[Bug rust/108113] Rust and --enable-link-serialization=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108113 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marc Poulhi?s : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02c031088ac0bbf716aec52e027d615b7a5a572b commit r13-4804-g02c031088ac0bbf716aec52e027d615b7a5a572b Author: Marc Poulhiès Date: W

[Bug modula2/108183] wrong code generated in the modula2 scaffold mechanism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108183 --- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley --- For reference the source code is: /libgm2/libm2pim/termios.cc:1981

[Bug rust/108113] Rust and --enable-link-serialization=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108113 Marc Poulhiès changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug modula2/108183] wrong code generated in the modula2 scaffold mechanism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108183 --- Comment #3 from Gaius Mulley --- The scaffold array (referencing each module ctor) is generated gcc/m2/gm2-compiler/M2Quads.mod:2402 and ctors are created in: gcc/m2/gm2-gcc/m2decl.cc

[Bug middle-end/108073] [rs6000] sub-optimal float member accessing on struct parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108073 Surya Kumari Jangala changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/107209] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw, but doesn't)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107209 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Looking at other backends, rs6000 uses in *gimple_fold_builtin gsi_replace > (..., true); > all the time, ix86 gsi_replace (..., false); all the tim

[Bug target/107209] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw, but doesn't)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107209 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #5) > aarch64_could_trap_p returns true for it as it can raise an FP exception. > Should that affect the nothrow attribute though? Shouldn't that be for C++ > exceptions on

[Bug modula2/108183] wrong code generated in the modula2 scaffold mechanism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108183 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Gaius Mulley from comment #3) > The scaffold array (referencing each module ctor) is generated > gcc/m2/gm2-compiler/M2Quads.mod:2402 and ctors are created in: > gcc/m2/gm2-gcc/m2decl.cc terms w

[Bug modula2/108183] wrong code generated in the modula2 scaffold mechanism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108183 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- so I guess gm2-libs/termios.def causes the declaration of _M2_termios_ctor to be created, but I still cannot figure out what the sequence is that causes it to be created as non-external (there is no external f

[Bug target/95751] [aarch64] Consider using ldapr for __atomic_load_n(acquire) on ARMv8.3-RCPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95751 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/97048] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overread warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97048 Bug 97048 depends on bug 108154, which changed state. Bug 108154 Summary: Inappropriate -Wstringop-overread in the C99 [static n] func param decl https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108154 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/108154] Inappropriate -Wstringop-overread in the C99 [static n] func param decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108154 Roman Žilka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/102218] 128-bit atomic compare and exchange does not honor memory model on AArch64 and Arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102218 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/108186] New: Bootstrap comparison failure.gcc-12.2.0 differs gcc/plugin.o gcc/gcc.o

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108186 Bug ID: 108186 Summary: Bootstrap comparison failure.gcc-12.2.0 differs gcc/plugin.o gcc/gcc.o Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/108180] [OpenMP] Passing a class member variable to firstprivate() erroneously calls its dtor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108180 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug modula2/108119] m2rte Seems like it should not be there at all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108119 --- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley --- Created attachment 54131 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54131&action=edit Disable m2plugin by default and add --enable-m2plugin configure

[Bug modula2/108119] m2rte Seems like it should not be there at all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108119 --- Comment #3 from Gaius Mulley --- Here is a work in progress patch which will by default disable the m2 plugin. The plugin can be enabled via --enable-m2plugin if required. The patch also checks HAVE_PLUGIN and short circuits some of the te

[Bug modula2/108183] wrong code generated in the modula2 scaffold mechanism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108183 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- OK so it seems that the reason for the marking of these object to be static is because that's what was requested, so the reason lies within the M2 symbol table and handling of imports ... * frame #0: 0x00

[Bug modula2/108183] wrong code generated in the modula2 scaffold mechanism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108183 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe --- note that these symbols seem to appear right at the end of the list - after the HelloWorld ones (which _are_ correctly non-external). Not sure if that's relevant information.

[Bug libstdc++/108178] Filesystem::copy_file can't copy from /proc on Linux machines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108178 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- In hindsight the files in /proc should probably have been named pipes, not regular files.

