https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110649
--- Comment #2 from Hao Liu ---
Hi, I bisected the following 3 commits (sequantial):
[v3] 3a61ca1b925 - Improve profile updates after loop-ch and cunroll
(2023-07-06)
[v2] d4c2e34deef - Improve scale_loop_profile (2023-07-06)
[v1] 224fd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #8)
> or maybe "using::strtold" additions are needed to various cstdlib files in
> gcc.
Yes, that's the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110652
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110652
>
> Kewen Lin changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110660
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110660
>
> --- Comment #2 from JuzheZhong ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110625
--- Comment #3 from Hao Liu ---
Sorry, it seems this case can not be fixed by only adjusting the calculation of
"reduction latency". Even it becomes smaller, the case still can not be
vectorized as the "general operations" count is still too la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And this should fix it:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/c_global/cstdlib
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/c_global/cstdlib
@@ -256,6 +256,20 @@ namespace std
using ::__gnu_cxx::strtold;
} // namespace std
+#el
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110663
Bug ID: 110663
Summary: [OpenMP] Use 'affinity' clause for node placement for
the 'task' construct
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: mis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99666
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110663
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Carry on of Jakub's comment in PR99666 about implementing this:
"Yeah, but not really sure if we want to do anything with it other than accept
it / verify the restrictions.
"The tasking is already overly co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104914
--- Comment #14 from YunQiang Su ---
New patch:
diff --git a/gcc/expmed.cc b/gcc/expmed.cc
index fbd4ce2d42f..66d45da67df 100644
--- a/gcc/expmed.cc
+++ b/gcc/expmed.cc
@@ -850,6 +850,7 @@ store_bit_field_1 (rtx str_rtx, poly_uint64 bitsize,
po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109154
--- Comment #66 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d8f5e349772b6652bddb0620bb178290905998b9
commit r14-2516-gd8f5e349772b6652bddb0620bb178290905998b9
Author: Tamar Christina
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109154
--- Comment #67 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ed4fcfe47f28b36c73d74109898514ef4da00fb
commit r14-2517-g9ed4fcfe47f28b36c73d74109898514ef4da00fb
Author: Tamar Christina
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109156
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110664
Bug ID: 110664
Summary: -std=c2x -pedantic-errors pedwarns on _Float128
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55538|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110550
--- Comment #2 from Sascha Wilde ---
(please excuse my late reply)
Indeed without jit the build works as expected.
However, jit is the primary reason I'm building gcc on NetBSD.
Building relocateable code also in the supporting libraries is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9206641d0899e4bae3ad6765129661ff3bcc423a
commit r14-2521-g9206641d0899e4bae3ad6765129661ff3bcc423a
Author: Mikael Morin
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e93452a5712e87ba624562ba7164b1e1394d18fb
commit r14-2519-ge93452a5712e87ba624562ba7164b1e1394d18fb
Author: Mikael Morin
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71e4d568b1264bca46d30c5fc4933f137d05ca24
commit r14-2520-g71e4d568b1264bca46d30c5fc4933f137d05ca24
Author: Mikael Morin
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110657
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jose E. Marchesi :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53d12ecd624ec901d8449cfa1917f6f90e910927
commit r14-2522-g53d12ecd624ec901d8449cfa1917f6f90e910927
Author: Jose E. Marchesi
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110657
--- Comment #6 from Jose E. Marchesi ---
Hello Kris.
The commit above (now in gcc master) should fix the issue. Can you please
confirm?
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87944
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109112
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #7)
> Why don't the existing optimizations work on the artificial function the
> same as any other function? i.e. like
>
> struct S { bool x; };
> void do_something(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110665
Bug ID: 110665
Summary: RISC-V do not preserve vector registers in interrupt
handler
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110665
--- Comment #1 from Lehua Ding ---
If it's a problem, I'm willing to fix it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110665
--- Comment #2 from Lehua Ding ---
I just found the relevant specification and the specification seems to require
that the vector registers used be saved.
> The interrupt attribute specifies that a function is an interrupt handler.
> The compil
-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20230714 (experimental) (GCC)
[502] %
[502] % gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out
[503] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
Aborted
[504] % cat small.c
int a;
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110667
Bug ID: 110667
Summary: gcc-14, ICE: internal compiler error: in replace_reg,
at reg-stack.cc:722
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
Alexander Klepikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55503|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110649
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110649
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
We also have PR98782 that is about sphinx being sensitive to LRA decisions.
