https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108865
--- Comment #7 from Costas Argyris ---
I think the problem is that the embedding of the manifest into the executable
is a very low-level process that depends on ms specifics that mt.exe (or VS)
knows about and windres + link doesn't.
For exampl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108975
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54560
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54560&action=edit
Original unreduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108865
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Costas Argyris from comment #7)
> I couldn't find examples online for doing this.There are examples of
> compiling and linking resource files in general using GNU tools, but not a
> resourc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108974
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108974
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
"is_nothrow_invocable_v shall be true."
Failing to meet that requirement is undefined, so we're not required to reject
it as ill-formed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108865
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://github.com/jbruchon/jdupes
Suggest this is definitely possible. That program includes a manifest that say
that the program supports long file names.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108975
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Trying to reduce this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108865
--- Comment #10 from Costas Argyris ---
The only interesting bit I found there was the shell script that gets called
before actually running windres:
https://github.com/jbruchon/jdupes/blob/master/Makefile#L201
which is doing some setup:
http
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106609
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #16 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108976
Bug ID: 108976
Summary: codecvt for Unicode allows surrogate code points
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108977
Bug ID: 108977
Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr96373.c fails
after r11-10549-gcf3d95cce379f3 on power 10
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108315
--- Comment #9 from Rui Ueyama ---
I'm the maintainer of the mold linker. I didn't implement that POWER10 ABI
because I didn't have an access to a POWER10 machine and therefore couldn't
verify the correctness of my implementation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97923
Xionghu Luo (luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yinyuefengyi at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97923
--- Comment #6 from Xionghu Luo (luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org) ---
below changes could fix the incorrect location
diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.cc b/gcc/gimplify.cc
index 96845154a92..2dc8608dedf 100644
--- a/gcc/gimplify.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimplify.cc
@@ -3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108978
Bug ID: 108978
Summary: Add __builtin_FILE_NAME() which behaves like the
__FILE_NAME__ macro
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108978
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93680
Xionghu Luo (luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yinyuefengyi at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108978
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54561
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54561&action=edit
quick patch
This is a quick hacked patch which adds this. I didn't even test it or add
testcases. It might not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108978
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108979
Bug ID: 108979
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at
tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:248
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108979
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108977
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108977
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #1)
> The newly added test case requires Richard's commit r13-5979 to pass. This
> should be fixed once that commit gets fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103784
--- Comment #9 from Surya Kumari Jangala ---
The same issue of unnecessary rldicl instruction is there if we change return
value from bool to int.
int foo (int a, int b)
{
if (a > 2)
return 0;
if (b < 10)
return 1;
return 0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108980
Bug ID: 108980
Summary: Warning text missing the warning itself (GCC 13)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108980
--- Comment #1 from Thiago Macieira ---
GCC 13 (trunk) built today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108980
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The problem is obviously in array_bounds_checker::check_array_ref .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108980
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Warning text missing the|[13 Regression] Warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108980
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108980
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54562
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54562&action=edit
Patch which I think is correct but not 100% sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108240
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:392f399ae0595e6b4433c18900cc67991fb140f4
commit r13-6383-g392f399ae0595e6b4433c18900cc67991fb140f4
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue Feb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108981
Bug ID: 108981
Summary: Raise errors for cpu type without powerpc64 support.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January
/6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108981
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |diagnostic
Depends on|108240
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415
Bug 108415 depends on bug 108240, which changed state.
Bug 108240 Summary: [13 Regression] Error message missing since
r13-4894-gacc727cf02a144 (then make concealed ICE exposed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108240
Wha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108240
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108727
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108729
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108982
Bug ID: 108982
Summary: While recompiling when even we modify any line in got
its giving error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108982
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
First off 4.8.x has not been supported for around 5 years now so there is not
much we can do plus since this is also from a binary build of gcc you should
ask where you got gcc from for support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108982
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Third you might need to run fix includes again after doing the install.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108950
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3837b6f6c28a1d2cea3a69efbda795ea3fb8816
commit r13-6384-ge3837b6f6c28a1d2cea3a69efbda795ea3fb8816
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108970
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108971
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108982
--- Comment #3 from vinay kumar ---
Hi Andrew Pinski
Currently we upgraded from 4.2 to 4.8.3.
we used rpm to upgrade GCC to 4.8.3 with below command.
rpm -ivh gcc-cpp-8-1.aix7.1.ppc.rpm
Validation
gcc --version(4.8.3)
we are trying to ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108972
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108977
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108979
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108980
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108982
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 149 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
