[Bug c++/109084] [10/11/12/13 Regression] requires keyword can't access private static constexpr bool in templated class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109084 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug fortran/109066] Segfault when using defined assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109066 --- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Steve, Indeed - I found that paragraph shortly after writing. Thanks for posting it. Cheers Paul On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 15:33, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.or

[Bug rtl-optimization/109086] Bug of builtin_strcmp in the case of using the adddi3 instruction patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109086 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||loongarch Keywords|

[Bug target/109085] [13 Regression] Maybe a wrong code in fmt package since r13-6361-g8020c9c42349f51f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109085 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/fmtlib/f

[Bug c/109087] New: csmith: end of year runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087 Bug ID: 109087 Summary: csmith: end of year runtime bug ? Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c As

[Bug c/109087] csmith: end of year runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Git range seems to be g:d0a3d55ae4a2656f .. g:4f1314f547f69d3a, which is about 533 commits. Trying a bisect.

[Bug target/109072] [12/13 Regression] SLP costs for vec duplicate too high since g:4963079769c99c4073adfd799885410ad484cbbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109072 --- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > Whatever you do with cost heuristics you'll find a testcase where that > regresses. Yep. That's the one true invariant of costing :-) I think a

[Bug tree-optimization/109008] [13 Regression] Wrong code in scipy package since r13-3926-gd4c2f1d376da6f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109008 --- Comment #48 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1d5c729ceeb112af26e3298314a0de3058f1d82 commit r13-6574-ga1d5c729ceeb112af26e3298314a0de3058f1d82 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c/108079] [10/11/12/13 Regression] -Wunused-variable gives misleading duplicate warning for unused static local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108079 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c63cc7268fd5615997989f153e9405d0f5aaa50 commit r13-6575-g2c63cc7268fd5615997989f153e9405d0f5aaa50 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug c/108079] [10/11/12 Regression] -Wunused-variable gives misleading duplicate warning for unused static local variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108079 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression]

[Bug other/108464] [13 Regression] Broken -fdebug-prefix-map since r13-3599

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108464 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2eb0191aa104badf3cab127f7f87d371c0fef92b commit r13-6576-g2eb0191aa104badf3cab127f7f87d371c0fef92b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug other/108464] [13 Regression] Broken -fdebug-prefix-map since r13-3599

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108464 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/109088] New: GCC fail auto-vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109088 Bug ID: 109088 Summary: GCC fail auto-vectorization Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee

[Bug rtl-optimization/109086] Bug of builtin_strcmp in the case of using the adddi3 instruction patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109086 --- Comment #3 from liwei at loongson dot cn --- Thank you for your quick reply! The final call of the expand_simple_binop function returns part of the code as follows (optabs.cc): 1671 xop0 = widen_operand (xop0, wider_mode, mode, unsignedp,

[Bug plugins/108634] [13 regression] 'undefined symbol: tree_code_type' when building kernel GCC plugins since r13-5431-gb0241ce6e37031

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108634 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c599ae6e081496466cada6f97b0d4687a6d765a commit r13-6577-g4c599ae6e081496466cada6f97b0d4687a6d765a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug target/109069] [12/13 Regression] Vector truncation test program produces incorrect result since r12-6537-g080a06fcb076b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109069 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Vector truncation test |[12/13 Regression] Vector

[Bug target/107998] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998 --- Comment #23 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Yong : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3f8dfcd885d19d322b10fb4e36d50b60da2576b commit r13-6578-ge3f8dfcd885d19d322b10fb4e36d50b60da2576b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/107998] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/109074] SIGABRT signal without using -lpthread at Linux RHEL 7.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109074 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- You need to use -pthread to use std::thread. That's what the exception is telling you. Catching the exception doesn't solve the problem. Use -pthread.

[Bug c++/108099] [12 Regression] ICE with type alias with `signed __int128_t`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- What about the #c9 and #c10 testcases and questions on their behavior? Defer that to GCC 14 as it isn't a regression?

