On Apr 18 2023, naoki ueda via Gcc-bugs wrote:
> The attached code says "int a = 100;", but it should normally be
> initialized with an "undefined value", but in the case of gcc-10, it is
> initialized with "0". Isn't this a bug in gcc-10?
0 is just one instance of "undefined value".
--
Andreas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109176
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a4cf0e92cbd5f18de3195fa2deb058f2f88e77e
commit r12-9421-g0a4cf0e92cbd5f18de3195fa2deb058f2f88e77e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106190
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d96422f4608c04d6a7c8444f14446c309416e24
commit r12-9424-g2d96422f4608c04d6a7c8444f14446c309416e24
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109319
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a5c0588ac00f6f55ae7ed2bb791e7e119a01c43
commit r12-9425-g6a5c0588ac00f6f55ae7ed2bb791e7e119a01c43
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109164
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c534a9e56cf16fd996c78f443b6c91f403d794ed
commit r12-9420-gc534a9e56cf16fd996c78f443b6c91f403d794ed
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e55b8e091a7263364cb08fd2c9172babb554ab1
commit r12-9428-g0e55b8e091a7263364cb08fd2c9172babb554ab1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105685
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2407495178fa20382944cdbb875e940ad109f9fb
commit r12-9422-g2407495178fa20382944cdbb875e940ad109f9fb
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:429a5143d17bd83d4662cd6c7a2c30d065c8f65b
commit r12-9423-g429a5143d17bd83d4662cd6c7a2c30d065c8f65b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109306
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c7d418661e385d7428842088b93016e2be43ce4
commit r12-9426-g1c7d418661e385d7428842088b93016e2be43ce4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109319
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE: in |[11 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105685
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] Bogus |[10/11 Regression] Bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106190
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[10/11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109176
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] internal |[11 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106879
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109540
Bug ID: 109540
Summary: Y2038: GCC gthr-posix.h weakref symbol invoking
function has impact on time values
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109540
--- Comment #1 from Puneet B ---
Here issue is weakref symbol in gcc not using the __asm_ function pointed by
pthread.h instead its calling directly ___pthread_cond_timedwait which is
exposed by version_symbol in pthread_cond_wait.c of glibc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109532
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Wilhelm M from comment #5)
> So in general a scoped-enum inside a class (nested type) maybe always a bad
> idea, because it prevents optimization.
I don't know how you have drawn that conclus
Ok, thanks!
2023年4月18日(火) 16:06 Andreas Schwab :
> On Apr 18 2023, naoki ueda via Gcc-bugs wrote:
>
> > The attached code says "int a = 100;", but it should normally be
> > initialized with an "undefined value", but in the case of gcc-10, it is
> > initialized with "0". Isn't this a bug in gcc-10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109539
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 54877
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54877&action=edit
Reduced test-case
Takes 1.77s after the mentioned revision and 0.15s before it.
The gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org list is for automated email from our Bugzilla
database, please don't use it to report bugs or to ask questions about
how GCC works.
For questions about using GCC send email to gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org and
to report bugs please use bugzilla: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107041
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109539
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109541
Bug ID: 109541
Summary: ICE in extract_constrain_insn on
sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu when building rhash-1.4.3
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109541
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Maybe a dupe of PR108703? Need to rebuild with debugging symbols as well now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109240
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2349e69125335d4c8c5e43cf3643844519d154c3
commit r14-22-g2349e69125335d4c8c5e43cf3643844519d154c3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109240
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ok, I see.
2023年4月18日(火) 17:27 Jonathan Wakely :
> The gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org list is for automated email from our Bugzilla
> database, please don't use it to report bugs or to ask questions about
> how GCC works.
>
> For questions about using GCC send email to gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org and
> to report
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109539
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is almost certainly the cost of pointers_related_p
Samples: 3M of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 3573086788171
Children Self Samples Command Shared Object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108961
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|87477 |
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109518
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109539
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So what we try to do is, when check_pointer_uses follows the use chain
of 'ptr' through say
ptr2 = ptr + 4;
then it wants to visit ptr2 uses as well. For PHIs we get to
ptr2 = PHI <..., ptr, ...>;
an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109517
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109517
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85944
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||terra at gnome dot org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109540
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. GCC 9 is no longer supported, so any changes will not help that version.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109540
--- Comment #3 from Puneet B ---
It can be reproduceable in gcc master branch or latest release..dont look at it
as GCC particular version bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109542
Bug ID: 109542
Summary: bad detection of null dereferance cause ud2a in valid
inline function code
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109543
Bug ID: 109543
Summary: Avoid using BLKmode for unions with a non-BLKmode
member when possible
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109540
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, I know. I'm just pointing out that you're reporting a bug against an
unsupported version.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109540
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The description is a bit confusing, but the issue is that we define:
typedef struct timespec __gthread_time_t;
and then use that in several functions like this:
static inline int
__gthread_cond_timedwai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109536
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Right - using std::vector in constant expressions isn't supported by debug
mode. Somebody needs to work on that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109542
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109525
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ec4ceafcc04ec7bafb1857cf6d491030440a765
commit r14-27-g4ec4ceafcc04ec7bafb1857cf6d491030440a765
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108827
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb5c71d16d0fb47638498365f5c857ce7c673eaf
commit r14-29-gcb5c71d16d0fb47638498365f5c857ce7c673eaf
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109543
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109525
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4dc8c0b62d91d239b88cc81bbb8f4fbde317fde6
commit r13-7212-g4dc8c0b62d91d239b88cc81bbb8f4fbde317fde6
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109542
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108827
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:769c324424500a3d20de7417f62a4e7bce345775
commit r13-7214-g769c324424500a3d20de7417f62a4e7bce345775
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109542
--- Comment #3 from Amos Maimon ---
1. the same will occur if you will do :
p[0xe] = 0xfc;
2. how do you explin the fact that if the null set in the function
(SIMPLE_WRITE case) gcc compile it without ud2a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109542
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Amos Maimon from comment #3)
> 1. the same will occur if you will do :
> p[0xe] = 0xfc;
Yes, it's undefined behavior too as C defines a[b] as *(a+b).
> 2. how do you explin the fact that if th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109542
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You can either perform the arithmetic using intptr_t or uintptr_t, or use
-fdelete-null-pointer-checks (as the documentation for that option explains).
Also I would expect a volatile char* to be used for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109525
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109539
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68aea7801848f978f8b5461807dfd3b7a504da1e
commit r13-7215-g68aea7801848f978f8b5461807dfd3b7a504da1e
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109539
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109539
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fdbaab2dc886f78a1e755120faa17e77c862
commit r14-30-gfdbaab2dc886f78a1e755120faa17e77c862
Author: Richard Biener
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109540
--- Comment #6 from Puneet B ---
its not after refer the wiki, its observed on target where its clear that even
after compiling application with -D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 its
still calling ___pthread_cond_timedwait
More over if i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105351
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108976
--- Comment #7 from Dimitrij Mijoski ---
I put a second version of the patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2023-March/055667.html about a month
ago.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109544
Bug ID: 109544
Summary: implicit declaration of function
'__riscv_vsseg4e8_v_i8mf8'
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109545
Bug ID: 109545
Summary: first_stmt has strange semantics
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109544
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
We don't support segment yet since segment load/store api will be changed.
For example:
The old api:
__riscv_vsseg4e8_v_i8mf8(base, vint8mf8_t v0, vint8mf8_t v1, vint8mf8_t v2,
vint8mf8_t v3, vl);
will be cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109544
Mathieu Malaterre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108786
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f548ece7abc0a0c81dd049e9f8b480ff2c38e18b
commit r14-41-gf548ece7abc0a0c81dd049e9f8b480ff2c38e18b
Author: Richard Biener
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58359
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.1.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108786
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109546
Bug ID: 109546
Summary: [13 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when
using __builtin_unreachable
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107674
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109545
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
This is fixed on current 10- through 13-branches.
I don't quite know why it hasn't been closed.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109545
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Yep, but it will for
label:
# DEBUG ...
_1 = xyz;
return 'label'. It surely depends on what the users intend (and we have
only very few). Likely the tree-vect-slp.cc case (I've only added
recently .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338
--- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #12)
> This is fixed on current 10- through 13-branches.
>
> I don't quite know why it hasn't been closed.
It still fails for me at -O1 and higher for 10-br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108969
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7c54e3f48086c29179f7765a35c381de5109a0a
commit r14-43-gb7c54e3f48086c29179f7765a35c381de5109a0a
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108969
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:762be0646bf96761ce68a9e06ab60c453e0963d0
commit r13-7217-g762be0646bf96761ce68a9e06ab60c453e0963d0
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108969
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108969
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed933888e680384e1e7af361b20dd484ad424f7d
commit r13-7218-ged933888e680384e1e7af361b20dd484ad424f7d
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108969
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6067ae4557a3a7e5b08359e78a29b8a9d5dfedce
commit r14-46-g6067ae4557a3a7e5b08359e78a29b8a9d5dfedce
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82064
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94908
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95b99e47f4f2df2d0c5680f45e3ec0a3170218ad
commit r14-47-g95b99e47f4f2df2d0c5680f45e3ec0a3170218ad
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94908
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Implemented also for x86.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32955c1c2246aa336d3fd2423c32546c39a6ca30
commit r12-9429-g32955c1c2246aa336d3fd2423c32546c39a6ca30
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107154
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2088358b658c44f69d37af0d7deec321f557741d
commit r12-9430-g2088358b658c44f69d37af0d7deec321f557741d
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108468
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b210f028ee9dd55bfd9f60ccfc2c015f73dbe930
commit r12-9433-gb210f028ee9dd55bfd9f60ccfc2c015f73dbe930
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1da2d99c632a90e5af55c8f8db1c11af587bb0a0
commit r12-9434-g1da2d99c632a90e5af55c8f8db1c11af587bb0a0
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108566
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f483dc1367294d02581e2d98c5f84be4dd67f26b
commit r12-9431-gf483dc1367294d02581e2d98c5f84be4dd67f26b
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107310
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f6d443f0d0dd8a6bab99ab1957df3cd82541b27
commit r12-9432-g0f6d443f0d0dd8a6bab99ab1957df3cd82541b27
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103871
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1da2d99c632a90e5af55c8f8db1c11af587bb0a0
commit r12-9434-g1da2d99c632a90e5af55c8f8db1c11af587bb0a0
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101869
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f9bb63c5e82512ba9e53f4d5e67949c100d8830
commit r12-9436-g2f9bb63c5e82512ba9e53f4d5e67949c100d8830
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108975
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55ab4606ab1084a55d53184c5cf4543740a7f65d
commit r12-9440-g55ab4606ab1084a55d53184c5cf4543740a7f65d
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105809
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dbd8af5d8f4568ed5683ae8aa15ccb330bbf74c0
commit r12-9438-gdbd8af5d8f4568ed5683ae8aa15ccb330bbf74c0
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105406
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6fd32842404ac1a3cd98189f61d93c5bc9c8680c
commit r12-9435-g6fd32842404ac1a3cd98189f61d93c5bc9c8680c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108242
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:890d711a2477119a34cf435f6159b6253b124374
commit r12-9437-g890d711a2477119a34cf435f6159b6253b124374
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109357
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69410
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:615c48b317397c2dc3d6769954d5c399ea882f7a
commit r12-9439-g615c48b317397c2dc3d6769954d5c399ea882f7a
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107154
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106890
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94569d91bd4c604da755b4aae84256e7fe21196a
commit r12-9441-g94569d91bd4c604da755b4aae84256e7fe21196a
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105481
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab7c0a44ca9e913af654ae82963565d61d8bb39f
commit r12-9443-gab7c0a44ca9e913af654ae82963565d61d8bb39f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105996
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12d7fb7e5810cc5e394d3cbea43d1b19ea7f9348
commit r12-9442-g12d7fb7e5810cc5e394d3cbea43d1b19ea7f9348
Author: Jason Merrill
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo