn't trigger for negative?
ble-multilib --disable-bootstrap
--enable-languages=c,c++
--prefix=/zdata/shaoli/compilers/ccbuilder-compilers/gcc-ec842611618c9f8a50f3326d42c51961de8b28a5
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20230719 (experimental) (GCC)
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110738
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>Clang can remove all the code.
Clang does not implement the noipa attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110738
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110606
marcus at mc dot pp.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marcus at mc dot pp.se
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110738
--- Comment #3 from Shaohua Li ---
Would this test case be interesting? If no, I won't report other similar
issues.
https://godbolt.org/z/9xr1rv37s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110717
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
CC|uros at gcc dot g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110625
--- Comment #8 from Hao Liu ---
Thanks for the explanation. Understood the root cause and that's reasonable.
So, do you have plan to fix this (i.e. to separate the FP and integer types)?
I want to enable the new costs for Ampere1, which is sim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110737
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110736
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-19
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110734
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110733
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Keywords|
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