[Bug libstdc++/109064] Maximum recursion depth exceeded in std::shared_ptr xmethod

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109064 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/109088] GCC fail auto-vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109088 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- Please read https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ on how to correctly report a bug.

[Bug c/109087] csmith: end of year runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Git range seems to be g:a996888327c2248b .. g:4f1314f547f69d3a, which is 134 commits.

[Bug libstdc++/109064] Maximum recursion depth exceeded in std::shared_ptr xmethod

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109064 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Unfortunately in the testsuite those errors cause the test to be ignored as UNSUPPORTED, instead of making it FAIL: Python Exception : maximum recursion depth exceeded^M skipping: Python Exception : maxim

[Bug libstdc++/109064] Maximum recursion depth exceeded in std::shared_ptr xmethod

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109064 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37c8a083d44f8123ad81a3cd411389b0b7b42ae6 commit r13-6579-g37c8a083d44f8123ad81a3cd411389b0b7b42ae6 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/109064] Maximum recursion depth exceeded in std::shared_ptr xmethod

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109064 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk for now but backports to follow.

[Bug tree-optimization/109008] [13 Regression] Wrong code in scipy package since r13-3926-gd4c2f1d376da6f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109008 --- Comment #49 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44f80a370b76fd1564e280f08d6640d0f641d487 commit r13-6580-g44f80a370b76fd1564e280f08d6640d0f641d487 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c/109087] csmith: end of year runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- Git range now seems to be g:a996888327c2248b .. g:0cb5d7cdbab8e5f8, which is 33 commits.

[Bug c/109087] csmith: end of year runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- Git range seems to be g:37d8312f560f1e2f .. g:0cb5d7cdbab8e5f8, which is 9 commits. No hot candidate yet.

[Bug modula2/109089] New: implementation of boolean should be C++/C bool rather than int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109089 Bug ID: 109089 Summary: implementation of boolean should be C++/C bool rather than int Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug modula2/109089] implementation of boolean should be C++/C bool rather than int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109089 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-10 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/108892] [13 Regression] unable to generate reloads for at -Og on riscv64 since r13-4907

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108892 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/109088] GCC fail auto-vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109088 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Component

[Bug c/109087] csmith: end of year runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- First bad commit seems to be: eef81eefcdc2a58111e50eb2162ea1f5becc8004 is the first bad commit commit eef81eefcdc2a58111e50eb2162ea1f5becc8004 Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Thu Dec 22 10:55:46 2022 +0100

[Bug c/109087] [13 Regression] csmith: end of year runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Summary|csmith: end of

[Bug target/109087] [13 Regression] csmith: end of year runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/109086] Bug of builtin_strcmp in the case of using the adddi3 instruction patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109086 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to liwei from comment #3) > Thank you for your quick reply! > > The final call of the expand_simple_binop function returns part of the code > as follows (optabs.cc): > > 1671 xop0 = widen_opera

[Bug modula2/109089] implementation of boolean should be C++/C bool rather than int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109089 --- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley --- Created attachment 54634 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54634&action=edit Proposed fix Here is the proposed patch which has been bootstrapped on ppc64le, x86_64, armv7l, aarch64, debian

[Bug tree-optimization/109088] GCC fail auto-vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109088 --- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > I think we can do conditional reduction but maybe not for variable-length > vectors? Otherwise I'm sure there's a duplicate bug about this. No, GCC still can not

[Bug analyzer/109060] -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check false positives seen in haproxy's cfgparse.c: parse_process_number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109060 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4fd232f9843bb800548a906653aeb0723cdb411 commit r13-6581-gc4fd232f9843bb800548a906653aeb0723cdb411 Author: David Malcolm Date: F

[Bug analyzer/108475] -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check false positives seen in haproxy's tcpcheck.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108475 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4fd232f9843bb800548a906653aeb0723cdb411 commit r13-6581-gc4fd232f9843bb800548a906653aeb0723cdb411 Author: David Malcolm Date: F

