[Bug c++/81159] New warning idea: -Wself-move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81159 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de --- Comment #12 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/107109] New: ICE on valid code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in type, at value-range.h:621

/software/local/gcc-trunk --enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib --with-system-zlib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 13.0.0 20221001 (experimental) [master r13-3010-g2555071c954] (GCC) [506] % [506] % gcctk -O1 small.c

[Bug debug/107110] New: failure (length) with -fcompare-debug at -O1 and above

--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib --with-system-zlib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 13.0.0 20221001 (experimental) [master r13-3010-g2555071c954] (GCC) [530] % [530] % gcctk -O1 -fcompare-debug small.c gcctk

[Bug c++/107111] New: GCC accepts invalid program involving function declaration with pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107111 Bug ID: 107111 Summary: GCC accepts invalid program involving function declaration with pack expansion Product: gcc Version: 12.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug tree-optimization/107107] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Wrong codegen from TBAA when stores to distinct same-mode types are collapsed?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug c++/107111] GCC accepts invalid program involving function declaration with pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107111 --- Comment #1 from Jason Liam --- The last statement in my original report is not valid because `V` is a template parameter pack. So ignore that line.

[Bug target/107112] New: [13 Regression] endless loop building the amdgcn-amdhsa offload compiler

: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- seen with trunk 20221001, trying to build the amdgcn-amdhsa offload compiler with the just built x86_64-linux-gnu host compiler

[Bug c++/107113] New: In function parameter list, `...` expanding a pack is accepted after `()` of a parameter declarator, but not before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107113 Bug ID: 107113 Summary: In function parameter list, `...` expanding a pack is accepted after `()` of a parameter declarator, but not before Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c++/107111] GCC accepts invalid program involving function declaration with pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107111 --- Comment #2 from Jason Liam --- Also gcc rejects `V...()` but clang accepts that. Demo: https://godbolt.org/z/bfx9rv6hP

[Bug tree-optimization/107114] New: [13 Regression] Failure to discover range results in bogus warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107114 Bug ID: 107114 Summary: [13 Regression] Failure to discover range results in bogus warning Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/107114] [13 Regression] Failure to discover range results in bogus warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107114 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug fortran/100040] Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100040 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5299155bb80e90df822e1eebc9f9a0c8e4505a46 commit r13-3014-g5299155bb80e90df822e1eebc9f9a0c8e4505a46 Author: José Rui Faustino de Sou

[Bug fortran/100029] ICE on subroutine call with allocatable polymorphic assumed-rank argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100029 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5299155bb80e90df822e1eebc9f9a0c8e4505a46 commit r13-3014-g5299155bb80e90df822e1eebc9f9a0c8e4505a46 Author: José Rui Faustino de Sou

[Bug fortran/100132] Optimization breaks pointer association

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100132 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9de83c0939dabdbefcb88dfef3ad7caf932951ec commit r12-8802-g9de83c0939dabdbefcb88dfef3ad7caf932951ec Author: José Rui Fausti

[Bug fortran/100103] Automatic reallocation fails inside select rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100103 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56275fd23e3f7876c24a812f9b6776b00a94744e commit r12-8803-g56275fd23e3f7876c24a812f9b6776b00a94744e Author: José Rui Fausti

[Bug fortran/100132] Optimization breaks pointer association

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100132 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd13cc012e0bca927f97f618ab54c8d365883bbc commit r11-10286-gcd13cc012e0bca927f97f618ab54c8d365883bbc Author: José Rui Faust

[Bug fortran/100103] Automatic reallocation fails inside select rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100103 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3 Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/100132] Optimization breaks pointer association

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100132 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c583871e70f5530907d22a21b0f1d1e7b90e224 commit r10-11015-g8c583871e70f5530907d22a21b0f1d1e7b90e224 Author: José Rui Faust

[Bug fortran/100132] Optimization breaks pointer association

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100132 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|

[Bug middle-end/107115] New: Wrong codegen from TBAA under stores that change effective type?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107115 Bug ID: 107115 Summary: Wrong codegen from TBAA under stores that change effective type? Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/107107] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Wrong codegen from TBAA when stores to distinct same-mode types are collapsed?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107 --- Comment #7 from Rich Felker --- Second one filed as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107115

[Bug c++/107113] In function parameter list, `...` expanding a pack is accepted after `()` of a parameter declarator, but not before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107113 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Is this Bug 107111?

[Bug c/107116] New: -Woverflow false alarm in unreachable code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107116 Bug ID: 107116 Summary: -Woverflow false alarm in unreachable code Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/107116] -Woverflow false alarm in unreachable code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107116 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I thought there was a much older duplicate of this bug but I can't find it right now. When I saw older I mean under 1000.

[Bug rtl-optimization/107115] Wrong codegen from TBAA under stores that change effective type?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107115 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Component|middle-end

[Bug tree-optimization/107090] [aarch64] sequence logic should be combined with mul and umulh

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107090 --- Comment #2 from vfdff --- Thanks for your suggestion. As the combine pass can't address more than 4 sequence insns, which pass may be more suitable to match the huge pattern after fixing the 1st issue.

[Bug middle-end/107115] Wrong codegen from TBAA under stores that change effective type?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107115 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|middle-end --- Comment #2 from Andrew P

[Bug c++/107117] New: "atan2" fails to set the floating-point inexact exception when it should, in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107117 Bug ID: 107117 Summary: "atan2" fails to set the floating-point inexact exception when it should, in some cases Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/107090] [aarch64] sequence logic should be combined with mul and umulh

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107090 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to vfdff from comment #2) > Thanks for your suggestion. > > As the combine pass can't address more than 4 sequence insns, which pass may > be more suitable to match the huge pattern after fixing t

[Bug c++/107117] "atan2" fails to set the floating-point inexact exception when it should, in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107117 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This might be a bug with glibc rather than GCC ...

[Bug c++/107117] "atan2" fails to set the floating-point inexact exception when it should, in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107117 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Or it might be that gcc constant folds this case ...

[Bug c++/107117] "atan2" fails to set the floating-point inexact exception when it should, in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107117 Jay Reynolds Freeman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Jay_Reynolds_Freeman at mac dot

[Bug c++/107111] GCC accepts invalid program involving function declaration with pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107111 Egor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iamsupermouse at mail dot ru --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c++/107113] In function parameter list, `...` expanding a pack is accepted after `()` of a parameter declarator, but not before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107113 Egor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/107111] GCC accepts invalid program involving function declaration with pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107111 --- Comment #4 from Egor --- *** Bug 107113 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/107118] New: "does not name a type" when used in constrained struct specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107118 Bug ID: 107118 Summary: "does not name a type" when used in constrained struct specialization Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/107119] New: Bootstrap ICE on 32-bit ARM after r13-2871-g1b74b5cb4e9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107119 Bug ID: 107119 Summary: Bootstrap ICE on 32-bit ARM after r13-2871-g1b74b5cb4e9 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug bootstrap/107119] Bootstrap ICE on 32-bit ARM after r13-2871-g1b74b5cb4e9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107119 Maxim Kuvyrkov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com,

[Bug c++/96830] GCC does not complain about redeclaration with inconsistent requires clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96830 Oliver Schönrock changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oschonrock at gmail dot com --- Comme