[Bug c++/108047] ice: unexpected expression of kind implicit_conv_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- I am having a go at a git bisect. Trying 892e8c520be37d0a.

[Bug libfortran/108056] backward compatibility issue between 11 and 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056 Rimvydas (RJ) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/108047] ice: unexpected expression of kind implicit_conv_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- That worked fine, so trying 09c91caeb84e7c36.

[Bug sanitizer/108021] sanitizer used with qemu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108021 laurent.alfonsi at linaro dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED S

[Bug go/108057] New: libgo21 not ABI compatible gcc12 vs gcc13?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108057 Bug ID: 108057 Summary: libgo21 not ABI compatible gcc12 vs gcc13? Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug go/108057] [13 Regression] libgo21 not ABI compatible gcc12 vs gcc13?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108057 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI Priority|P3

[Bug c++/108047] ice: unexpected expression of kind implicit_conv_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug go/108057] [13 Regression] libgo21 not ABI compatible gcc12 vs gcc13?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108057 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Forcing libgo.so.21 from the GCC 12 build makes the build of golang 1.9 succeed here.

[Bug libstdc++/108027] mcf thread model causes build issues for multilibs of x86_64-w64-mingw32 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027 --- Comment #9 from LIU Hao --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #8) > if I delete them by hand, then gcc could not build anymore since build > scripts of libstdc++ would complain .la do not exist No library in MSYS2 has been installed with .

[Bug libstdc++/108027] mcf thread model causes build issues for multilibs of x86_64-w64-mingw32 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027 --- Comment #10 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to LIU Hao from comment #9) > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #8) > > if I delete them by hand, then gcc could not build anymore since build > > scripts of libstdc++ would complain .la do not exist

[Bug fortran/81615] save-temps and gfortran produces *.f90 files instead of *.i or *i90 files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615 Rimvydas (RJ) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug libstdc++/108027] mcf thread model causes build issues for multilibs of x86_64-w64-mingw32 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027 --- Comment #11 from LIU Hao --- It has nothing to do with MSYS2. MSYS2 is merely an example to show that .la files are not necessary and should not be installed.

[Bug libstdc++/108027] mcf thread model causes build issues for multilibs of x86_64-w64-mingw32 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027 --- Comment #12 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to LIU Hao from comment #11) > It has nothing to do with MSYS2. MSYS2 is merely an example to show that .la > files are not necessary and should not be installed. but your build scripts do that.

[Bug libstdc++/108027] mcf thread model causes build issues for multilibs of x86_64-w64-mingw32 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027 --- Comment #13 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #12) > (In reply to LIU Hao from comment #11) > > It has nothing to do with MSYS2. MSYS2 is merely an example to show that .la > > files are not necessary and should not be ins

[Bug tree-optimization/89317] Ineffective code from std::copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/108058] New: Missed optimization with O3 and m32 when unwinding a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108058 Bug ID: 108058 Summary: Missed optimization with O3 and m32 when unwinding a loop Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug tree-optimization/108023] Incorrect line number in ASAN's report

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108023 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- LIM store-motion combines possibly multiple store locations into a single one, and I agree it's possibly confusing to assign the location to the real store in this way.

[Bug tree-optimization/108041] ivopts results in extra instruction in simple loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108041 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug tree-optimization/108041] ivopts results in extra instruction in simple loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108041 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/108042] [10/11/12/13 Regression] weakref on an extern decl is incorrectly ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108042 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-11 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/108043] [13 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2618 on invalid function braced initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108043 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/108042] [10/11/12/13 Regression] weakref on an extern decl is incorrectly ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108042 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug libfortran/108056] [12/13 Regression] backward compatibility issue between 11 and 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3 Summary|backward compa

[Bug target/108058] Missed optimization with O3 and m32 when unwinding a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108058 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target

[Bug c++/108059] New: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16425

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108059 Bug ID: 108059 Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16425 Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/108059] internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16425

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108059 LIU Hao changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.0, 11.1.0 Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/106904] [12/13 Regression] Incorrect -Wstringop-overflow with partial memcpy() into a nested structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106904 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8d136e50e6f82cba793483d910a2b2643108508 commit r13-4598-gf8d136e50e6f82cba793483d910a2b2643108508 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/106904] [12 Regression] Incorrect -Wstringop-overflow with partial memcpy() into a nested structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106904 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression] Incorrect

