https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109793
Bug ID: 109793
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/vect/pr108950.c from
r11-10752-gd4cbcb9e45c6d4 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87851
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.0, 12.2.0, 13.1.0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90207
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.5|---
--- Comment #8 from anlau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109761
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c13906f258fb34b3e0c90ddc8d9191dd72f3da0e
commit r14-639-gc13906f258fb34b3e0c90ddc8d9191dd72f3da0e
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109752
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbb6cf926f1732559b3a8aaf2796d34e8651c066
commit r14-640-gbbb6cf926f1732559b3a8aaf2796d34e8651c066
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109752
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109761
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12/13/14 Regression] |[10/11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100961
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109751
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109790
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||c++-lambda,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109447
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0069ce6631880776a44fb8408c6428c0812285cf
commit r12-9526-g0069ce6631880776a44fb8408c6428c0812285cf
Author: Dan Horák
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109794
Bug ID: 109794
Summary: Compile time hog when building chromium on
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109794
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 55035
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55035&action=edit
evaluate_prg_hwy.ii.xz (13)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109794
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109794
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55034|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97700
--- Comment #5 from Lukas Böger ---
One part of this seems to be resolved with version 13. Below, only the lambda
use case fails to compile, whereas prior to version 13, both type aliases are
rejected:
```
void fun() {}
struct S
{
void (*f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109751
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108303
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109751
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 108303, which changed state.
Bug 108303 Summary: lookup failes with requires clause on non-template friend
function of a class template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108303
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109790
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109790
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109765
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Report is at https://marc.info/?l=gmp-bugs&m=168367093126416&w=2. I ended up
sending it a few times because I've had mail delivery problems before and I
didn't realise the list was moderated even for subscribers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109795
Bug ID: 109795
Summary: is_standard_layout incorrect for colliding member and
base class
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109795
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>The following compiles on GCC 13.1.0 when it should not:
You have the opposite way around. GCC is the one which rejects this code while
the other compilers accept it ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109794
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
At -O0, it seems like LRA is taking a long time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109794
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> At -O0, it seems like LRA is taking a long time.
But -O0 completes for me on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109794
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
-O0:
LRA non-specific : 33.12 ( 20%) 0.06 ( 1%) 33.15 ( 19%)
279M ( 25%)
LRA virtuals elimination : 2.08 ( 1%) 0.00 ( 0%) 2.08 ( 1%)
18M ( 2%)
LRA reload in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109794
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh I know this bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109794
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109793
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104069
Miklos Karacsony changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkaracsony81 at gmail dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
--- Comment #32 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 9 May 2023, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
>
> --- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Comment on attachment 55031
> --> https
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108985
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:531d5439021fb6402cf3f8606b9d9e13f9d03e5a
commit r11-10756-g531d5439021fb6402cf3f8606b9d9e13f9d03e5a
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109793
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 136 of 136 matches
Mail list logo