https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221
Bug ID: 108221
Summary: Building cross compiler for H8 family fails at
libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108222
Bug ID: 108222
Summary: windows 9x support for libstdc++ threads and probably
other character types
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108222
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
I think we also need flags like --with-default-win32-windows=0x0400 to tell GCC
we are building for windows 95
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108223
Bug ID: 108223
Summary: GCC reject QNaN in constant expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108223
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
__builtin_fmax does not have to be a constant expression as it is an extension
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108223
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
That being said this works:
#include
constexpr bool test() {
auto val = std::max(__builtin_nan(""), __builtin_nan(""));
return true;
}
static_assert(test());
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108222
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108223
--- Comment #3 from Nikolas Klauser ---
It doesn't have to work, but it works for some inputs, so I would expect that
it works for all. https://godbolt.org/z/KsrjEP77c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108222
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108222
--- Comment #4 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> windows 9x support is not going to happen.
You should not break windows 9x either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108224
Bug ID: 108224
Summary: Suggest stdlib.h header for rand
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108224
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108224
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108224
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/known-headers.cc b/gcc/c-family/known-headers.cc
index 9c256173b82..dd4c23e5923 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/known-headers.cc
+++ b/gcc/c-family/known-headers.cc
@@ -171,6 +171,8 @@ ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108224
--- Comment #3 from Jonny Grant ---
Great! I just saw it is the same for random(), srandom(), initstate(),
setstate()
Is there an easy way to add them all based on the C API to save opening
separate tickets?
I added those :
>From 6ff344979af4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108225
Bug ID: 108225
Summary: cross build gdb error for libstdc++'s std_mutex.h on
x86_64-w64-mingw32 host
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108226
Bug ID: 108226
Summary: __restrict on inlined function parameters does not
function as expected
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36821
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e54375d85d4aa5889869c2672158083b2106b623
commit r13-4891-ge54375d85d4aa5889869c2672158083b2106b623
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Dec 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522
--- Comment #31 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e54375d85d4aa5889869c2672158083b2106b623
commit r13-4891-ge54375d85d4aa5889869c2672158083b2106b623
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36821
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36821
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108169
mail at jhellings dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mail at jhellings dot nl
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108169
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108169
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104577
mail at jhellings dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mail at jhellings dot nl
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108169
--- Comment #6 from mail at jhellings dot nl ---
Dear Andrew,
My excuses for ruining your Christmas ??!
Thanks for confirming the bug so quickly, I hope my analysis helps solving this
and other cases.
With kind regards,
Jelle Hellings
-Or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108169
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to mail from comment #6)
> Dear Andrew,
>
> My excuses for ruining your Christmas ??!
You didn't ruin anything really. I have fun reading bugzilla reports really.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93042
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45833
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3)
> Same thing without a union:
>
> struct v { int v[4]; } __attribute__ ((aligned (4 * sizeof (int;
> void
> f (struct v *x, struct v *y, struct v *z)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108224
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #4 from S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101789
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
31 matches
Mail list logo
