[Bug target/55522] -funsafe-math-optimizations is unexpectedly harmful, especially w/ -shared

2023-01-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522 --- Comment #38 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:159b0f41adc4c8ead45e12a523470381ce716ff2 commit r13-5235-g159b0f41adc4c8ead45e12a523470381ce716ff2 Author: liuhongt Date: Fri Jan

[Bug fortran/102595] ICE in var_element, at fortran/decl.c:298 since r10-5607-gde89b5748d68b76b

2023-01-17 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102595 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug target/108415] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181

2023-01-17 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415 --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2) > The contradictory thing is that we can have TARGET_VSX and TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT > (!TARGET_HARD_FLOAT) together with the proposed option combination. :) I'm not sure w

[Bug target/108415] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181

2023-01-17 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415 --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #3) > (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2) > > The contradictory thing is that we can have TARGET_VSX and TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT > > (!TARGET_HARD_FLOAT) together with the p

<    1   2