[Bug c/108054] C2X auto with struct defined in statement expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108054 --- Comment #3 from Martin Uecker --- It is a major usability issue for its intended use in macros if it then sometimes breaks due to arbitrary constraints (which __auto_type does not have, so do not seem to be essential). Also with the new ta

[Bug modula2/108153] Profiled lto bootstrap failure with modula2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108153 --- Comment #3 from Gaius Mulley --- On x86_64 the build succeed using MAKEFLAGS=profiledbootstrap-lean CONFIGFLAGS=--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean however I do see many ODR violations (from the output of the bootstrap tool mc). It woul

[Bug modula2/108122] gcc/testsuite/gm2/pimcoroutines/run/pass/testtime.mod runs too long

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108122 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/107397] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_arith_plus, at fortran/arith.cc:654

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107397 Rimvydas (RJ) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug fortran/107397] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_arith_plus, at fortran/arith.cc:654

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107397 --- Comment #10 from Rimvydas (RJ) --- Created attachment 54121 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54121&action=edit testcase fix

[Bug tree-optimization/108164] New: wrong code with "-O3 -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu

fix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk --enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib --with-system-zlib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 13.0.0 20221218 (experimental) [master r13-4763-g92bc3617572] (GCC) [581] % [58

[Bug modula2/108147] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64le-linux with m2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108147 --- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Gaius Mulley from comment #11) > Yes is looks as if '%' could be propagated though into the first parameter. > Changes could be made to m2linemap.cc to bump the parameters as you say with

[Bug tree-optimization/108164] [12/13 Regression] wrong code with "-O3 -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108164 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Summary|wrong cod

[Bug c++/108165] New: -Wdangling-reference false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108165 Bug ID: 108165 Summary: -Wdangling-reference false positive Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/108164] [12/13 Regression] wrong code with "-O3 -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108164 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-18 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/108164] [12/13 Regression] wrong code with "-O3 -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108164 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.1.0 Keywords|

[Bug c++/108165] -Wdangling-reference false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108165 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- So at the warning is not flow sensitive at all and does not take into account the definition of f; only the call location of f is taken into account. In this case, the call site of f has a temporary and the

[Bug c++/108165] -Wdangling-reference false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108165 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- or is it because of the different types? GCC does not look into that either and does not look into if they are castable either ...

[Bug c++/108165] -Wdangling-reference false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108165 --- Comment #3 from Romain Geissler --- In my real life case B was std::string and used a "string literal" at call site, and I guess using the implicit conversion from const char[] to std::string is something that might happen in many call sites

[Bug ipa/108110] [13 Regression] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=znver3 since r13-4685-g4834e9360f7bf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110 Manuel Lauss changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/108166] New: [12/13 Regression] Wrong code with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108166 Bug ID: 108166 Summary: [12/13 Regression] Wrong code with -O2 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-opti

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a9741d7322357c4e777450891e43db27e067817 commit r12-8991-g7a9741d7322357c4e777450891e43db27e067817 Author: Paul Thomas Da

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc956b955d12881c9b2b970ee52b337d1ef44930 commit r11-10427-gcc956b955d12881c9b2b970ee52b337d1ef44930 Author: Paul Thomas

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f2f588377e6437ae23fb83aa2c85e03e1f41678 commit r10-11127-g6f2f588377e6437ae23fb83aa2c85e03e1f41678 Author: Paul Thomas

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.0|10.5

[Bug tree-optimization/108166] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108166 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug d/108167] New: d: internal compiler error: in binary_op, at d/expr.cc:117

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108167 Bug ID: 108167 Summary: d: internal compiler error: in binary_op, at d/expr.cc:117 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug fortran/108168] New: ICE in a simple module that almost any change eliminates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108168 Bug ID: 108168 Summary: ICE in a simple module that almost any change eliminates Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr