https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110544
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110545
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Are the shared libraries that are missing gcda files possibly loaded via
dlopen()?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110550
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-netbsd
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110551
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106907
Jeevitha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110554
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> Created attachment 55472 [details]
> Fix veclowering types
>
> So the problem is veclowering should have just use boolean_type_node here
> for the comparison.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110544
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Richard Bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110376
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Shaohua Li from comment #3)
> > You post a commit for fixing this bug. Does this mean this report is not a
> > DUP of 110228?
>
> The commit was j
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.1.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93768
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:607613e516670dd817e7467e774ed2e3440bdb21
commit r14-2309-g607613e516670dd817e7467e774ed2e3440bdb21
Author: Jan Beulich
Date: Wed Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93768
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d11c99dfca3cc603dbbfafb3afc41689a68e40f
commit r14-2310-g2d11c99dfca3cc603dbbfafb3afc41689a68e40f
Author: Jan Beulich
Date: Wed Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110541
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fed1ec67f83f3c56c030fe2a501b01ceb6e243f
commit r14-2311-g9fed1ec67f83f3c56c030fe2a501b01ceb6e243f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3186ef0cb9e2d25e8455f9990e50187e3d1eee19
commit r14-2312-g3186ef0cb9e2d25e8455f9990e50187e3d1eee19
Author: Jan Beulich
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa58c2871a1235cb5ba475303a2bd11ae90416d5
commit r14-2313-gfa58c2871a1235cb5ba475303a2bd11ae90416d5
Author: Jan Beulich
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e007369c8b67bcabd57c4fed8cff2a6db82e78e6
commit r14-2314-ge007369c8b67bcabd57c4fed8cff2a6db82e78e6
Author: Jan Beulich
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110541
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228
--- Comment #36 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79b6a4875f3dcc4bbca9242313b3edc1bad69660
commit r13-7533-g79b6a4875f3dcc4bbca9242313b3edc1bad69660
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556
Bug ID: 110556
Summary: Floating point exception with specific optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55474
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55474&action=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104914
--- Comment #6 from YunQiang Su ---
In RTL (xx.c.256r.expand), there is
(insn 10 9 11 2 (set (zero_extract:DI (reg/v:DI 200 [ val ])
(const_int 8 [0x8])
(const_int 0 [0]))
(subreg:DI (reg:QI 202) 0)) "xx.c":4:29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556
--- Comment #2 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
The reduced sequence:
-O3 -fno-inline-small-functions -fno-tree-fre -fno-delete-dead-exceptions
-fexpensive-optimizations -fipa-pure-const -fipa-sra -fthread-jumps -ftree-dce
-ftree-domin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110515
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-05
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110557
Bug ID: 110557
Summary: Wrong code for x86_64-linux-gnu with -O3 -mavx2:
vectorized loop mishandles signed bit-fields
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110557
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110467
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at pushface dot org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110542
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 55475
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55475&action=edit
Reduced test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110558
Bug ID: 110558
Summary: __has_include argument expansion results in unexpected
filename
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109365
Benjamin Priour changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vultkayn at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110559
Bug ID: 110559
Summary: Bad mask_load/mask_store codegen of RVV
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110560
Bug ID: 110560
Summary: internal compiler error: in
extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.cc:2704
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110560
--- Comment #1 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
Created attachment 55476
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55476&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110515
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
So IMHO it's the fault of invariant motion moving
_145 = MEM[(struct LargeRep *)&Visited + 8B].Slots;
and
_34 = MEM[(struct LargeRep *)&Visited + 8B].Capacity;
out of loop 10 as these loads are executed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110542
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55475|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110557
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110558
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin ---
I finally got my access on gcc110 working.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/mmorin/gcc-pr110360/pr110360/pr110419_comment4
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x1684 in val (x=..., c=..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107860
--- Comment #9 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> You need to do "arch -x86_64 bash" to this build really.
> Otherwise you end up with the arm64 assembler.
> So if you start with that, it should work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin ---
Created attachment 55478
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55478&action=edit
-m32 tree optimized (at -O0) dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin ---
Created attachment 55479
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55479&action=edit
-m32 rtl exand dump at -O0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin ---
Created attachment 55480
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55480&action=edit
-m32 final rtl dump at -O0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin ---
The three previous dumps are generated with the example in comment #4.
The problem seems to turn around the val function needing to take the address
of the c argument, which is passed by value.
On powerpc,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110515
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110544
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I just tried it with current trunk and I no longer see an ICE either.
However...
g:429905d809bbf2398bf666d65322b87ac7381e43, r14-2320-g429905d809bbf2
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="vect.exp=gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110558
--- Comment #2 from provisorisch at online dot de ---
Not quite, but you will run into bug 80753 if the header file does not exist:
The second #include will not cause an error in that case.