[Bug c++/108566] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have 'field_decl' in write_unqualified_name with anonymous struct inside an anonym

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108566 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1c8cf9006bd278e969ab7ed35178067ce128f32 commit r13-6582-ge1c8cf9006bd278e969ab7ed35178067ce128f32 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Th

[Bug c++/108566] [11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have 'field_decl' in write_unqualified_name with anonymous struct inside an anonymous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108566 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE: |[11/12 Regression] ICE:

[Bug analyzer/108475] -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check false positives seen in haproxy's tcpcheck.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108475 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/109060] -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check false positives seen in haproxy's cfgparse.c: parse_process_number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109060 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/108542] [13 Regression] ICE in instantiate_type, at cp/class.cc:8833

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108542 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/109088] GCC fail auto-vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109088 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 54635 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54635&action=edit testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/109088] GCC does not always vectorize conditional reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109088 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-10 Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/109041] Bogus compile time check by __builtin_memset? error: ‘__builtin_memset’ writing 4 bytes into a region of size 0 overflows the destination [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109041 --- Comment #9 from ishikawa,chiaki --- Thank you for the confirmation for the fix in GCC-12. Now I have to figure out how GCC-12 seems to miscompile something in Thunderbird mail client to report a run-time assertion error. (Compiling Thunderb

[Bug target/108910] [12/13 Regression] Further ICE in aarch64_layout_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108910 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug target/108910] [12/13 Regression] Further ICE in aarch64_layout_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108910 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #9) > So is it expected that the alignment of TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT(type) is 512? Yes, it is. aligned attribute on non-aggregate types create a distinct type, and TYP

[Bug c/109090] New: UBSan signed integer overflow check missing.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109090 Bug ID: 109090 Summary: UBSan signed integer overflow check missing. Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/109087] [13 Regression] csmith: end of year runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/109090] [10/11/12/13 Regression] UBSan signed integer overflow check missing.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109090 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug sanitizer/109090] [10/11/12/13 Regression] UBSan signed integer overflow check missing.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109090 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r8-343-g2bf54d93f15921 it seems: commit 2bf54d93f159210d0c05a07c655eb847c069365c Author: Richard Biener Date: Tue May 2 12:43:47 2017 + common.opt (fstrict-overflow): Alias negative

[Bug sanitizer/109090] [10/11/12/13 Regression] UBSan signed integer overflow check missing.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109090 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- A dup of PR108995?

[Bug sanitizer/109090] [10/11/12/13 Regression] UBSan signed integer overflow check missing.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109090 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Dunno, this doesn't seem to be fixed by the patch in PR108995.

[Bug tree-optimization/109071] -Warray-bounds warning when array index checked via inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109071 qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/109091] New: AIX: thread_local is not being internally linked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109091 Bug ID: 109091 Summary: AIX: thread_local is not being internally linked Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug target/108910] [12/13 Regression] Further ICE in aarch64_layout_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108910 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- To be exact, it is more complicated than that. Some types with extra types are created using build_variant_type_copy and so their TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT is without the attributes. Example is handle_aligned_attri

[Bug c++/92851] Lambda capture of *this with mutable is not mutable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92851 --- Comment #3 from Kohei Takahashi --- It's still rejected in GCC 13.0. https://wandbox.org/permlink/jKItc5W8KnYR7JN1

[Bug c++/107532] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532 --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek --- Hmm, so it's this line const FrameMetadata::Plane &meta = buffer->metadata().planes()[i]; and we complain because we have libcamera::Span::operator[] (&TARGET_EXPR (buffer)>))>, (size_type) VIEW_CONVERT_

[Bug c++/107532] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely --- Span is a view, so it is like reference-wrapper. The lifetime of the underlying data is not tied to the lifetime of the Span.

