[Bug rtl-optimization/108117] Wrong instruction scheduling on value coming from abnormal SSA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #12) > Shouldn't there be another bug for the sched1 issue specifically? In absence > of abnormal control flow, extending lifetimes of pseudos across calls is > s

[Bug tree-optimization/108133] New: Failure to merge conditional bit clears

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108133 Bug ID: 108133 Summary: Failure to merge conditional bit clears Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-opt

[Bug rtl-optimization/108117] Wrong instruction scheduling on value coming from abnormal SSA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED --- Comment #14 from Alexande

[Bug rtl-optimization/108117] Wrong instruction scheduling on value coming from abnormal SSA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108117 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #15 from Alex

[Bug rtl-optimization/57067] Missing control flow edges for setjmp/longjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Monakov --- *** Bug 108117 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/108133] Failure to merge conditional bit clears

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108133 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug tree-optimization/108133] Failure to merge conditional bit clears

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108133 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/108133] Failure to merge conditional bit clears

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108133 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/108134] New: A description bug for Extended Asm document

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108134 Bug ID: 108134 Summary: A description bug for Extended Asm document Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/108134] x86 Operand Modifiers documentation issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108134 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-15 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug rtl-optimization/90706] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Useless code generated for stack / register operations on AVR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12abd5a7d13209f79664ea603b3f3517f71b8c4f commit r13-4727-g12abd5a7d13209f79664ea603b3f3517f71b8c4f Author: Vladimir N. Makarov

[Bug modula2/108135] New: Modula2 meets clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108135 Bug ID: 108135 Summary: Modula2 meets clang Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: modula2 Assignee:

[Bug modula2/108135] Modula2 meets clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108135 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-15 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/108132] Wrong instruction scheduling around function call with longjmp on aarch64 at O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108132 qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-15 Ever confirm

[Bug rtl-optimization/108132] Wrong instruction scheduling around function call with longjmp on aarch64 at O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108132 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|REOPENED

[Bug rtl-optimization/57067] Missing control flow edges for setjmp/longjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 108132 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/108132] Wrong instruction scheduling around function call with longjmp on aarch64 at O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108132 --- Comment #7 from Qing Zhao --- > On Dec 15, 2022, at 2:33 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org > wrote: > > > There is a patch in PR 57067 even which you could try to port to a newer > compiler version and fix up. Okay, will check that patch.

[Bug modula2/108136] New: Modula2 meets cppcheck

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108136 Bug ID: 108136 Summary: Modula2 meets cppcheck Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: modula2 Assigne

[Bug rust/108111] Rust meets clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108111 --- Comment #3 from Marc Poulhiès --- Thanks Jonathan for the suggestion. The lexer code still need some refactor because the Source type (2nd template argument to buffered_queue) is expected to have a next() method and is used with both a Inpu

[Bug c/108137] New: [12 Regression] ICE: segfault during GIMPLE pass: warn-printf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108137 Bug ID: 108137 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: segfault during GIMPLE pass: warn-printf Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/108104] ICE in unify, at cp/pt.c:24333 with template partial specialization and pointer to memeber function and nullptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108104 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38304846d18d6bb14b0fd6c627c5c6d43a814d01 commit r13-4728-g38304846d18d6bb14b0fd6c627c5c6d43a814d01 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/108104] ICE in unify, at cp/pt.c:24333 with template partial specialization and pointer to memeber function and nullptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108104 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3 --- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/105518] [rejects valid] nested lambda using an outer type alias fails with constexpr integer in that alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105518 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be124477b38a71ba8ba0b24d859ae764bb44a4eb commit r13-4729-gbe124477b38a71ba8ba0b24d859ae764bb44a4eb Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/105518] [rejects valid] nested lambda using an outer type alias fails with constexpr integer in that alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105518 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/107579] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on fold-expression on .* member access operator since r12-2862-g9707d2e5dbb92d2b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107579 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18499b9f848707aee42d810e99ac0a4c9788433c commit r13-4730-g18499b9f848707aee42d810e99ac0a4c9788433c Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/100295] Internal compiler error from generic lambda capturing parameter pack and expanding it in if constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100295 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18499b9f848707aee42d810e99ac0a4c9788433c commit r13-4730-g18499b9f848707aee42d810e99ac0a4c9788433c Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/107579] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on fold-expression on .* member access operator since r12-2862-g9707d2e5dbb92d2b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107579 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/100295] Internal compiler error from generic lambda capturing parameter pack and expanding it in if constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100295 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3 Status|NEW

[Bug c++/107188] using concept type-constraint declared in nested namespace causes incorrect compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107188 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:147e276b580b674a46bc3b9c461ae7837fd48aba commit r13-4731-g147e276b580b674a46bc3b9c461ae7837fd48aba Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug ada/68849] Bug box when using a type with static predicate as formal parameter of generic procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68849 simon at pushface dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon at pushface dot org ---

[Bug c++/106740] [11/12 Regression] ICE in instantiate_decl at gcc/cp/pt.cc:26515 since r12-8467-ge057d454db4dcf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106740 --- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka --- Backporting the second patch r13-1018-ge8ed26c2ac38ab from PR105852 seems to fix the regression on the 12 branch at least.