[Bug middle-end/108181] [missed optimization] Call to virtual function under runtime index should be optimized into jump with an offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108181 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- There's a related one with puts (".."); in the switch arms where we could sink the puts call and have the switch compute the address of the string. tree-ssa-sink.cc has code to sink common stores, that cou

[Bug modula2/108183] wrong code generated in the modula2 scaffold mechanism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108183 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Btw, the way to see what's creating some tree is breaking on the 'return result;' line in ggc_internal_alloc conditional on result being the tree (or other GC allocated) object.

[Bug bootstrap/108186] Bootstrap comparison failure.gcc-12.2.0 differs gcc/plugin.o gcc/gcc.o

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108186 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu --- Comment #1 from R

[Bug ipa/62051] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Undefined reference to vtable with -O2 and -fdevirtualize-speculatively

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||13.0 Target Milestone|11.4

[Bug c/65673] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Compound literal with initializer for zero-sized array drops other initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65673 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-04-17 00:00:00 |2022-12-20 CC|

[Bug ipa/80899] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Devirtualization causes incorrect code generation with placement new in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80899 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Known to work|

[Bug c/108043] [13 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2618 on invalid function braced initializer since r13-2205-g14cfa01755a66afb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108043 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed. PR107682 is not though.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84345] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84345 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de --- Comment #17 fr

[Bug c++/98662] [10/11/12/13 Regression] checking ICE in friend_accessible_p since r227023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98662 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/103724] [10/11/12/13 Regression] invalid warning: iteration 7 invokes undefined behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103724 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug bootstrap/108186] Bootstrap comparison failure.gcc-12.2.0 differs gcc/plugin.o gcc/gcc.o

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108186 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Does this comparison failure happen if you set LANG environment variable to C before doing a bootstrap? If it please let us know which your environment variables so we can figure out which sort is the issue.

[Bug d/104749] [12/13 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link with GDC 9.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05b7cf52e1b640271900894a894da2d27ef90092 commit r13-4805-g05b7cf52e1b640271900894a894da2d27ef90092 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug d/104749] [12/13 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link with GDC 9.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1bdb13071f0ead3c83390ac9fcc0be73a2607a42 commit r12-9001-g1bdb13071f0ead3c83390ac9fcc0be73a2607a42 Author: Richard Biene

[Bug d/104749] [12/13 regression] stage1 d21 fails to link with GDC 9.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/105221] [10/11/12/13 Regression] gcc rejects true ? [](auto) noexcept {} : [](int) {} in C++17+ (works for C++14)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105221 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/105483] [10/11/12/13 Regression] injected-class-name and constructors diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105483 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/105300] [10/11/12/13 Regression] segfault from static_assert with user-defined string suffix argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105300 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/105511] [12/13 Regression] Spurious warning: "expected 'template' keyword..." when lt and gt compare over ternary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105511 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/105532] [11/12/13 Regression] UBSAN: gcc/hwint.h:293:61: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105532 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/105653] [10/11/12/13 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105653 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug libstdc++/105730] [12/13 Regression] Issue with commit - Allow std::condition_variable waits to be cancelled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105730 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/105832] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105832 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #4 from Ri

[Bug rust/106072] [13 Regression] -Wnonnull warning breaks rust bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106072 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/106120] [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rust/106072] [13 Regression] -Wnonnull warning breaks rust bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106072 --- Comment #18 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #17) > Fixed(?) Yes on aarch64, thanks!

[Bug testsuite/106149] [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C had bogus errors after r13-1366-g1eef21ccfa5988

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106149 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 106149, which changed state. Bug 106149 Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C had bogus errors after r13-1366-g1eef21ccfa5988 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106149 What|Remo

[Bug rust/106072] [13 Regression] -Wnonnull warning breaks rust bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106072 --- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #18 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #17) >> Fixed(?) > > Yes on aarch64, thanks! Same on sparc.

