https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107128
Mike Hommey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mh+gcc at glandium dot org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107742
Bug ID: 107742
Summary: class mismatch in passed procedure
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107128
--- Comment #7 from Mike Hommey ---
Forget my last comment, it came from the use of a sysroot with an older glibc.
I wonder why the sysroot path didn't appear in those messages...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107128
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Mike Hommey from comment #7)
> Forget my last comment, it came from the use of a sysroot with an older
> glibc. I wonder why the sysroot path didn't appear in those messages...
Can you file a n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107739
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, diagnostic
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107739
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
So there are two issues but I don't know how to solve the second part of the
issue.
The first issue is there is a missing g for the flags of the s command of the
sed command here:
missing_languages=`echo "$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45749
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14840
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8839|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14840
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
Compile time using the same base compiler (without the patch and with
--enable-checking=yes)
Without the patch:
apinski@xeond:~/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/objdir/gcc$ time make -j16 generic-match.o
CXXFLAGS="-O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14840
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looking at the -fdump-tree-optimized for generic-match.cc (-O2 -g) in terms of
lines, we get:
832068 before
718872 after
That is 17% less lines. That is nice improvments. Majority is debugging info
for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107692
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107692
--- Comment #5 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
> -munroll-only-small-loops does not turn on or off -funroll-loops, and it
> should not, so that it does what it says, if nothing else.
Yes, and -funroll-loops would win over -munroll-only-small-loops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by LuluCheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0024bfb228f94e60e06dc32a4983e40a9b90be5
commit r13-4136-gf0024bfb228f94e60e06dc32a4983e40a9b90be5
Author: Jinyang He
Date: Thu Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107692
--- Comment #6 from Hongyu Wang ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #4)
> (In reply to Hongyu Wang from comment #2)
> > Created attachment 53897 [details]
> > A patch
> >
> > Sorry for introducing these fails. Here is the patch.
> >
> > I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107743
Bug ID: 107743
Summary: expmed: extract_bit_field_1: maybe-uninitialized
warning
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107744
Bug ID: 107744
Summary: Error in constant evaluation of dynamic_cast
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107647
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5df8392c5848c0462558f41cdf6eab31db301cf
commit r13-4137-gc5df8392c5848c0462558f41cdf6eab31db301cf
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107647
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] GCC |[12 Regression] GCC 12.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107128
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Mike Hommey from comment #7)
> Forget my last comment, it came from the use of a sysroot with an older
> glibc. I wonder why the sysroot path didn't appear in those messages...
You need to use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107739
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
missing_languages=`echo "$missing_languages" |
sed -e ':loop' -e "s/,$language,/,/" -e 't loop'`
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