[Bug fortran/108131] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Incorrect bound calculation when bound intrinsic used in size expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108131 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Possibly caused by the fix for pr103505 (commit r12-5779).

[Bug tree-optimization/108137] [12/13 Regression] ICE: segfault during GIMPLE pass: warn-printf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108137 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12 Regression] ICE:|[12/13 Regression] ICE:

[Bug tree-optimization/108137] [12/13 Regression] ICE: segfault during GIMPLE pass: warn-printf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108137 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3

[Bug sanitizer/108106] [13 Regression] /usr/bin/ld: .libs/hwasan_setjmp_x86_64.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against symbol `__interceptor_sigsetjmp' can not be used when making a shared object; recompi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108106 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge --- Comment on attachment 54104 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54104 A patch I'm confirming the checking to work for the case reported; 'build-gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libsanitizer/config

[Bug c++/108116] [12/13 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1074 since r12-6897-gdec8d0e5fa00ceb2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108116 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3

[Bug tree-optimization/108137] [12/13 Regression] ICE: segfault during GIMPLE pass: warn-printf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108137 --- Comment #2 from ucko at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov --- Thanks for looking into this report promptly, and sorry for getting the component wrong; I wasn't sure what would be the best fit here. Also, please note that the reported line number is the

[Bug tree-optimization/96172] Failure to optimize direct assignment to bitfield through shifts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96172 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/96172] Failure to optimize direct assignment to bitfield through shifts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96172 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note for aarch64 GCC produces decent code already (since GCC 9): f1(unsigned int): .LFB0: .cfi_startproc ubfxx0, x0, 16, 3 ret But the gimple level is missed ...

[Bug sanitizer/108106] [13 Regression] /usr/bin/ld: .libs/hwasan_setjmp_x86_64.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against symbol `__interceptor_sigsetjmp' can not be used when making a shared object; recompi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108106 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #54104|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug modula2/107612] plugin/m2rte doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107612 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe --- I did a little more poking - some of the missing symbols are in m2/gm2-libs-boot/libgm2.a adding that to the failing link line results in some more missing symbols, these look mainly like wrappers around lib

[Bug c++/102104] parameter packs not expanded with '...' for operator conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102104 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e79d51963378b10ab90544a7d8eeb6266e9a57f6 commit r13-4734-ge79d51963378b10ab90544a7d8eeb6266e9a57f6 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/108090] pack expansion of using declarations doesn't properly handle dependent conversion function names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108090 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e79d51963378b10ab90544a7d8eeb6266e9a57f6 commit r13-4734-ge79d51963378b10ab90544a7d8eeb6266e9a57f6 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/102104] parameter packs not expanded with '...' for operator conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102104 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/108090] pack expansion of using declarations doesn't properly handle dependent conversion function names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108090 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/108138] New: g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 Bug ID: 108138 Summary: g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 --- Comment #1 from Peter Hurley --- Created attachment 54108 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54108&action=edit testcase header file

[Bug libfortran/108056] [12/13 Regression] backward compatibility issue between 11 and 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056 Haochen Jiang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/108138] [10/11 Regression] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/108138] [10/11 Regression] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- GCC 12 looks faster than GCC 8 even: Time variable usr sys wall GGC phase setup: 0.00 ( 0%) 0.01 ( 25%) 0.02 (

[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libfortran/108056] [12/13 Regression] backward compatibility issue between 11 and 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056 --- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #15) > My script shows that this commit cause testcase fail following: > (It is still running and you might get a email from gcc-regression > afterwards) > FAIL: libg

[Bug tree-optimization/108139] New: wrong code with "-O1 -ftree-vrp" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108139 Bug ID: 108139 Summary: wrong code with "-O1 -ftree-vrp" on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug libfortran/108056] [12/13 Regression] backward compatibility issue between 11 and 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18af26fc375398f0a7cd7bae5aabebd447f8c899 commit r13-4737-g18af26fc375398f0a7cd7bae5aabebd447f8c899 Author: Tobias Burnus Date:

<    1   2