[Bug target/106012] rsqrtps and rcpps instructions generated even if -fno-reciprocal-math specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106012 --- Comment #6 from vincenzo Innocente --- just to confirm that -Ofast  -fno-reciprocal-math -mno-recip seems to inhibit all reciprocals... https://godbolt.org/z/f4bccb9GP

[Bug modula2/108121] Failing tests on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108121 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/108139] [13 Regression] wrong code with "-O1 -ftree-vrp" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-1938-g87dd4c8c83768aaf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108139 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0bdd2261c254f08b0f4437c156b79711d68c6e7f commit r13-4806-g0bdd2261c254f08b0f4437c156b79711d68c6e7f Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/108139] [13 Regression] wrong code with "-O1 -ftree-vrp" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-1938-g87dd4c8c83768aaf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108139 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/108187] New: False positive -Wfree-nonheap-object on impossible path with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108187 Bug ID: 108187 Summary: False positive -Wfree-nonheap-object on impossible path with -O1 Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/106249] [13 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:645 since r13-1450-gd2a898666609452e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106249 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/107300] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: virtual definition of statement not up to date)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107300 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2022-12-19 00:00:00 |2022-12-20 --- Comment #7 from Richard

[Bug ipa/106061] [13 Regression] during GIMPLE pass: einline ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (edge points to wrong declaration) with -Og since r13-1204-gd68d366425369649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106061 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2022-12-19 00:00:00 |2022-12-20 --- Comment #7 from Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/106511] [13 Regression] New -Werror=maybe-uninitialized since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106511 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||85316 --- Comment #3 from Richard Bien

[Bug libstdc++/108188] New: Segfault in compatibility-condvar.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108188 Bug ID: 108188 Summary: Segfault in compatibility-condvar.cc Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug middle-end/106805] [13 Regression] Undue optimisation of floating-point comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106805 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Note phiopt turns some control-flow into straight-line code which is then also susceptible to code motion across the foo() calls, even if that's not what currently happens. So even preserving those stmts w

[Bug tree-optimization/106842] [12/13 Regression] misleading warning : iteration X invokes undefined behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106842 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug modula2/108153] Profiled lto bootstrap failure with modula2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108153 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/107549] [13 Regression] heap-buffer-overflow in xt_true_regnum since r13-3376-g4f3f0296acbb99

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107549 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/107575] [12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'error_mark' in duplicate_decls, at cp/decl.cc:2605 since r12-8115-g791a968630b3846b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107575 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug modula2/108153] Profiled lto bootstrap failure with modula2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108153 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- libcpp/cpplib.h has line-map.h:typedef unsigned int location_t; The modula 2 source has: FROM m2linemap IMPORT location_t ; ... PROCEDURE OverrideLocation (location: location_t) : location_t ; BEGIN IF Fo

[Bug libgcc/107675] [13 Regression] GCC-13 is significantly slower to startup on C++ statically linked programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107675 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug modula2/108153] Profiled lto bootstrap failure with modula2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108153 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 54133 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54133&action=edit gcc13-pr108153.patch Same in patch form. Let me test if that helps.

[Bug target/107678] [13 Regression] Segfault in aarch64_fallback_frame_state when running SVE code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107678 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug libstdc++/108188] Segfault in compatibility-condvar.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108188 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/105730] [12/13 Regression] Issue with commit - Allow std::condition_variable waits to be cancelled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105730 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glex.spb at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/107751] [11/12/13 regression] False positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107751 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/104278] ICE with class non-type template parameter with a value depdenent constexpr call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104278 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49b6b7ac3314843466395c4a194aa178c80e64f5 commit r13-4807-g49b6b7ac3314843466395c4a194aa178c80e64f5 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/103346] ICE on template specialization via alias template with a non-type parameter pack, and fold expression on lambda calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103346 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49b6b7ac3314843466395c4a194aa178c80e64f5 commit r13-4807-g49b6b7ac3314843466395c4a194aa178c80e64f5 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/102553] ICE (seg fault) in strip_array_types with NTTP and template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102553 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49b6b7ac3314843466395c4a194aa178c80e64f5 commit r13-4807-g49b6b7ac3314843466395c4a194aa178c80e64f5 Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug c++/102553] ICE (seg fault) in strip_array_types with NTTP and template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102553 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104278] ICE with class non-type template parameter with a value depdenent constexpr call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104278 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/103346] ICE on template specialization via alias template with a non-type parameter pack, and fold expression on lambda calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103346 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.0 CC|

