https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107581
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Interesting, thanks. The Go frontend will never emit a call to
__atomic_fetch_add_4. I didn't realize that the middle end could convert
__atomic_add_fetch_4 into that. Your patch looks right. I'll com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107591
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #16)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> > I've screwed up the real_value_negate calls, they need to assign the result.
> >
> > Anyway, yet another opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107581
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:219f82070903625d6bd8865b5ecb5f944bcee871
commit r13-3868-g219f82070903625d6bd8865b5ecb5f944bcee871
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107581
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
Bug ID: 107600
Summary: New __is_destructible built-in
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107601
Bug ID: 107601
Summary: Change SLOW_BYTE_ACCESS into
WIDEN_MODE_ACCESS_BITFIELD target hook
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: internal-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107601
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
La
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And as with the others, __is_nothrow_destructible, which is what the concepts
depend on specifically:
/// [concept.destructible], concept destructible
template
concept destructible = is_nothrow_de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107601
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note SLOW_SHORT_ACCESS is unused and has been as far as I can tell it was never
used.
I submitted a patch to remove it:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/605574.html
Note also at one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107573
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Bainbridge ---
Thanks for logging this!
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0)
> - complain about NULL passed as the string to the first call of strtok
> reached from entry to "main" (I don't think there's a guara
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107602
Bug ID: 107602
Summary: dump-noaddr testcases fail when running the testsuite
with already built installed toolchain
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I committed r13-3870-g0cbb756fe9c8e1 to speed up the std::destructible concept,
so an intrinsic is not urgent. But it would probably be even better than the
new implementation, and would also help other pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105480
--- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #10)
> For scalar isnan see bug 66462. (The claim in bug 66462 comment 19 that
> there was ever a working version of that patch ready to go in is
> incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107603
Bug ID: 107603
Summary: checking for ld that supports -Wl,--gc-sections...
configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after
GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. for i686-w64-mingw32 target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97056
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-11-10
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107604
Bug ID: 107604
Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c
execution, -O0 fails on aarch64_be
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107603
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 53864
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53864&action=edit
config
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107595
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107597
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107601
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Related is probably STRICT_ALIGNMENT vs TARGET_SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
101 - 121 of 121 matches
Mail list logo