https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106781
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106775
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106757
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106746
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106739
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.4|10.5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106736
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106719
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106713
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12 Regression]
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106709
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107314
Bug ID: 107314
Summary: New -Wsign-compare since r13-3360-g3b3083a598ca3f4b
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106594
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107305
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107306
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106713
--- Comment #7 from Arsen Arsenović ---
Yes, this and https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106188 both.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107307
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107298
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> Is there some documentation explaining this, or telling Sanitizer
> users to turn off warnings-as-errors?
Unfortunately, it is not, but we should include it.
Generally speaking, -Wmaybe-uninitialized is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106840
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I believe this should have been fixed with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:572f5e1bc68e131b25cd2d5ba231e932f5038904
commit r13-2508-g572f5e1bc68e131b25cd2d5ba231e932f5038904
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Wed Sep 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107308
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||101057
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107310
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107311
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107312
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107314
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|New -Wsign-compare since|[13 Regression] New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107311
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106594
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56139
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|deferred|
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107315
Bug ID: 107315
Summary: The "long double float" is only 64 bit on Apple
Silicon MacBook
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106781
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32ab9238d86dfa6d74d3592bec570f4f257d0413
commit r13-3370-g32ab9238d86dfa6d74d3592bec570f4f257d0413
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106781
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100645
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6db4ba9750ffd65c80995425db0d5f1020a04b28
commit r12-8845-g6db4ba9750ffd65c80995425db0d5f1020a04b28
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96072
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7f17493cc26a4395d549547075603a15f4c94a7
commit r12-8846-gc7f17493cc26a4395d549547075603a15f4c94a7
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100645
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96750
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 53728
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53728&action=edit
unincluded testcase
Runtimes with GCC 10 and GCC 12 are the same for me, but the benchmark
completes very qui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96750
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |9.5.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97747
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98662
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
So is this a rejects-valid as well? The assert suggests the return value and
the diagnostic without checking is wrong:
> g++-11 t.C -c
t.C: In instantiation of 'int f(S)':
t.C:16:10: required from here
t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106652
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba281da28d34f9a78a07f6ee56ad2c754447966e
commit r13-3372-gba281da28d34f9a78a07f6ee56ad2c754447966e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106990
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07cc4c1da1046f0ffda241d59df796417c122ff5
commit r13-3373-g07cc4c1da1046f0ffda241d59df796417c122ff5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107262
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65b98fc763d14d371fcf37a17e33519012ec2bac
commit r13-3374-g65b98fc763d14d371fcf37a17e33519012ec2bac
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106990
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107262
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from Richard Bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102758
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e8bd12887e5f242bc45c9df14384db052e885d80
commit r12-8847-ge8bd12887e5f242bc45c9df14384db052e885d80
Author: Andrew MacLeo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104088
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Doesn't reproduce without actually doing offloading
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105546
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105546
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 53729
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53729&action=edit
patch to limit sinking
I was playing with this, limiting sinking to two PHI nodes in this case but
then with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105591
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 105643, which changed state.
Bug 105643 Summary: [13 Regression] Code-Size regression for specrate
538.imagick_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105765
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105769
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105809
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105825
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105988
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
The rtx_insn in question is
(note 13 14 17 5 [bb 5] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
but INSN_LOCATION here is the NOTE kind!? Still it says INSN_HAS_LOCATION
and the XUINT access RTL_CHECK2 isn't flagging this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105988
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106180
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106210
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106339
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106433
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106577
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19)
> I've posted
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-July/598896.html
> patch for this, waiting for Jon's review.
N.B. that was committed as r13-261
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107297
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> I would also want comments to be editable if this gets turned on, in case I
> screw up my formatting... is there a way to allow that in bugzilla?
There's a Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105769
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Can't reproduce with huge param value with the revision before it was removed:
gcc-bisect.py 'g++ pr105769.ii -flto -O1 -ftree-vectorize --param
slp-max-insns-in-bb=1 && ./a.out' -e
16ad9ae85bb5b9acf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107297
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> And many folks don't use markdown especially when they are used to plain
> text. C++ is the worst where < gets eaten up. This has been one of issues
> with git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] bogus|[12 Regression] bogus "may
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96072
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25b6cbe8a9abd5ad9b05f23f00f9ae68aa105c99
commit r11-10322-g25b6cbe8a9abd5ad9b05f23f00f9ae68aa105c99
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107316
Bug ID: 107316
Summary: [aarch64] Init big const value should be improved
compare to llvm
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107282
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So we are late processing (rest_of_handle_final) dwaf2out_decl of copyLifeState
and there iterating the scope vars which include a TYPE_DECL ._anon_2 here
for which we generate a type DIE because
27023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106355
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb994acc08b67f26a54e7c5dc1f4995a2ce24d98
commit r13-3377-gcb994acc08b67f26a54e7c5dc1f4995a2ce24d98
Author: Stefan Sch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107206
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6c168f8c06047bfaa3005e570126831b8855dcc
commit r13-3378-gf6c168f8c06047bfaa3005e570126831b8855dcc
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92706
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6c168f8c06047bfaa3005e570126831b8855dcc
commit r13-3378-gf6c168f8c06047bfaa3005e570126831b8855dcc
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107312
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107312
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 53730
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53730&action=edit
patch in testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105765
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary|[13 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107313
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107312
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d32969898e113e86e1c42b0c6f096f8228cbf1ff
commit r13-3382-gd32969898e113e86e1c42b0c6f096f8228cbf1ff
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107312
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62133
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107261
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Another testcase, for C code:
$ cat testcase.c
__bf16 __attribute__((__vector_size__(8))) foo(void) {}
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc testcase.c
testcase.c: In function 'foo':
testcase.c:1:1: internal compiler e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62133
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #2)
> Another testcase, for C code:
> $ cat testcase.c
> __bf16 __attribute__((__vector_size__(8))) foo(void) {}
> $ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc testcase.c
> testcase.c: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106583
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106583
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107316
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-19
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107315
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107315
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|The "long double float" is |support 128bit long double
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107311
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a01eae670600852f78e8df1b88259572f181d42e
commit r13-3385-ga01eae670600852f78e8df1b88259572f181d42e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107314
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
This is a deliberate change: if any enumerators are outside the range of
int, then all enumerators now have the enum type, rather than those
outside the range of int having the enum type a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107313
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a10d6b5eb999a74fd4b12c00e8fb379cd3460e93
commit r13-3386-ga10d6b5eb999a74fd4b12c00e8fb379cd3460e93
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107311
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107313
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107317
Bug ID: 107317
Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in emit_redzone_byte, at
asan.cc:1508
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107318
Bug ID: 107318
Summary: ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.cc:1446
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107319
Bug ID: 107319
Summary: ICE in flag_instrument_functions_exclude_p, at
gimplify.cc:17710
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo