https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108008
--- Comment #9 from Alexander Monakov ---
I think this is tree-ldist placing memset(sameZ, 0, zPlaneCount) after the
loop, overwriting conditional 'sameZ[i] = true' assignments that happen in the
loop.
For the smaller testcase from comment #6,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108019
--- Comment #4 from zyfeier ---
Compile Information:
CC: timers/arch_alarm.c
arm-none-eabi-gcc -c -Wstrict-prototypes -nostdlib -pipe "-O3"
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
-fstack-protector-all -fsaniti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108019
--- Comment #5 from zyfeier ---
Compile Information:
CC: timers/arch_alarm.c
arm-none-eabi-gcc -c -Wstrict-prototypes -nostdlib -pipe "-O3"
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
-fstack-protector-all -fsaniti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99919
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Note the uninit pass has code to deal with this special
if (b.i)
b.j = 0;
...
if (b.j)
...
but it's confused by the b.j = 0 store appearing literally compared to the
b.j test being done via a (b &
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107967
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f187e9893916796992b60b278e743ec865f7418
commit r13-4549-g2f187e9893916796992b60b278e743ec865f7418
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107828
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107976
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
Nice work Alexander!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108007
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108015
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108020
Bug ID: 108020
Summary: Add fix-it hint for iostream operators declared
in-class without 'friend'
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107967
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107409
--- Comment #11 from Rama Malladi ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10)
> @Honza ?
Just checking if this can be fixed/ implemented. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108019
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99919
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 54047
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54047&action=edit
patch
I also have a patch - this disables optimize_bit_field_compare for
bitfield vs. constant compares which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102706
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4505270128ef70538ea345f292e3eb85a5369eaf
commit r13-4554-g4505270128ef70538ea345f292e3eb85a5369eaf
Author: Alexandre Oliva
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107699
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:892e8c520be37d0a0f14e2ae375103c5303ed549
commit r13-4555-g892e8c520be37d0a0f14e2ae375103c5303ed549
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107699
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
The change fixed the missing
_2 = &data._M_elems + _1;
if (&data._M_elems != _2)
goto ; [53.47%]
else
goto ; [46.53%]
optimization only, the diagnostic is still there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108015
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
What's really fun is that you can't even do:
#if __cpp_digit_separators
int i = 1'000;
#else
int i = 1000;
#endif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108021
Bug ID: 108021
Summary: sanitizer used with qemu
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108022
Bug ID: 108022
Summary: [11/12/13 regression] -frecord-gcc-switches doesn't
record preprocessor macros since
7caa49706316e650fb67719e1a1bf3a35054b685
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108022
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 regression] |[11/12/13 regression]
|-f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107985
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ef9991d8767932f51fa97753c16058d17b29b18
commit r13-4557-g0ef9991d8767932f51fa97753c16058d17b29b18
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107627
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dc49df4eeaec311f19638861c64e90d7ec696e5
commit r13-4558-g1dc49df4eeaec311f19638861c64e90d7ec696e5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106719
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9f9d5d30feb33c359955d7030cc6be50ef6dc0a
commit r13-4559-gd9f9d5d30feb33c359955d7030cc6be50ef6dc0a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107749
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106719
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108022
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108022
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105043
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108022
David Seifert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||soap at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107440
--- Comment #2 from Martin Krischik ---
Q: „How to have less bugs“
A: „Make bug reporting so complicated and cumbersome that no one reports bugs
any more“
—
>gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/Users/martin/.co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108023
Bug ID: 108023
Summary: Incorrect line number in ASAN's report
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107440
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Q: „How to have less bugs“
> A: „Make bug reporting so complicated and cumbersome that no one reports
> bugs any more“
Yet most other people abide by these instructions...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107920
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
--- Comment #4 from Ben Barrowes ---
It has been a while.
Is there any way to save the temporary preprocessed files in gfortran?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106585
--- Comment #10 from palmer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Waterman from comment #9)
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 7:02 PM palmer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
> wrote:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106585
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569
--- Comment #40 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The current state of #c0 testcase is that bar is actually optimized into return
1;
Folding statement: .ASSUME (_Z3bard._assume.0, x_1(D));
_Z3bard._assume.0 assume inferred range of x_1(D) (param x) = [fran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569
--- Comment #41 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As for #c1, with trunk -O3 -march=skylake it is:
vmovsd 8(%rdi), %xmm1
vmovsd (%rdi), %xmm0
vmulsd %xmm1, %xmm1, %xmm1
vfmadd132sd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
vsqrtsd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569
--- Comment #42 from Jakub Jelinek ---
On #c0 foo, this was previously optimized in dom2 which optimized
_4 = ABS_EXPR ;
_3 = _4 u> 1.79769313486231570814527423731704356798070567525844996599e+308;
_5 = ~_3;
if (_4 u> 1.797693134862315708
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98776
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sebastian Pop :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09c91caeb84e7c3609a12a53b57e5219a1dd2b15
commit r13-4561-g09c91caeb84e7c3609a12a53b57e5219a1dd2b15
Author: Sebastian Pop
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106912
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sure, the FUNCTION_TYPE can be shared, so shouldn't be overwritten in place,
but can be copied with TREE_READONLY cleared on the copy.
So, if we for whatever reason need to clear const flag on some functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108024
Bug ID: 108024
Summary: std::format_string's constructor has the wrong
constraint
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
--- Comment #6 from Ben Barrowes ---
There are many cases where people do not use a capital "F", but still have
preprocessor directives in the code. In these cases, no proprocessed file is
written out right now, AFAIK.
So perhaps as you suggest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*.i would be definitely wrong, that is for preprocessed C (*.ii is for
preprocessed C++, *.mi for preprocessed ObjC, etc.).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
--- Comment #8 from Ben Barrowes ---
Maybe *.fpp ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107991
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107985
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
--- Comment #2 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> (In reply to Jan-Benedict Glaw from comment #0)
> > I'll add the preprocessed sources.
>
> Could you please? Without it there isn't much that can be done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105838
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e1847612d7f169f82c985b0b3a5e3301d6fe999
commit r13-4563-g1e1847612d7f169f82c985b0b3a5e3301d6fe999
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105838
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d081807d8d70e3e87eae41e1560e54d503f4d465
commit r13-4564-gd081807d8d70e3e87eae41e1560e54d503f4d465
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105838
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bd0485f20f4794f9787237706a6308473a8e9415
commit r13-4565-gbd0485f20f4794f9787237706a6308473a8e9415
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
--- Comment #4 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Created attachment 54049
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54049&action=edit
Reduced testcase (cvise)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
--- Comment #3 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Created attachment 54048
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54048&action=edit
Original preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-08
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
create_new_iv is called with cand->pos being IP_END, where the last stmt of the
body is asm goto.
__asm__ __volatile__ goto("" : : : : "l2" l2);
;;succ: 13
;; basic block 13, loop depth 1
;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0, 11.1.0, 12.2.0
Known to wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108021
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-February/540024.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108021
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have not tried the trunk with these patches though. The patches I did were
for GCC 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108003
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-08
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Indeed, and it started with r10-5288-g52dc9c32311e8ea4833b8865c0d3121cad03937d
but guess it has been latent before.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108000
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eugene Rozenfeld :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7410032a772a9e77b620b091c2b551b68113a179
commit r13-4567-g7410032a772a9e77b620b091c2b551b68113a179
Author: Eugene Rozenfeld
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107758
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-08
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107759
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107760
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-08
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107761
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107768
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54050
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54050&action=edit
Reduced testcase
This reduces the testcase to the bare min to reproduce the wrong warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105397
--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel ---
> Perhaps the best option is to default the visibility of the implicit
> functions to the widest visibility of any function or object in module
> purview exposed by the TU.
What to do about `extern "C"` API
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108023
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|sanitizer |tree-optimization
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107768
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
#1 0x0106a451 in maybe_warn_zero_as_null_pointer_constant
(expr=, loc=16802880) at
/home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/tree.cc:6247
#2 0x00c5b243 in conversion_null_warnings (totype=,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107768
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-08
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108025
Bug ID: 108025
Summary: Duplicate CONTIGUOUS attribute should be diagnosed
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108025
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-08
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108025
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a9f6d5a8ee490adf9a18f93feaf86542642be7d
commit r13-4568-g3a9f6d5a8ee490adf9a18f93feaf86542642be7d
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108025
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107768
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh I was printing the backtrace of the wrong one :)
Breakpoint 5, warning_at (location=21406144, opt=860, gmsgid=0x36bec84 "zero as
null pointer constant") at
/home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/diagnost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107768
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(gdb) p debug_tree(decl)
unit-size
align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x76c24e70 fields context
full-name "struct
resuming_on_new_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107768
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
This should fix the issue (just like what was done in PR 51045):
diff --git a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
index 01a3e831ee5..96875425ba6 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/corout
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||TREE
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Reduced testcase for that issue:
> struct { int data[16]; } *x;
> int foo (int n1)
> {
> int *a = x->data;
> int *b = ((int*)x) + 4;
> return b - a;
> }
Bet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> Better one:
> struct b { int data[16]; };
>
> int foo (struct b *x)
> {
> int *a = x->data;
> int *b = ((int*)x) + 4;
> return b - a;
> }
Note we can hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107879
--- Comment #12 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> It is the foperator_mult::op{1,2}_range and can be seen even on:
> double
> foo (double x, double y)
> {
> double z = x * y;
> if (z == 0.0)
> retu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108020
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-08
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104296
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-09
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108015
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d61c0357ebc771166d5d48743f80aa339b4183dc
commit r13-4574-gd61c0357ebc771166d5d48743f80aa339b4183dc
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108015
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108024
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77914
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108026
Bug ID: 108026
Summary: Confusing pedwarn with template lambda with -std=c++11
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
--- Comment #10 from Ben Barrowes ---
The reason the stdout redirection doesn't work for me is because I want to save
these preprocessed files during a "make" session. When I make, thousands of
fotran files are preprocessed and compiled. How do I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108003
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7dc0ecafe60b224b3343667f55eaaa501f390925
commit r13-4578-g7dc0ecafe60b224b3343667f55eaaa501f390925
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108003
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027
Bug ID: 108027
Summary: mcf thread model causes build issues for
x86_64-w64-mingw32 multilibs
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 01:50:56AM +, barrowes at alum dot mit.edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
>
> --- Comment #10 from Ben Barrowes ---
> The reason the stdout redirectio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027
--- Comment #1 from LIU Hao ---
I need some information about this though:
When multilib is enabled, does GCC still link programs with `-lmsvcrt`? There
seems to be only reference to msvcrt:
gcc/config/i386/mingw32.h:187: -lmoldname -lmin
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