[Bug modula2/108153] Profiled lto bootstrap failure with modula2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108153 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > So, I bet there must be some mismatch on whether M2Options_OverrideLocation > returns a signed or unsigned 32-bit value. > I believe the powerpc64le-linux A

[Bug modula2/108153] Profiled lto bootstrap failure with modula2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108153 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- That patch looks good btw :-)

[Bug tree-optimization/108137] [12/13 Regression] ICE: segfault during GIMPLE pass: warn-printf since r12-523-g2254b3233b5bfa69

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108137 --- Comment #5 from ucko at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov --- > --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- > I can fix that. That would be great, thanks; I can fairly easily work around this bug in the file where I first hit it, but we have another (non-publi

[Bug c/108043] [13 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2618 on invalid function braced initializer since r13-2205-g14cfa01755a66afb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108043 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/84345] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84345 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jan-Benedict Glaw from comment #17) > Just found this issue with GCC 13 (g:2dc5d6b1e7e) building the Linux kernel > for ia64 (--target=ia64-linux, with eg. the zx1_defconfig): That is a differe

[Bug c++/108158] [11/12/13 Regression] modification of '...' is not a constant expression since r12-2304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108158 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-20 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/108141] [13 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c FAIL since r13-4727 on ia32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108141 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/108158] [11/12/13 Regression] modification of '...' is not a constant expression since r12-2304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108158 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/108158] [11/12/13 Regression] modification of '...' is not a constant expression since r12-2304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108158 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug libfortran/108056] [12/13 Regression] backward compatibility issue between 11 and 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, fixed on trunk, to be backported later?

[Bug modula2/108153] Profiled lto bootstrap failure with modula2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108153 --- Comment #10 from Gaius Mulley --- LGTM yes indeed, location_t should be CARDINAL

[Bug c/94428] Reintroduce -Wzero-length-array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94428 --- Comment #4 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- a new warning -Wstrict-flex-arrays was added to gcc13. when using -Wstrict-flex-arrays -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 together, the new warning will report any misuse of zero-length arrays as flexible ar

[Bug c++/108116] [12/13 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1074 since r12-6897-gdec8d0e5fa00ceb2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108116 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug modula2/108183] wrong code generated in the modula2 scaffold mechanism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108183 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe --- So we do set _M2_termios_ctor Symbol to extern. But then here: PreAddModGcc (Sym, BuildEndFunctionDeclaration (begin, end, KeyToCharStar (GetFullSy

[Bug target/108189] New: anonymous struct declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108189 Bug ID: 108189 Summary: anonymous struct declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration Product: gcc Version: 13.0

[Bug target/108189] anonymous struct declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108189 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- The error is correct at least for C before C23.

[Bug target/108189] anonymous struct declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108189 --- Comment #2 from James Hilliard --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > The error is correct at least for C before C23. Hmm, seeing it with -std=gnu2x passed still: /home/buildroot/opt/cross/bin/bpf-gcc -g -Werror -D__TARGET_ARCH_

[Bug fortran/95375] ICE in add_use_op, Error: mismatching comparison operand types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95375 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug target/108189] anonymous struct declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108189 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- GCC does not implement all of C2X yet.

[Bug modula2/108183] wrong code generated in the modula2 scaffold mechanism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108183 --- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe --- It looks to me that we never check if Sym is a definition/implementation - only that the containing scope is. I probably miss something subtle - but perhaps IF NOT IsDefImp(Sym) RETURN ( TRUE ) bef

[Bug target/108189] anonymous struct declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108189 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Also Clang does not implement this warning at all. It is a bug in bpf-next really.

[Bug target/108189] anonymous struct declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108189 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Also Clang does not implement this warning at all. It is a bug in bpf-next really.

[Bug target/108189] anonymous struct declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108189 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/108189] anonymous struct declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108189 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- Yes the warning is really still correct even if a closer testcase would be: ``` int f(struct {int t;} *b) { return b->t; } int f1(void *a) { return f(a); } ``` I am actually shocked clang didn't impleme

  1   2   >