https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108743
--- Comment #4 from Pierre Ossman ---
I am indeed trying to compile for macOS. Specifically Qt5, which is designed
with just Xcode in mind.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108743
--- Comment #5 from Pierre Ossman ---
Could you consider adding -fconstant-cfstrings as an alias? It would make life
easier for making build systems compiler agnostic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100758
--- Comment #22 from Martin Liška ---
Thank you Jakub, please revert my documentation patch if you are convinced
enough the change works only on old VIA CPUs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77760
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #5)
> As for tm bits, my suggestion was to overwrite tm fields internally, not to
> expose that externally. They'd be used as scratch bits. As in, member
> function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108696
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #2)
> Created attachment 54437 [details]
> possible patch
>
> This patch should successfully short circuit unnecessary checks. untested in
> compiler.i
>
> Where d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108685
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108743
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108737
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I think this is another case where control dependences do not work as intended.
Marking useful stmt: foo ();
and we have
[local count: 3508266]:
x_4 = foo ();
if (x_4 != 0)
goto ; [33.00%]
e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108734
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #5)
> __has_builtin() does not mean that the builtin is inlined. It only means
> that GCC recognizes the builtin. That is how __has_builtin() is documented.
> In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108687
--- Comment #10 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus ---
Can confirm the attached patch solves this issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100758
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jeline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108748
Bug ID: 108748
Summary: Enhancement: track ranges of poly_int indeterminates
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108724
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108724
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|Poor codegen whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108749
Bug ID: 108749
Summary: [OpenMP][C/C++/Fortran] inscan reduction modifier
rejected for combined/composite constructs of
simd/for/do
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106249
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108749
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
We implement the 5.0 wording which was quite clear that only the selected
combined/composite constructs are allowed for it. The clause handling wording
was added without considering the former (it wasn't in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108718
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Huh, the change for sure triggered some latent issue, either in the testcase or
in GCC. More analysis is needed (the testcase is large and obfuscated...).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108750
Bug ID: 108750
Summary: Loop unswitching fails for poly_int conditions
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108751
Bug ID: 108751
Summary: Removing dead code results in worse optimization at
-Os
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108749
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually, I don't see how inscan be implemented on taskloop, so I'd say both
5.1 and 5.2 are wrong and it should be neither distribute nor taskloop are
constituent.
#pragma omp target parallel for
#pra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108751
--- Comment #1 from Theodoros Theodoridis ---
I am not sure if this qualifies as a "bug"/missed optimization but I'd be
interested in understanding why these changes cause such a difference. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108749
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Actually, I don't see how inscan be implemented on taskloop
The proposed extension of the restriction is now tracked in the OpenMP
specification Issue 3489.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108749
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Perhaps it is implementable also for taskloop, but with a lot of work.
The way how e.g. for/do works with inscan is that the two parts of the loop are
split up, and one essentially gets two worksharing loops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108724
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc87e1391c55c666c7ff39d4f0dea87666f25468
commit r13-5771-gdc87e1391c55c666c7ff39d4f0dea87666f25468
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108724
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.0
Summary|[11/12/13 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108752
Bug ID: 108752
Summary: word_mode vectorization is pessimized by hard limit on
nunits
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108752
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108752
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 54447
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54447&action=edit
prototype
Prototype patch. Would benefit from a vect_finish_stmt_generation with
a gimple_seq overload and u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105593
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108279
--- Comment #24 from Michael_S ---
(In reply to Michael_S from comment #22)
> (In reply to Michael_S from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6)
> > > And there will have to be a decision about 32-bit targets.
> > >
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108753
Bug ID: 108753
Summary: '-Wduplicated-cond' doesn't diagnose duplicated
subexpressions
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108750
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108748
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108500
--- Comment #20 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> Thanks for the new testcase. With -O0 (and a --enable-checking=release
> built compiler) this builds in ~11 minutes (on a Ryzen 9 7900X) with
>
> integr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108748
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> That said, we'd track a "virtual" variables range here. For the above
> I wonder why we cannot constant fold it - [16, 16] can never be 2, no?
H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108520
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99f3ad2e5b117ee79a6dcf97288261e2fa32ab4c
commit r13-5806-g99f3ad2e5b117ee79a6dcf97288261e2fa32ab4c
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108687
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6493b7af37e473a89c67afab474330f931dd8447
commit r13-5807-g6493b7af37e473a89c67afab474330f931dd8447
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108696
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
>
> That said, not allocating the self-relation bitmaps at query time is
> definitely good (not 100% sure if the patch achieves that).
If it can determine ah
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108520
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108687
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108705
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Macleod ---
This fix I just checked in for 108687 exhibited similar performance
characteristics, also in the same pass.. Perhaps it will fix your problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108753
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105593
--- Comment #23 from Marek Polacek ---
I'm somewhat uneasy about backporting PR102633, to be honest. But I could try
and test gcc 12 to see if it causes any problems, if you want me to.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105593
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #23)
> I'm somewhat uneasy about backporting PR102633, to be honest. But I could
> try and test gcc 12 to see if it causes any problems, if you want me to.
I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> Well, it's fixed since r13-3639-ga4cd2389276a30c3 which is a revision that
> handles default options. Is it really fixed?
Ah, that commit explains that this is n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105593
--- Comment #25 from Marek Polacek ---
Okay, let me test the backport then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102633
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 102633, which changed state.
Bug 102633 Summary: [11/12 Regression] warning for self-initialization despite
-Wno-init-self
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102633
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105593
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #25)
> Okay, let me test the backport then.
Well, I already have 40 backports in my 12 tree, so could add your commit and
the 3 from this PR above it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105593
--- Comment #27 from Marek Polacek ---
Ah, I'm not even sure if it applies cleanly but if it does, go ahead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105593
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #27)
> Ah, I'm not even sure if it applies cleanly but if it does, go ahead.
It does apply cleanly, and the new c-c++-common/Winit-self1.c FAILs without it
and PASSe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108705
--- Comment #9 from Rimvydas (RJ) ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #8)
> This fix I just checked in for 108687 exhibited similar performance
> characteristics, also in the same pass.. Perhaps it will fix your problem.
Thank you! Wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108743
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm,
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/b4f496f4-f31d-41d2-8942-1f0aefbd7...@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk/
Seems didn't get installed even though it was approved ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105841
--- Comment #9 from Mike Spertus ---
Hi Jason,
Very exciting. Some additional tests: Both versions of
https://godbolt.org/z/aM93PEWcz should be included in the tests. There are
two versions of the deduction guides in the godbolt. Either guide sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108754
Bug ID: 108754
Summary: [13 Regression] multiple testsuite errors with
r13-5761-g10827a92f1a8c3
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108754
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108500
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c5154d0f0d2185b518465b264ca17fb7c60c1e8
commit r13-5808-g3c5154d0f0d2185b518465b264ca17fb7c60c1e8
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108754
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I think the problem is that cris uses the old reload pass. Could you check the
following patch:
diff --git a/gcc/ira.cc b/gcc/ira.cc
index d0b6ea062e8..9f9af808f63 100644
--- a/gcc/ira.cc
+++ b/gcc/ira.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108751
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108718
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108754
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Diff of .s for mzero3 at -O2:
--- /x/0/gccobj/gcc/testsuite/gcc/mzero3.x2-mzero3.s2023-02-10
17:57:56.786279467 +0100
+++ /x/1/gccobj/gcc/testsuite/gcc/mzero3.x2-mzero3.s2023-02-10
17:57:06.0839
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108754
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #1)
> I think the problem is that cris uses the old reload pass. Could you check
> the following patch:
Will do, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108754
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #3)
> (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #1)
> > I think the problem is that cris uses the old reload pass. Could you check
> > the following patch:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108754
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 54450
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54450&action=edit
suggested change
Here's the exact patch I'm testing, on top of the mentioned commit.
(In submittable form
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108605
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108754
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7757567358a84c3774cb972350bd7ea299daaa8d
commit r13-5809-g7757567358a84c3774cb972350bd7ea299daaa8d
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107127
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b585bd941ea2e5c1cca52e40210483b556ce2ed7
commit r12-9120-gb585bd941ea2e5c1cca52e40210483b556ce2ed7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85a84ce2e502b820277dbb399c43d4ced291efca
commit r12-9123-g85a84ce2e502b820277dbb399c43d4ced291efca
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107127
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80010acd052ca7fe544740144756cf9fc2fad629
commit r12-9121-g80010acd052ca7fe544740144756cf9fc2fad629
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106751
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4db6e1bf2f1647521dcd709bc3673f565fc327a5
commit r12-9128-g4db6e1bf2f1647521dcd709bc3673f565fc327a5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107317
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff185dd96ac4576e722b39fc0f7026281de06eb2
commit r12-9122-gff185dd96ac4576e722b39fc0f7026281de06eb2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106719
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed8e7ece850bab599c15db3d43041b70d9e99237
commit r12-9124-ged8e7ece850bab599c15db3d43041b70d9e99237
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108068
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29ac1dcd36901a094f7d698bbe244489a58e2715
commit r12-9134-g29ac1dcd36901a094f7d698bbe244489a58e2715
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107065
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bc1ee711eeab4b0d55463cd153747d30c69225c7
commit r12-9127-gbc1ee711eeab4b0d55463cd153747d30c69225c7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108206
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7048e8c1073fcf2bf6be1a3d079393a78864ca61
commit r12-9137-g7048e8c1073fcf2bf6be1a3d079393a78864ca61
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108596
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e365bfacf2617403f6bc6aa79a45a27bdba8da36
commit r12-9146-ge365bfacf2617403f6bc6aa79a45a27bdba8da36
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108286
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5de999df9fa0134a1621b552eb2abd65a6384ffd
commit r12-9138-g5de999df9fa0134a1621b552eb2abd65a6384ffd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108349
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:463bf7cfb0b03d9e75754ea8ba89c61186d0982f
commit r12-9139-g463bf7cfb0b03d9e75754ea8ba89c61186d0982f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108599
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d7f275ebe7295264a0406876c0670e25a50169a
commit r12-9147-g7d7f275ebe7295264a0406876c0670e25a50169a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108095
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e54e5a2bba69dc7fcbc88fe8cb20c91aaafabd2
commit r12-9126-g7e54e5a2bba69dc7fcbc88fe8cb20c91aaafabd2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89daf0dd6f1748077c03fbeb27ca5980a0b9abd5
commit r12-9125-g89daf0dd6f1748077c03fbeb27ca5980a0b9abd5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105972
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2b33b330c16a97627e987c60a6ca35ed0fdea56
commit r12-9140-gc2b33b330c16a97627e987c60a6ca35ed0fdea56
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108692
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00136f439e2849af2bfd9934d79a8297ab09a1d9
commit r12-9152-g00136f439e2849af2bfd9934d79a8297ab09a1d9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108498
--- Comment #27 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:671b7c29dd666cb74dfe5ab01b501d6a0ca7b41c
commit r12-9144-g671b7c29dd666cb74dfe5ab01b501d6a0ca7b41c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108151
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4f6149fe272101af6de3a19be4e41d0e77e7f6c
commit r12-9130-ge4f6149fe272101af6de3a19be4e41d0e77e7f6c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108151
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4430147d3779d8f089d8eb765b4c7e0333279424
commit r12-9129-g4430147d3779d8f089d8eb765b4c7e0333279424
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108607
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a62d952064c896eaf94e70d7999e6e27343babcf
commit r12-9148-ga62d952064c896eaf94e70d7999e6e27343babcf
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108193
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb8022eab6d076325495360da632321078326135
commit r12-9132-gcb8022eab6d076325495360da632321078326135
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106523
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a558a4d3d1b488783b96dff7141d12e02ded3ad3
commit r12-9157-ga558a4d3d1b488783b96dff7141d12e02ded3ad3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108180
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4b8949a3ad0a2259388841f3c833876a19bd2a2
commit r12-9131-gc4b8949a3ad0a2259388841f3c833876a19bd2a2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108440
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a015ebe382cd6d0beab9db4ad33fbd252b7e2339
commit r12-9158-ga015ebe382cd6d0beab9db4ad33fbd252b7e2339
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108573
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bd8b65bd5d51a33f31ec39dfb435b84e36260e9
commit r12-9149-g7bd8b65bd5d51a33f31ec39dfb435b84e36260e9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108264
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee25e54233c6a1548eda06aa9a11f09cd7eb32ac
commit r12-9135-gee25e54233c6a1548eda06aa9a11f09cd7eb32ac
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108166
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86d252ab555d487aefb616562e770ffa46e05b01
commit r12-9133-g86d252ab555d487aefb616562e770ffa46e05b01
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102633
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aabebf76e9d9a805ea5b443d4ee4f49f13155d87
commit r12-9160-gaabebf76e9d9a805ea5b443d4ee4f49f13155d87
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108451
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2731d1b9a52a7c97af9bbb6ea76603630cc11c2
commit r12-9151-gf2731d1b9a52a7c97af9bbb6ea76603630cc11c2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108237
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c8e17a6a578b9eb15cd210651b6ea273022db39
commit r12-9136-g4c8e17a6a578b9eb15cd210651b6ea273022db39
Author: Jakub Jelinek
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo