https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109724
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
I checked 11 and 12 and they are not affected. We run in circles through
valueize_refs_1 in vn_reference_maybe_forwprop_address, repeatedly picking up
_24 = &MEM [(const struct SkDPoint
&)iftmp.77_74].fP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53929
--- Comment #15 from LIU Hao ---
> Which as least MASM up to 12.x won't assemble. For one it complains about
> "rip" being undeclared. And then the load of "ecx" is _not_ a memory access
> (i.e. the "DWORD PTR" is ignored there). Which is in line
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109724
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
The real issue is probably that when value-numbering
Value numbering stmt = iftmp.77_74 = PHI
Setting value number of iftmp.77_74 to iftmp.77_177 (changed)
iftmp.77_177 is available for iftmp.77_177
we h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53932
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53929
--- Comment #16 from jbeulich at suse dot com ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #15)
> This is accepted by ML64:
>
> ```
> PUBLICmain
> EXTRN rip:DWORD
> _TEXT SEGMENT
> main PROC
> mov eax, DWORD PTR rip
> ret 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87204
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105554
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105685
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105774
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106144
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106190
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106261
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106719
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106751
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106981
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107001
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107065
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107183
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107317
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107358
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 10.5 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107465
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109727
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||56456
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107558
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 10.5 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108068
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108180
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108349
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80174
Bug 80174 depends on bug 108349, which changed state.
Bug 108349 Summary: LTO mismatch for __builtin_realloc between glibc and
gfortran frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108349
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108365
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 108365, which changed state.
Bug 108365 Summary: [10 Regression] Wrong code with -O0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108365
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108474
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53929
--- Comment #17 from LIU Hao ---
Yeah. It looks to me like the Microsoft compiler doesn't actually uses the
assembler (like LLVM).
Given the C source:
```
extern int rax;
int main() { return rax; }
```
which compiled without errors:
```
> cl /O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108596
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108685
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108854
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108881
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108973
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109096
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109151
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109728
Bug ID: 109728
Summary: lambda capture with initializer doesn't compile
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109164
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109724
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109676
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a715d3e136fc4dfdc42cb6a3ee1a7df3e2a171a
commit r14-468-g3a715d3e136fc4dfdc42cb6a3ee1a7df3e2a171a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109712
--- Comment #4 from Carlos Galvez ---
> Does libcudart_static.a by chance contain any symbols from the libgcc runtime
I'm not sure, do you know how I could check that (I'm pretty n00b on these
things :)). What I know is that libcudart.so does n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109724
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Reduced testcase. I've reduced with
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
index 666d7061aa8..31879fb761b 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
@@ -1558,6 +1558,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108969
--- Comment #32 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c9061e0418ded473672069aac43b25f6fd491b8
commit r13-7287-g9c9061e0418ded473672069aac43b25f6fd491b8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109694
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:addbe91570d7da35c48e6cf35b002a94a699fdd0
commit r13-7288-gaddbe91570d7da35c48e6cf35b002a94a699fdd0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109676
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05bc529829f25aacdaa567ef488b353bf2746c5b
commit r13-7292-g05bc529829f25aacdaa567ef488b353bf2746c5b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109724
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee99aaae4aeecd55f1d945a959652cf07e3b2e9e
commit r14-470-gee99aaae4aeecd55f1d945a959652cf07e3b2e9e
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109724
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de45793d0a102fc71785b90ce9ce75e57878da5d
commit r13-7293-gde45793d0a102fc71785b90ce9ce75e57878da5d
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109712
Carlos Galvez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109724
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9945e5f0e705588eada3ae26bb2168124c88461a
commit r12-9510-g9945e5f0e705588eada3ae26bb2168124c88461a
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109724
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d7e2d67bfd316125d7344bc713396ecab2ac3df
commit r11-10744-g7d7e2d67bfd316125d7344bc713396ecab2ac3df
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109724
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:946dc2eb7aeb1f3bf0085975a7325941acfb978f
commit r10-11392-g946dc2eb7aeb1f3bf0085975a7325941acfb978f
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109724
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108969
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109721
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Huh, we indeed vectorize count_averages (). But I have no idea how the
offending rev should have changed this ...
