https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108796
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108796
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Sorry, for completeness, I meant to include:
```
$ gcc-12 -O2 /tmp/foo.c # ditto with -std=c89
/tmp/foo.c:3:1: warning: 'noreturn' attribute ignored [-Wattributes]
3 | [[noreturn]] void foo(void) {
| ^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108796
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Sam James --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101682
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #7 from S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108796
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108796
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GCC 13 accepts [[noreturn]] |Can't intermix C2x and GNU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69585
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
I see this only changed the C++ front-end. sudo just ran into a similar issue
for the C front-end, see PR 108796.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107096
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
>
> There's no other way to do N bit to two N/2 bit hi/lo (un)packing
> (there's a 2x N/2 bit -> N bit operation, for whatever reason).
> There's also no way to transform the d rgroup mask into the
> f rgro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107096
--- Comment #11 from Hongtao.liu ---
>
> There's no other way to do N bit to two N/2 bit hi/lo (un)packing
> (there's a 2x N/2 bit -> N bit operation, for whatever reason).
> There's also no way to transform the d rgroup mask into the
> f rgro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107096
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107096
>
> --- Comment #11 from Hongtao.liu ---
>
> >
> > There's no other way to do N bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108738
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec23e9e25eb64bb066dc408fd498861b8587bec8
commit r13-5994-gec23e9e25eb64bb066dc408fd498861b8587bec8
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108738
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1dfac7e71056e879f101fef1c5ecb8ff6be1a1f
commit r13-5995-ge1dfac7e71056e879f101fef1c5ecb8ff6be1a1f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108797
Bug ID: 108797
Summary: libstdc++: Inconsistent noexcept-specific for valarray
begin/end
Product: gcc
Version: 9.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108797
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108797
--- Comment #2 from Holger Kaelberer ---
I expected that. Just for reference: Where can I find release-planning for
specific releases/xxx branches of gcc?
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo