[Bug c++/107147] [13 Regression] ICE in register_local_var_uses, at cp/coroutines.cc:3923

2022-10-08 Thread arsen at aarsen dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107147 Arsen Arsenović changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arsen at aarsen dot me --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/106654] [C++23] P1774 - Portable assumptions

2022-10-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106654 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #53675|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/107147] [13 Regression] ICE in register_local_var_uses, at cp/coroutines.cc:3923

2022-10-08 Thread arsen at aarsen dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107147 --- Comment #4 from Arsen Arsenović --- Ah, my bad, I had checking off in my 12.2.0 build.

[Bug tree-optimization/107184] New: Copy warnings in dump files

2022-10-08 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107184 Bug ID: 107184 Summary: Copy warnings in dump files Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug target/107185] New: [13 Regression] during RTL pass: vregs ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (unrecognizable insn) with -ffast-math and lrintf()

2022-10-08 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
nux-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r13-3175-20221007202551-g6ffbf87ca66-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib

[Bug fortran/66409] Reporting ambiguous interface when overloading assignment with polymorphic array

2022-10-08 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66409 --- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jeff Hammond from comment #11) > > program foo > >use f > >integer i > >call test(i) > > end program > > > > which specific subroutine is called based on TKR? > > I under

[Bug c++/107186] New: GCC rejects use of static constexpr member function in noexcept complete-class context

2022-10-08 Thread jlame646 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107186 Bug ID: 107186 Summary: GCC rejects use of static constexpr member function in noexcept complete-class context Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/100040] Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable

2022-10-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100040 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07da38566232cc11901c3eeb9fc2860f02f2e31f commit r12-8813-g07da38566232cc11901c3eeb9fc2860f02f2e31f Author: José Rui Fausti

[Bug fortran/100029] ICE on subroutine call with allocatable polymorphic assumed-rank argument

2022-10-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100029 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07da38566232cc11901c3eeb9fc2860f02f2e31f commit r12-8813-g07da38566232cc11901c3eeb9fc2860f02f2e31f Author: José Rui Fausti

[Bug fortran/100029] ICE on subroutine call with allocatable polymorphic assumed-rank argument

2022-10-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100029 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1167c14d598021581e984cbe46273ade4bc54126 commit r11-10295-g1167c14d598021581e984cbe46273ade4bc54126 Author: José Rui Faust

[Bug fortran/100040] Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable

2022-10-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100040 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1167c14d598021581e984cbe46273ade4bc54126 commit r11-10295-g1167c14d598021581e984cbe46273ade4bc54126 Author: José Rui Faust

[Bug fortran/100040] Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable

2022-10-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100040 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a880f9a44ecad385d4273f96f76c5c900d716941 commit r10-11024-ga880f9a44ecad385d4273f96f76c5c900d716941 Author: José Rui Faust

[Bug fortran/100029] ICE on subroutine call with allocatable polymorphic assumed-rank argument

2022-10-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100029 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a880f9a44ecad385d4273f96f76c5c900d716941 commit r10-11024-ga880f9a44ecad385d4273f96f76c5c900d716941 Author: José Rui Faust

[Bug fortran/100029] ICE on subroutine call with allocatable polymorphic assumed-rank argument

2022-10-08 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100029 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/100040] Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable

2022-10-08 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100040 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug d/105413] gdc extended assembler cannot constraints r8 - r15

2022-10-08 Thread witold.baryluk+gcc at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105413 --- Comment #3 from Witold Baryluk --- It works. Thank you. Any chance this will be in gcc 12.x? I work a lot on Debian Linux, and I doubt I will have gcc trunk or gcc 13 available any time soon. Also weirdly gcc does not inline this function

[Bug fortran/107000] ICE in gfc_real2complex, at fortran/arith.cc:2243

2022-10-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107000 --- Comment #24 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:705ed42a1ad950860f46c51216ff69dbe0f4857a commit r13-3176-g705ed42a1ad950860f46c51216ff69dbe0f4857a Author: Harald Anlauf Date: T

[Bug fortran/87659] Memory corruption in array component of intent(in) unlimited polymorphic with optimization

2022-10-08 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87659 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/102275] Assumed rank, unlimited polymorphic pointer gives incorrect behaviour

2022-10-08 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102275 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/107187] New: [feature request] Add `trivial_abi` attribute

2022-10-08 Thread nikolasklauser at berlin dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107187 Bug ID: 107187 Summary: [feature request] Add `trivial_abi` attribute Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/107187] [feature request] Add `trivial_abi` attribute

2022-10-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107187 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/107187] [feature request] Add `trivial_abi` attribute

2022-10-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107187 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think a better way of implementing an abi specific attribute is in the shared c++ abi forum and then have it accepted there too. Then it could be the shared abi namespace like other c++ abi features are d

[Bug c++/107188] New: using concept type-constraint declared in nested namespace causes incorrect compilation error

2022-10-08 Thread Mark_B53 at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
ge && std::same_as, V>; - g++ a.cpp -std=c++20 Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20221008/configure --prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64

[Bug target/107185] [13 Regression] during RTL pass: vregs ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (unrecognizable insn) with -ffast-math and lrintf()

2022-10-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107185 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug libstdc++/107189] New: Inconsistent range insertion implementations in std::_Rb_tree in

2022-10-08 Thread frankhb1989 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107189 Bug ID: 107189 Summary: Inconsistent range insertion implementations in std::_Rb_tree in Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/107184] Copy warnings in dump files

2022-10-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107184 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This is where analyzer comes into hand really. Maybe the warning should suggest using analyzer for more details? Even if they are two different code bases for the warning and analyzer it seems like they cou

[Bug target/107185] [13 Regression] during RTL pass: vregs ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (unrecognizable insn) with -ffast-math and lrintf()

2022-10-08 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107185 --- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu --- Looks like there's mismatch between 20147(define_expand "lrint2" 20148 [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 "nonimmediate_operand") 20149 (unspec:SWI48 [(match_operand:MODEF 1 "register_operand")] 20150