[Bug tree-optimization/107617] SCC-VN with len_store and big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107617 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Richard Bi

[Bug tree-optimization/89317] Ineffective code from std::copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d13b86f932ff7b9d8f41483fd869c637b67d4dec commit r13-4600-gd13b86f932ff7b9d8f41483fd869c637b67d4dec Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/89317] Ineffective code from std::copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/108051] Missing array-bounds warning when not using -ftracer flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108051 Leandro Nini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drfiemost at email dot it --- Comment #1

[Bug sanitizer/108060] New: UBsan missed an out-of-bound bug at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108060 Bug ID: 108060 Summary: UBsan missed an out-of-bound bug at -O0 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitize

[Bug debug/108061] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -m32 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108061 Bug ID: 108061 Summary: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -m32 -O2 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compare-debug-failure Severity: normal

[Bug debug/108061] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -m32 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108061 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- Created attachment 54066 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54066&action=edit gkd diff #2 The following change yields the attached fiff instead: @ -16,7 +16,7 @@ quux (int x) int bar (

[Bug c++/108058] Missed optimization with O3 and m32 when unwinding a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108058 pionere at freemail dot hu changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |c++ --- Comment #2 from pio

[Bug libstdc++/108062] New: Test spdlog c++20 std::format

/// I use gcc 13.0.0 20221211, spdlog 1.11.0 20221211 In file included from c:\gcc1300\x86_64-w64-mingw32\include\spdlog\fmt\fmt.h:14, from c:\gcc1300\x86_64-w64-mingw32\include\spdlog\common.h:50, from c

[Bug c++/108063] New: push_back on std::vector allocates wrong amount of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063 Bug ID: 108063 Summary: push_back on std::vector allocates wrong amount of memory Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/108063] push_back on std::vector allocates wrong amount of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063 jo.rickert at protonmail dot ch changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.3.1, 12.2.0, 4.8.5

[Bug c++/108063] push_back on std::vector allocates wrong amount of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063 --- Comment #2 from jo.rickert at protonmail dot ch --- The forgotten command line: g++ -o main main.cpp dummy.cpp undefined_behavior.cpp

[Bug c++/108063] push_back on std::vector allocates wrong amount of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/106904] [12 Regression] Incorrect -Wstringop-overflow with partial memcpy() into a nested structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106904 --- Comment #8 from Zebediah Figura --- Thanks!

[Bug d/108050] d: internal compiler error: in visit, at d/imports.cc:72

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9d8c9674ad3ad3aa38419d24b1aaaffe31f5d3f commit r13-4604-gd9d8c9674ad3ad3aa38419d24b1aaaffe31f5d3f Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Sat D

[Bug d/108050] d: internal compiler error: in visit, at d/imports.cc:72

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f12c8f93111e2fb0bd73d1bad52325001990 commit r12-8969-gf12c8f93111e2fb0bd73d1bad52325001990 Author: Iain Buclaw Date

[Bug d/108050] d: internal compiler error: in visit, at d/imports.cc:72

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40b5a2354b58955aef168104c173311f062f1fa5 commit r11-10415-g40b5a2354b58955aef168104c173311f062f1fa5 Author: Iain Buclaw Dat

[Bug d/108050] d: internal compiler error: in visit, at d/imports.cc:72

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d18a4b98d9b6bff4ba8b215f1e66e51ffba9638 commit r10-6-g9d18a4b98d9b6bff4ba8b215f1e66e51ffba9638 Author: Iain Buclaw Dat

[Bug c++/108063] push_back on std::vector allocates wrong amount of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- You can read up more on the one definition rule here: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/definition It is a good summary of what the standard says.

