https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108231
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108231
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|malloc attribute vs extern |malloc and cleanup
|"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108213
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> It is a bug in the timezone sources.
Btw. fixed in
https://github.com/eggert/tz/commit/9cfe9507fcc22cd4a0c4da486ea1c7f0de6b075f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106680
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:acc727cf02a1446dc00f8772f3f479fa3a508f8e
commit r13-4894-gacc727cf02a1446dc00f8772f3f479fa3a508f8e
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue Dec 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108232
Bug ID: 108232
Summary: Bus & Segmentation error on lz4_decompress.c while
make linux-raspi
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108232
--- Comment #1 from Filip Roland ---
Created attachment 54157
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54157&action=edit
lz4_decompress.i.gz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108232
Filip Roland changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||Raspberry Pi4
Build|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108233
Bug ID: 108233
Summary: [Coarray] bcast to non-allocatable COMPLEX scalar
coarray may generate wrong result
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100343
Ahmad Samir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.samirh78 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101795
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sayle at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108208
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-27
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108229
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-27
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108232
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108218
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] Constant |[12/13 Regression] Constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101912
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108219
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106339
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108234
Bug ID: 108234
Summary: GCC accepts invalid program involving nontype template
parameter of auto with non constexpr variable
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105483
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105221
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108008
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108008
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96425
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105746
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105823
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106786
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] SRA |[12/13 Regression] SRA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108235
Bug ID: 108235
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/compat/abi/bitfield1
cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o link
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91470
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108158
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108137
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107993
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100383
jon_y <10walls at gmail dot com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||10walls at gmail dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86318
--- Comment #4 from Josh Haberman ---
Is there any plan or timeline for fixing this bug?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106736
--- Comment #14 from Arseny Solokha ---
W/ gcc 13.0.0 20221225 snapshot (g:febb58d28bfa4b544ec7ffec2d61f46d25205ff0) I
still get this ICE when compiling
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/mma-builtin-3.c:
% powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu-gcc-13 -c
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108236
Bug ID: 108236
Summary: std::exclusive_scan with execution policy does not
work in-place
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107115
Gabriel Ravier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gabravier at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107115
--- Comment #14 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Actually I think there's some aliasing violations in the C++ code w.r.t. the
re-usage of `p4` after another object has been created in its place so I think
this code would be more correct:
void test1(long
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108150
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||10walls at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r13-4906-20221227204950-g7c755fd9018-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20221227 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108238
Bug ID: 108238
Summary: returns_nonnull attribute with auto return type fails
to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95632
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e886eef7f2b5aadb00171af868f0895b647c3a4
commit r13-4907-g2e886eef7f2b5aadb00171af868f0895b647c3a4
Author: Raphael Moreira Zinsly
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106602
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e886eef7f2b5aadb00171af868f0895b647c3a4
commit r13-4907-g2e886eef7f2b5aadb00171af868f0895b647c3a4
Author: Raphael Moreira Zinsly
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95632
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106602
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108239
Bug ID: 108239
Summary: -mprefixed causes too large displacements for extended
inline asm memory operands
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104577
--- Comment #3 from Frank Heckenbach ---
(In reply to mail from comment #2)
> I looked a bit further into this and into what the standard says. GCC does
> partially the correct thing in this case, whereas several other compilers do
> the wrong
48 matches
Mail list logo