https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108289
Bug ID: 108289
Summary: FAIL: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/functions_std_c++23.cc
(test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108279
--- Comment #4 from Michael_S ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> From what I can see, they are certainly not portable.
> E.g. the relying on __int128 rules out various arches (basically all 32-bit
> arches,
> ia32, powerpc 32-bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108290
Bug ID: 108290
Summary: QoI: bind_front captureless lambda is too big
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108290
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-01-04
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108265
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e36e57b032b2d70eaa1294d5921e4fd8ce12a74d
commit r13-5002-ge36e57b032b2d70eaa1294d5921e4fd8ce12a74d
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108235
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1ad748754401613b5cf8e5d46b38ad1ee49d07a
commit r13-5003-gb1ad748754401613b5cf8e5d46b38ad1ee49d07a
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108228
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1ad748754401613b5cf8e5d46b38ad1ee49d07a
commit r13-5003-gb1ad748754401613b5cf8e5d46b38ad1ee49d07a
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108211
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56be1970765b6302de19977790a537d6feaaa34b
commit r13-5004-g56be1970765b6302de19977790a537d6feaaa34b
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108265
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108228
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108211
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108235
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Does that fix it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108235
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-01-04 7:54 p.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108235
>
> --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Does that fix it?
I just started a ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108291
Bug ID: 108291
Summary: chunk_by_view::find-next/find-prev uses wrong lambda
helper
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106736
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92ee4e1f2792355744bf8740dccf39441b437bcf
commit r12-9029-g92ee4e1f2792355744bf8740dccf39441b437bcf
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106736
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5c37786ac61ca41c5a227362568cfa3be7866d9
commit r11-10452-ga5c37786ac61ca41c5a227362568cfa3be7866d9
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106736
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32a5510d5f419db88a0e14f3c6e4f708c0bc776d
commit r10-11149-g32a5510d5f419db88a0e14f3c6e4f708c0bc776d
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106736
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108292
Bug ID: 108292
Summary: [13 Regression] wrong code with vector compare & mask
at -O1 and above
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108272
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin ---
Created attachment 54192
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54192&action=edit
untested patch
Hi @Arseny, I hope this patch can help to clear all the ICEs about unexpected
uses of MMA opaque ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
Looking at a current discussion of
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2563.html
it seems that there is agreement that the returned type from
get_return_object() does not need to match the coroutine (ramp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108293
Bug ID: 108293
Summary: Incorrect assembly emitted for float for BPF target
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo