https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106821
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 53753
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53753&action=edit
testcase 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106821
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||106221
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353
Bug ID: 107353
Summary: [13 regression] Numerous ICEs after
13-3416-g1d561e1851c466
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106821
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Actually I think all three examples are that other PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107352
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.2.0, 9.1.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107352
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Slightly more reduced:
namespace std { struct destroying_delete_t { }; }
struct hh {
virtual ~hh();
static void operator delete(hh* ptr, std::destroying_delete_t)
noexcept;
};
class jj : vir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
Summary|ICE on invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106799
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106790
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent.lextrait at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106780
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106776
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Before PRE
[/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-12.2.0/include/c++/12.2.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1061:28]
__position ={v} {CLOBBER(eol)};
[/app/example.cpp:25:62] _4 = [/app/example.cpp:25:10]
&[/app/example.cpp:25:62]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106776
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a reduced testcase without any std::map or otherwise:
```
struct matrix_t
{
int* count;
matrix_t() :
count(new int(1)) {}
matrix_t(const matrix_t& p) :
count(p.count) { ++*count; }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106776
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Leandro Nini from comment #2)
> Oh, now I see it, it wasn't that obvious in the first test. But why is the
> compiler allowed to postpone the store after deleting the pointer? Is there
> some un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107354
Bug ID: 107354
Summary: gcc and clang give different answers for this
arithmetic expression
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107354
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107354
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Plus from https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ :
Before reporting that GCC compiles your code incorrectly, compile it with gcc
-Wall -Wextra and see whether this shows anything wrong with your code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107354
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
And even more from https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#known :
Increment/decrement operator (++/--) not working as expected - a problem with
many variations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106717
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This works on the trunk as far as I can tell.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101706
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98709
Bug 98709 depends on bug 101706, which changed state.
Bug 101706 Summary: bool0^bool1^1 -> bool0 == bool1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101706
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106113
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106111
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
isl
--build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r13-3440-20221021201743-g4cfdaeb2755-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20221021 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106717
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
Indeed, this particular case works now.
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