Reducing loopback probability might trigger LRA adding a spill to the loop.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110659
--- Comment #9 from Rich Townsend ---
OK, I managed to get things working by setting
export LDFLAGS='-Wl,--no-eh-frame-hdr'
prior to configuring. I'm hoping this won't affect the functionality of the
built compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110666
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110206
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1815e313a8fb519a77c94a908eb6dafc4ce51ffe
commit r14-2525-g1815e313a8fb519a77c94a908eb6dafc4ce51ffe
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110667
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110666
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I totally messed up the !=1/!=0 cases for the outer eq case:
Patch
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index 351d9285e92..3de30df8b06 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -6431,8 +6431,8 @@ D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102854
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
The testcase of comment 2 seems to be the same as the one of
bug 106449 comment 4, which went in as
r13-1887-g97d32048c04e97 openmp: Fix up handling of non-rectangular simd loops
with pointer type iterator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110668
Bug ID: 110668
Summary: gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in:1012:
ada/b_gnat1.adb] Error 5
Product: gcc
Version: 10.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110666
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55544
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55544&action=edit
Full testcase to make sure we don't create wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110668
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88873
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8911879415d6c2a7baad88235554a912887a1c5c
commit r14-2526-g8911879415d6c2a7baad88235554a912887a1c5c
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109876
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5138df96a93d3b5070c88b8617eabd38cb24ab6
commit r14-2527-gb5138df96a93d3b5070c88b8617eabd38cb24ab6
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110668
--- Comment #2 from Dennis Clarke ---
Oh darn. Is this documented anywhere in the build instructions?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109876
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55542|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110588
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43a0a5cd57eefd5a5bbead606ec4f6959af31802
commit r14-2528-g43a0a5cd57eefd5a5bbead606ec4f6959af31802
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110670
Bug ID: 110670
Summary: tree-vect-stmts.cc:9733:11: warning: variable 'offvar'
is sometimes initialised
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110669
Bug ID: 110669
Summary: [24 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/torture/pr105132.c since
r14-2515-gb77161e60bce7b
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110669
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110668
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html, GNAT section, 4th paragraph.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110647
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
This is a testcase based on our testuiste version so it can be copied to
compiler explorer
#define iterations 1
#define LEN_1D 32000
#define LEN_2D 256
#define ARRAY_ALIGNMENT 64
typedef float real_t;
#d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110669
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C code seems to be:
int g_29, func_47_p_48, func_47_p_51_l_129;
void func_47_p_51() {
for (;;) {
func_47_p_51_l_129 = 0;
for (; func_47_p_51_l_129 <= 1; func_47_p_51_l_129 += 1) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110668
Dennis Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:447dd2924e43884d798d8c40765cbfddd0fde0ae
commit r13-7564-g447dd2924e43884d798d8c40765cbfddd0fde0ae
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110654
--- Comment #2 from Ulrich Drepper ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> So this is due to differences in the languages themselves rather than due to
> C vs C++ front-end ...
This is certainly true for the validation.
But the stand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:995c717500c368c5aec7889dfa047cff7cb0139b
commit r12-9773-g995c717500c368c5aec7889dfa047cff7cb0139b
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a348245bfb018f02b36d22575380b34aef58f52c
commit r11-10910-ga348245bfb018f02b36d22575380b34aef58f52c
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110657
--- Comment #7 from Kris Van Hees ---
Confirmed that it resolves the issue
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110657
Jose E. Marchesi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99139
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.5.0, 11.4.0, 12.3.0,
/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20230714 (experimental) (GCC)
[632] %
[632] % gcctk -O2 -c small.c
during GIMPLE pass: sccp
small.c: In function ‘main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108556
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=553
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnu.iodaj at simplelogin dot
com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59172
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110206
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bef95ba085b0ae9bf3eb79a8eed685236d773116
commit r13-7565-gbef95ba085b0ae9bf3eb79a8eed685236d773116
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110662
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
Summary|Segmentation fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110662
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110666
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87944
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110344
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d344146727da02eb5c62fbf6cee97a4e96d63db
commit r14-2535-g8d344146727da02eb5c62fbf6cee97a4e96d63db
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110206
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eeb8e9a36d7aa9bc4ac8b0d7abe1e84e9afc4250
commit r12-9774-geeb8e9a36d7aa9bc4ac8b0d7abe1e84e9afc4250
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110206
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110672
Bug ID: 110672
Summary: vec.h:1023:9: error: 'new_temp' may be used
uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110652
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110672
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110252
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
Updated patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/624563.html
(depends on:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/624562.html
)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The preprocessed source that is produced by GCC 13 is warning free.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
PRE leaves around:
[local count: 118111600]:
...
pretmp_163 = 0;
[local count: 19488414]:
if (pretmp_163 != 0)
goto ; [59.00%]
else
goto ; [41.00%]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110673
Bug ID: 110673
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when buliding opus (internal
compiler error: in gimple_phi_arg_def_from_edge, at
gimple.h:4699)
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110673
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 55547
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55547&action=edit
test_unit_entropy.c.i
This is what cvise popped out, it's borderline invalid though, so let me touch
it up.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110666
--- Comment #5 from Zhendong Su ---
A couple of very likely related tests (especially #2 and #3):
*** (1) wrong code at -O2, -O3, and -Os
[539] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
[540] % gcctk -O2 small.c
[541] % timeout -s 9 5 ./a.out
Killed
[542]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110666
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Zhendong Su from comment #5)
> A couple of very likely related tests (especially #2 and #3):
>
> *** (1) wrong code at -O2, -O3, and -Os
case 1 is a phiopt issue (PR 110252).
> *** (2) wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110673
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 55548
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55548&action=edit
reduced.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110043
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
More simplified testcase:
```
__int128 g_116_1;
extern char g_521[][8];
void func_24() {
if (g_116_1 >= 0)
g_521[g_116_1][g_116_1] &= 0;
}
```
I think this ICEs with types which >= sizeof(offset_int)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109971
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
Has this been fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Has this been fixed with the commit?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110235
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99139
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #7)
> Updating known-to-work/known to fail version.
>
> Paul/Steve: do you want to assign this PR to one of you?
I am of two minds as to whether or not to backport the patch o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110372
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
94 matches
Mail list logo
