https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110517
Bug ID: 110517
Summary: ICE in in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at
sel-sched.cc:4549
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110517
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55449
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55449&action=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110497
--- Comment #2 from Daniel ---
Just some observations:
There was a similar discussion in
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/75443227/static-assert-on-an-ill-formed-no-diagnostic-required-expression
Note that if we use anything else which le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110518
Bug ID: 110518
Summary: ICE in alloc_succs_info, at sel-sched-ir.cc:4723
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110518
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55451
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55451&action=edit
The preprocessed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110004
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
It seems that fixing (part of) the jump threading profile mismatches has
improved stats a lot. Still there are some more visible regressions that can be
understood. I looked into range for first and did not s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736
Boris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bp at alien8 dot de
--- Comment #20 from Boris
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110519
Bug ID: 110519
Summary: Optimize loop that only assigns to a local variable
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110512
--- Comment #3 from gnzlbg ---
@Jonathan What is missing in https://wg21.link/p2408 to enable the PSTL to use
the iterator concept for the iota_view::iterator such that the PSTL may run the
above in parallel?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110512
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110517
--- Comment #2 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
The reduced reproducer:
a, b, c, d;
e() {
for (;; a++) {
short *f = &c;
if (b && ++*f)
d = e;
}
}
main() {}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110510
--- Comment #4 from Franck Behaghel
---
Andrew,thanks.
Impressive !
Tested. Indeed, this patch fixes the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110520
Bug ID: 110520
Summary: -Wanalyzer-null-dereference false nagetive with `*ptr
= 10086`
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110521
Bug ID: 110521
Summary: -Wanalyzer-null-dereference false nagetive with `*p =
i`
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110519
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is already done when compiling with c++ frontend ...
For C, it can only done for for loops. Which makes it hard to do with the way
gcc handles loops at this point.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108743
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-02
Component|objc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108962
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e06e39a12e5a79bdb72d3c146cc71292f875aed
commit r14-2237-g2e06e39a12e5a79bdb72d3c146cc71292f875aed
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Sun J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108962
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f614e6bace45552f2196c7d27bf5981c2f6dd8db
commit r13-7522-gf614e6bace45552f2196c7d27bf5981c2f6dd8db
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108962
ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108743
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cdd4b3c0f0f428678c24de74b1f626628450799c
commit r14-2239-gcdd4b3c0f0f428678c24de74b1f626628450799c
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110522
Bug ID: 110522
Summary: `-fdiagnostics-format=sarif-file`: file name conflicts
/ races
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110523
Bug ID: 110523
Summary: [14 Regression] ICE in redeclare_class_template, at
cp/pt.cc:6391 on json-3.11.2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110523
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 55452
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55452&action=edit
bug.cpp.orig.xz
In case I reduced the file incorrectly attaching bug.cpp.orig.xz which should
build with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110508
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83733be3f7583f75f626c57e49679cfb9d877c5f
commit r14-2242-g83733be3f7583f75f626c57e49679cfb9d877c5f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110508
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110519
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |c
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110519
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
See bug 94392 comment #3 on why the general case does not apply to C and why we
decided not enable it when using the C front-end.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110519
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Optimize loop that only |Optimize for loop that only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110517
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110523
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110523
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Re-reducing it so it is warning free as the original was warning free.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178
--- Comment #15 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 55453
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55453&action=edit
Revised patch
Revised patch that takes Tobias' suggestion into account that we scan
the formal argu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110523
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The testers show a similar behavior on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11:
OK at -m64, FAIL at -m32. Not sure which endianness that is.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178
--- Comment #16 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-July/059545.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110125
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55357|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110485
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110524
Bug ID: 110524
Summary: Internal compiler error: ../csu/libc-start.c:392
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110524
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
On trunk:
/home/dyarosh/space/eve/include/eve/detail/function/simd/common/canonical_shuffle_adapter.hpp:
In instantiation of ‘decltype (invocable(p, g,
(get)(eve::detail::sfinae_friendly_apply_impl::t)...))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110524
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110057
--- Comment #9 from Ng YongXiang ---
Would anyone be willing to provide some feedback regarding the attachment
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55256&action=diff) that I have
created? Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110525
Bug ID: 110525
Summary: ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at
sel-sched.cc:4549
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110525
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55457
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55457&action=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85410
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 110525 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110525
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110526
Bug ID: 110526
Summary: ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110526
CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|13.2.1 |13.1.1
Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110526
--- Comment #2 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55458
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55458&action=edit
The preprocessed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110526
--- Comment #3 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55459
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55459&action=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110526
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Thanks for these bug reports, they are very useful. I will note
-fselective-scheduling is one of the less tested parts of GCC as it is not
default for any target except for ia64 (and ia64 is one of the least
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106895
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Constraints are completely the wrong tool for this. Just use modes, which
*are* the right tool?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110527
Bug ID: 110527
Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ASan is missing array
out-of-bounds check
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110527
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110528
Bug ID: 110528
Summary: Timeout with with specific optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110528
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55461
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55461&action=edit
C Source Code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110528
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you attach the preprocessed source?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110501
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110506
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
60 matches
Mail list logo