[Bug analyzer/109059] -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false +ve seen on haproxy's cfgparse.c: cfg_register_postparser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109059 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14f5e56a8a766c6f48c2a07b301fce2db1a19a3c commit r13-6589-g14f5e56a8a766c6f48c2a07b301fce2db1a19a3c Author: David Malcolm Date: F

[Bug target/109087] [13 Regression] csmith: end of year runtime bug since r13-4839-geef81eefcdc2a581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7) > With gcc pr109087.c -w -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -g -O3 -march=znver3 > -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-tree-vectorize -fno-tree-slp-vectorize > it started with r13-

[Bug c++/107532] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532 --- Comment #17 from Barnabás Pőcze --- The simple test case with std::span still triggers the warning: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/43cKxdqr3. I feel that without deeper code analysis such a warning will generate too many false positives and peopl

[Bug analyzer/109059] -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false +ve seen on haproxy's cfgparse.c: cfg_register_postparser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109059 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-10 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libgomp/90596] 'GOACC_parallel_keyed' should use 'GOMP_MAP_VARS_TARGET'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90596 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8332e52a498df480f72303de32ad0751ad899fe commit r13-6590-gf8332e52a498df480f72303de32ad0751ad899fe Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug target/109087] [13 Regression] csmith: end of year runtime bug since r13-4839-geef81eefcdc2a581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087 --- Comment #9 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > Try -fno-tree-vectorize? I tried that, and it made no difference at all. I also tried dropping the -march= setting back to znver1 and that also made no diff

[Bug c++/107532] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532 --- Comment #18 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #16) > Span is a view, so it is like reference-wrapper. The lifetime of the > underlying data is not tied to the lifetime of the Span. Aha, I could add a check for

[Bug target/108994] [13 Regression] LLVM JIT segfaults in libgcc after upgrading from gcc 12.2.1 to 13.0.1 since r13-2706-g6e80a1d164d1f9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108994 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- So I guess the primary question would be, are threads involved in the reproducer or not? All the backtraces don't include start_thread, so the crashes are from the initial thread, but that doesn't mean othe

[Bug c++/107532] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532 --- Comment #19 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Barnabás Pőcze from comment #17) > The simple test case with std::span still triggers the warning: > https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/43cKxdqr3. I feel that without deeper code > analysis such a warni

[Bug target/109087] [13 Regression] csmith: end of year runtime bug since r13-4839-geef81eefcdc2a581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109087 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #9) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > > Try -fno-tree-vectorize? > > I tried that, and it made no difference at all. > > I also tried dropping the

[Bug rtl-optimization/109092] New: [13 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1932 when building libgcc on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109092 Bug ID: 109092 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1932 when building libgcc on riscv64 Product: gcc

[Bug c/109093] New: csmith: a February runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093 Bug ID: 109093 Summary: csmith: a February runtime bug ? Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Ass

[Bug target/109092] [13 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1932 when building libgcc on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109092 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-10 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/108994] [13 Regression] LLVM JIT segfaults in libgcc after upgrading from gcc 12.2.1 to 13.0.1 since r13-2706-g6e80a1d164d1f9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108994 --- Comment #16 from Tom Stellard --- I looked into this a little more, and I think the s390x failures may be an LLVM bug. It's trying to JIT an X86 ELF file on s390x, and I think maybe the layout of the frames is different due to endianness.

[Bug target/108874] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Missing bswap detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108874 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fcbc5c190c40b51c82f827830ce403c07d628960 commit r13-6591-gfcbc5c190c40b51c82f827830ce403c07d628960 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: F

[Bug tree-optimization/94094] [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94094 Bug 94094 depends on bug 108874, which changed state. Bug 108874 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] Missing bswap detection https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108874 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/108874] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Missing bswap detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108874 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/108933] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Missing bswap detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108933 Bug 108933 depends on bug 108874, which changed state. Bug 108874 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] Missing bswap detection https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108874 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/108938] Missing bswap detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108938 Bug 108938 depends on bug 108874, which changed state. Bug 108874 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] Missing bswap detection https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108874 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/104332] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in resolve_symbol, at fortran/resolve.cc:15815