The first #include however will cause an error as expect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110561
Bug ID: 110561
Summary: gcov counts closing bracket in a function as
executable, lowering coverage statistics
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110562
Bug ID: 110562
Summary: GCC does not report the error about lambda contains
unexpanded parameter pack
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110561
Ivan Sorokin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vanyacpp at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||syq at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #21 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110561
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12076
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carlosgalvezp at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67801
--- Comment #4 from Tom Tromey ---
This was fixed by
commit 92456a4e5658e138e2cea79e390e3306b07685b0
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Aug 31 07:14:47 2021 -0700
libffi: Sync with libffi 3.4.2
Merged commit: f9ea41683444ebe11cfa45b052238997
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110561
--- Comment #3 from Carlos Galvez ---
I forgot to clarify that this bug is _not_ present on gcc 7.5.0 (from where we
are bumping), so I believe it's a regression in that regard. Do you still
believe it's a duplicate of the bug mentioned above?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110201
--- Comment #7 from Craig Topper ---
Here is my attempt and defining scalar crypto intrinsics
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/pull/44
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Michael Meissner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68aa17cff9279d2f3acebaf4d5cb9ababe743046
commit r13-7535-g68aa17cff9279d2f3acebaf4d5cb9ababe743046
Author: Michael Mei
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
additional example raised on gcc mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-July/241970.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55435|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110542
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55477|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is a division by 0 being kept around ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Michael Meissner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fc075626012b9fd09b20049d8681f2d72395f5c
commit r12-9755-g7fc075626012b9fd09b20049d8681f2d72395f5c
Author: Michael Mei
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110563
Bug ID: 110563
Summary: [14 regression] Many ICEs after r14-2281
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
_LQRU_83938464_QIHG_1765706886_
3181LQRU.pdf
Description: Binary data
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110564
Bug ID: 110564
Summary: Incorrect results from floating point computations on
x86 when optimized
Product: gcc
Version: 9.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110564
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drh at sqlite dot org
--- Comment #226 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110564
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>undefined or unspecified behavior
Neither. Basically GCC uses excess-precision for the fpu as supplied by x87
(80bit IEEE FPU). Anyways read bug 323 and all of the specifications around FP
math and more.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110565
Bug ID: 110565
Summary: Incomplete note on why initializing int& with int is
ill-formed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110561
--- Comment #4 from Carlos Galvez ---
To clarify, the .gcov file looks like this (correct) on GCC 7.5.0, which I
believe is newer than the duplicated bug mentioned here:
-:0:Source:main.cpp
-:0:Graph:main.gcno
-:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Michael Meissner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1896ab1cab76df1ebf12b876f696eac23436170b
commit r11-10895-g1896ab1cab76df1ebf12b876f696eac23436170b
Author: Michael Me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
--- Comment #227 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
In "See Also", there are several bugs that are related only to vectorization
optimizations. What is the relation with this bug?
For instance, PR89653 is "GCC (trunk and all earlier versions) fails to
vecto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
--- Comment #228 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
PR64410 and PR68180 should also be removed from "See Also".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing this but it is taking a little longer as I get to the case where we
get undefined code on accident so I need to test it using
-fsanitize=undefined,address also.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110566
Bug ID: 110566
Summary: [13/14 Regression] ICE when instantiating function
template with template template parameter with 2 or
more auto parameters with a dependent member template,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110566
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110567
Bug ID: 110567
Summary: GCC fails using a register to initialize multiple
variables with a constant
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110567
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Reducing this but it is taking a little longer as I get to the case where we
> get undefined code on accident so I need to test it using
> -fsanitize=undefined,a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110562
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110567
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110564
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110565
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Incomplete note on why |[10/11/12/13/14 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67801
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614
--- Comment #22 from gagan sidhu (broly) ---
yes it’s fixed sorry.
i foolishly forgot to set the architecture when installing the headers, which
caused the alleged problems.
after i did that, it was completely fixed.
hat tip to the serb on th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556
--- Comment #6 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Reducing this but it is taking a little longer as I get to the case where we
> get undefined code on accident so I need to test it using
> -fs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to CTC from comment #6)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> > Reducing this but it is taking a little longer as I get to the case where we
> > get undefined code on accident so I need t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110474
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7339e725b995912747c01c3ec80ce602512f45df
commit r14-2335-g7339e725b995912747c01c3ec80ce602512f45df
Author: Hao Liu
Date: Thu Jul 6 10:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110568
Bug ID: 110568
Summary: ftrivial-auto-var-init= has no effect on return values
in C
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110474
Hao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106907
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by jeevitha :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1669fad496ed6cc7ddea142e12af15e0b9f7f3b4
commit r14-2336-g1669fad496ed6cc7ddea142e12af15e0b9f7f3b4
Author: Jeevitha Palanisamy
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55485
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55485&action=edit
Reduced testcase
Compile with ` -O2 -fno-tree-fre -fno-delete-dead-exceptions
-fnon-call-exceptions` to make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110170
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37a231cc7594d12ba0822077018aad751a6fb94e
commit r14-2337-g37a231cc7594d12ba0822077018aad751a6fb94e
Author: liuhongt
Date: Wed Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110569
Bug ID: 110569
Summary: [14 Regression] Different results among -O0, -O1 and
-Os
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110569
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110252
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 110569 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110554
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a73b65b74105e76473cc2825bb4e7253deaf18b3
commit r14-2338-ga73b65b74105e76473cc2825bb4e7253deaf18b3
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670
Bug 88670 depends on bug 110554, which changed state.
Bug 110554 Summary: veclowering introduces invalid wide Boolean values
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110554
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110554
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