Ah. Before we had
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/predcom-2.c:27:55: missed: not vectorized: relevant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97122
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99195
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d840bc5cab39aa3dd8222d72b2cd40942bf91c93
commit r14-472-gd840bc5cab39aa3dd8222d72b2cd40942bf91c93
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99195
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93c26deab98fc80b616a1c53c324a88f61036f53
commit r14-473-g93c26deab98fc80b616a1c53c324a88f61036f53
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109729
Bug ID: 109729
Summary: gm2 (14.0.0) does not like a CHAR type FOR loop
control variable any more
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For peak memory consumption there is -fmem-report, which prints stats about GC
memory.
For this PR I think you want instead measure maximum stack usage.
Perhaps GCC could be built with -fstack-usage and som
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109729
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109730
Bug ID: 109730
Summary: ICE in c_common_parse_file()
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54627
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
Bug 56113 depends on bug 54627, which changed state.
Bug 54627 Summary: VRP uses lots of memory and compile-time
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54627
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 4 May 2023, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
>
> Aldy Hernandez changed:
>
>What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-07-12 00:00:00 |2023-5-4
Keywords|alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108900
--- Comment #2 from Libin Dang ---
The reason we rose this issue is that it broken our internal code coverage test
suite.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109730
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |[12/13/14 regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103240
--- Comment #7 from frankhb1989 at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> What are the mangled type names that are unordered? (that's all you need to
> describe, everything about flat_map and partition_point is irrelev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109731
Bug ID: 109731
Summary: g++ eveluates delete's expressio more than once
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109721
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82cfd93ae81a5687bf2a1b12d964c630e95517a7
commit r14-474-g82cfd93ae81a5687bf2a1b12d964c630e95517a7
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109721
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
--- Comment #41 from Richard Biener ---
Samples: 3M of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 4336899960635
Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Symbol
73.66% 2793479 cc1 cc1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103240
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #7)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
>
> > What are the mangled type names that are unordered? (that's all you need to
> > describe, everything about f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109731
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-05-04
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109731
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
ASan shows the use-after-free:
=
==46643==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x60200010
at pc 0x004010c4 bp 0x7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109717
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109731
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It seems that it's considered safe because Token::lexer_ is const, so GCC
thinks the value of token->lexer_ can't be changed by the ~Lexer() destructor.
That's true, but 'token' can become an invalid point
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109717
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |tree-optimization
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109717
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And requiring every library to annotate every assumption causes regressions
like PR 109703, where the cure is worse than the disease.
A wrong-code bug is worse than a false positive warning, but the warni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109720
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
We complain about the m_num_bits read. While PRE isolates it to BB3 even
before PRE that happens unconditionally:
[local count: 118111600]:
nbits ={v} {CLOBBER};
_25 = MEM[(const struct DynamicBitS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109731
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52339
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52339
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.1.0, 14.0, 4.1.0, 4.6.2
Last reco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109717
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109730
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109622
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Julian Brown :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a26a42b237bada32165e61867a2bf4461c5fab2
commit r14-481-g0a26a42b237bada32165e61867a2bf4461c5fab2
Author: Julian Brown
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109730
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-05-04
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109732
Bug ID: 109732
Summary: [14 regression] gcc miscompiles iterator comparison on
nlohmann_json
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109732
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |tree-optimization
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109732
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] gcc |[14 regression] gcc
|m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109732
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Both -O1 and -fno-strict-aliasing remove the bug:
$ g++-14 unit-t.cpp -O2 -Ijson/include -o a -O1 && ./a
SUCCESS!
$ g++-14 unit-t.cpp -O2 -Ijson/include -o a -fno-strict-aliasing && ./a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109732
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Looking at optimized dump before and after the revision I see an obvious error:
diff -u good bad
--- good2023-05-04 14:12:16.160695781 +0200
+++ bad 2023-05-04 14:11:58.516230125 +0200
@@ -3399,9 +33
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