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104332 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e20e5d9dc11b64e8eabce6803c91cb5768207083 commit r13-6592-ge20e5d9dc11b64e8eabce6803c91cb5768207083 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: T

[Bug libstdc++/108882] [13 Regression] Wrong symver on 4 new libstdc++ symbols on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108882 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/109050] UBsan failed to detect out-of-bound at -O0/1/2/s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109050 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d0baeae315ebe7d0ec7682ea3e7c0516027c2b8 commit r13-6593-g4d0baeae315ebe7d0ec7682ea3e7c0516027c2b8 Author: Marek Polacek Date: We

[Bug sanitizer/108060] [10/11/12/13 Regression] UBsan missed an out-of-bound bug at -O0 since r7-1900-g8a1b7b7fd75a3847

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108060 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d0baeae315ebe7d0ec7682ea3e7c0516027c2b8 commit r13-6593-g4d0baeae315ebe7d0ec7682ea3e7c0516027c2b8 Author: Marek Polacek Date: We

[Bug sanitizer/108060] [10/11/12 Regression] UBsan missed an out-of-bound bug at -O0 since r7-1900-g8a1b7b7fd75a3847

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108060 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression] UBsan

[Bug c++/108972] [13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'error_mark' in compare_lambda_template_head, at cp/lambda.cc:1551 since r13-3601-g2b0e81d5c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108972 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a915c29a7d63ccb88cfded75ba1c8c4919845e98 commit r13-6594-ga915c29a7d63ccb88cfded75ba1c8c4919845e98 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Th

[Bug c++/108972] [13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'error_mark' in compare_lambda_template_head, at cp/lambda.cc:1551 since r13-3601-g2b0e81d5c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108972 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/109093] csmith: a February runtime bug ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109093 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Current git range is g:7478278f88ba1753 .. g:fea34ee491104f32 This is 7 commits. 6 of them seem to be libstdc++ and then there is this one: commit 866555b170016c49beb869a78cbecdeb07c63135 Author: Jakub J

[Bug c++/108179] [11/12/13 regression] ICE related to template template parameters in tsubst, at cp/pt.cc:15782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108179 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/92342] [10/11/12 Regression] a small missed transformation into x?b:0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92342 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|10.5

[Bug c++/109039] [12/13 Regression] Miscompilation with no_unique_address and bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109039 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:991f9eb2da3a268b7b08346761fa0078ab55f506 commit r13-6596-g991f9eb2da3a268b7b08346761fa0078ab55f506 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug c++/107558] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in fld_incomplete_type_of with -fmerge-all-constants and openmp and LTO since r11-16-ga2f32550a085984f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107558 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60b6f5c0a334db3f8f6dffaf0b9aab42fd5c54a2 commit r13-6597-g60b6f5c0a334db3f8f6dffaf0b9aab42fd5c54a2 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug target/107703] TImode to __bf16 conversions and __bf16 to TImode conversions aren't implemented in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107703 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:246127ab238bac6aa71a9b4ee1f6fabf776b5ccb commit r13-6598-g246127ab238bac6aa71a9b4ee1f6fabf776b5ccb Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug target/107703] TImode to __bf16 conversions and __bf16 to TImode conversions aren't implemented in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107703 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c227508d06a63f9b8fede3fd88813accb447060e commit r13-6599-gc227508d06a63f9b8fede3fd88813accb447060e Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug c++/109039] [12 Regression] Miscompilation with no_unique_address and bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109039 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression] |Misc

[Bug c++/107558] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in fld_incomplete_type_of with -fmerge-all-constants and openmp and LTO since r11-16-ga2f32550a085984f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107558 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/107703] TImode to __bf16 conversions and __bf16 to TImode conversions aren't implemented in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107703 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/103725] [10/11/12/13 Regression] warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when simplifying conditional to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103725 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #6 from And

  1   2   >