[Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 --- Comment #19 from Adelson Oliveira --- Thank you all Em qui., 18 de mai. de 2023 às 14:01, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> escreveu: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109641 > > anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org c

[Bug middle-end/107190] [aarch64] regression with optimization -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107190 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 55113 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55113&action=edit testcase

[Bug jit/107230] libgccjit rejects -march=native

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107230 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/66594] jitted code should use -mtune=native

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66594 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||helohe at bluewin dot ch --- Comment #9

[Bug target/106471] -march=generic might want to remove X86_TUNE_AVOID_FALSE_DEP_FOR_BMI now

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106471 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug target/106471] -march=generic might want to remove X86_TUNE_AVOID_FALSE_DEP_FOR_BMI now

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106471 --- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu --- The tune is added in PR62011

[Bug c++/107450] GCC accepts invalid program involving multiple template parameter packs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107450 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Reduced/simplified (using auto because I feel like it): int i, j, k; void f(auto){i++;} void g(auto){j++;} void h(auto){k++;} void foo(auto&&...args1, auto&&... args2, auto&&... args3) { (f(args1), ...);

[Bug tree-optimization/107462] Missed optimization of std::atomic::fetch_xxx "null operations" to std::atomic::load()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107462 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/107476] Spurious stringop-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107476 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Known to fail|

[Bug c++/106810] Unexpected constraint recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106810 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/108393] circular concept false-positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108393 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hewillk at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug target/107533] Inefficient code sequence for fp16 testcase on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107533 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-05-19 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/107587] Explicit specializations of user-defined deduction guides in unnamed namespaces trigger -Wunused-function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107587 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/106604] Fully-specified deduction guide in anonymous namespace warns as-if a function? Unsuppressably?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106604 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||development at jordi dot vilar.cat ---

[Bug tree-optimization/107694] Bogus stringop-overflow warning in gcc 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107694 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/107744] Error in constant evaluation of dynamic_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107744 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/105702] Add fix-it for missing nested-name-specifier on out-of-class assignment operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105702 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/105703] Add fix-it for missing nested-name-specifier on non-member function using 'this'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105703 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-05-19 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/106545] peephole.md seems like it should not exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106545 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/106545] peephole.md seems like it should not exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106545 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Note I see XTheadMemPair code has been added to peephole.md which is good to have it away. But again the first peephole is also handled differently already via zero_extendsidi2_shifted which was added in r1

[Bug driver/33980] Precompiled header file not removed on error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33980 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|pch

[Bug c/109905] New: Missed misleading indentation with braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109905 Bug ID: 109905 Summary: Missed misleading indentation with braces Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/109900] _mm256_abs_epi8 is not expanded on gimple level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109900 --- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu --- Yes, let me do the folding. FYI, for those floating point abs intrinsics, they're already implemented as _mm512_abs_ps (__m512 __A) { return (__m512) _mm512_and_epi32 ((__m512i) __A,

[Bug libffi/83636] libffi/mips/n32: don't .set mips4 for mips r6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83636 YunQiang Su changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/33980] Precompiled header file not removed on error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33980 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 55114 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55114&action=edit Patch which I am testing

[Bug driver/45536] PCH uses "-o file" even when there are other arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45536 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Component|pch

[Bug tree-optimization/106381] DCE depends on used programming language (C vs C++)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106381 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug driver/54163] Ignore -l[lib] option on PCH generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54163 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

<    1   2