[Bug d/108050] d: internal compiler error: in visit, at d/imports.cc:72

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/108062] Test spdlog c++20 std::format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108062 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I tried to test this but my cmake is not new enough: Target "example" requires the language dialect "CXX20" , but CMake does not

[Bug libfortran/108056] [12/13 Regression] backward compatibility issue between 11 and 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Gilles Gouaillardet from comment #2) > ubuntu does not ship libgfortran.so from gfortran-11. > > I tried on a RedHat box, and the issue only occurs when > - I compile with gfortran-1

[Bug fortran/107995] ICE: Segmentation fault, without backtrace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107995 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f72249ff4cbd0a5c701b99ee8aa1ca9d82df046 commit r13-4605-g8f72249ff4cbd0a5c701b99ee8aa1ca9d82df046 Author: Steve Kargl Date: Sat

[Bug tree-optimization/108064] New: [13 Regression] apache-arrow-cpp-9.0.0 is vectored incorrectly: arithmetic shift instead of logical

3.0.0/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/13.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 13.0.0 20221211 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug tree-optimization/108064] [13 Regression] apache-arrow-cpp-9.0.0 is vectored incorrectly: arithmetic shift instead of logical

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108064 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/108064] [13 Regression] apache-arrow-cpp-9.0.0 is vectored incorrectly: arithmetic shift instead of logical

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108064 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/89317] Ineffective code from std::copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317 --- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > Should be fixed in GCC 13. If I compile the original testcase with -O3, I get for test2: _1 = this_6(D) + 16; _2 = &this_6(D)->data1; if (_1 != _2) so w

[Bug c++/108063] push_back on std::vector allocates wrong amount of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063 Eric Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric41293 at comcast dot net --- Comment

[Bug c++/108063] push_back on std::vector allocates wrong amount of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063 --- Comment #6 from jo.rickert at protonmail dot ch --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > You can read up more on the one definition rule here: > https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/definition > > It is a good summary of what

[Bug c++/108063] push_back on std::vector allocates wrong amount of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063 jo.rickert at protonmail dot ch changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID

[Bug c++/108063] push_back on std::vector allocates wrong amount of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Eric Schmidt from comment #5) > Surely this should have been resolved as INVALID? It was marked as won't fix as I am saying we won't fix (change) the compiler to reject it (even though the code

[Bug libfortran/108056] [12/13 Regression] backward compatibility issue between 11 and 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056 --- Comment #7 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've swapped out just about all the details on this work after more than a year, but we shouldn't be trying to create a CFI descriptor with BT_ASSUMED at all, should we? If the compiler is g

[Bug libfortran/108056] [12/13 Regression] backward compatibility issue between 11 and 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug fortran/102180] Improve checking of assume size array spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102180 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|

[Bug c++/108059] internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16425

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108059 --- Comment #2 from LIU Hao --- Reconfirmed with all the following versions: * g++-10 (Ubuntu 10.4.0-4ubuntu1~22.04) 10.4.0 * g++-11 (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.3.0 * g++-12 (Ubuntu 12.2.0-3ubuntu1~22.04) 12.2.0

[Bug analyzer/108065] New: [13 Regression] ICE in make, at analyzer/store.cc:132

: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: asolokha at gmx dot com Target Milestone: --- gcc 13.0.0 20221211 snapshot (g:8f72249ff4cbd0a5c701b99ee8aa1ca9d82df046) ICEs when compiling gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg

[Bug c++/108066] New: ICE in use_pack_expansion_extra_args_p, at cp/pt.cc:12661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108066 Bug ID: 108066 Summary: ICE in use_pack_expansion_extra_args_p, at cp/pt.cc:12661 Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/108066] ICE in use_pack_expansion_extra_args_p, at cp/pt.cc:12661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108066 danakj at orodu dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Version|12.2.0 |13.0 --- Comment #1 from danak

[Bug c++/108067] New: Miscompilation with friend function with parameter pack: mismatched argument pack lengths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108067 Bug ID: 108067 Summary: Miscompilation with friend function with parameter pack: mismatched argument pack lengths Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/108067] Miscompilation with friend function with parameter pack: mismatched argument pack lengths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108067 --- Comment #1 from danakj at orodu dot net --- Notably, this occurs with friend operator== or operator<=>.

[Bug tree-optimization/89317] Ineffective code from std::copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Sun, 11 Dec 2022, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317 > > --- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/108008] [12 Regression] wrong code with -O3 and posix_memalign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108008 --- Comment #10 from Alexander Monakov --- Looks similar to PR 107323, but needs explicit -ftree-loop-distribution to trigger.

[Bug tree-optimization/89317] Ineffective code from std::copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2dc5d6b1e7ec8822f5bd78761962ca2c85d4a2b4 commit r13-4607-g2dc5d6b1e7ec8822f5bd78761962ca2c85d4a2b4 Author: Richard Biener Date: