https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106701
Bug ID: 106701
Summary: s390: Compiler does not take into account number range
limitation to avoid subtract from immediate
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106702
Bug ID: 106702
Summary: ICE with LTO: internal compiler error: tree code
‘c_maybe_const_expr’ is not supported in LTO streams
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONF
-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20220821 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90088
dingd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ntysdd at qq dot com
--- Comment #7 from dingd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106702
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106702
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106704
Bug ID: 106704
Summary: avx intrinsic no generating vblendvps instruction with
-mavx
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106704
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106703
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-08-21
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106705
Bug ID: 106705
Summary: Expensive constant load replicated throughout switch
statement
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106706
Bug ID: 106706
Summary: Enabling LTO causes incorrect calculation in in_csum()
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106706
--- Comment #1 from Quentin Armitage ---
Created attachment 53486
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53486&action=edit
Tar file containing the generated .i files and make.log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106694
--- Comment #4 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is backend issue:
> //(insn 27 31 28 (set (reg/v:VNx2DI 37 v5 [orig:98 v0 ] [98])
> //(unspec:VNx2DI [
> //(reg:VNx2BI 68 p0 [orig:105
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106706
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106694
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #4)
> No. I am not saying the issue of "movprfx". I am saying the issue of the
> redundant "mov" instructions.:
> mov z5.d, z24.d
> mov z4.d, z25.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106694
--- Comment #6 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #4)
> > No. I am not saying the issue of "movprfx". I am saying the issue of the
> > redundant "mov" instructions.:
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106705
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the cost for constant loading usually is expensive which is why this case
is usually ignored ...
It is more costly on in-order chips though, especially RISCV where constant
forming takes 3 instructions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106705
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106687
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] Wrong code |[13 Regression] Wrong code
h-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r13-2130-20220821001633-gd6a39c25c05-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105937
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c77fae1ca796d6ea06d5cd437909905c3d3d771c
commit r13-2134-gc77fae1ca796d6ea06d5cd437909905c3d3d771c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105937
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression]
|may
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106687
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106688
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> _33 = (const unsigned char *) ivtmp.18_7;
> invariant up to level 2, cost 1.
Yep, that's an "old" thing, PRE would have moved it but LIM has something they
c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106688
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, as of coalescing I think the only coalescing we should do at out-of-SSA
time
is coalescing to avoid copies on edges (aka for PHIs and abnormals), the rest
should be left to the RA (OTOH we're going to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106689
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2022-08-19 00:0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106693
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-08-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106695
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0
Summary|Regression 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|X86_64 |x86_64-*-*
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105937
--- Comment #7 from janisozaur+gcc at gmail dot com ---
Will the fix get merged to 12.3 as well? This currently prevents the project I
work on from compiling with GCC
(https://github.com/OpenRCT2/OpenRCT2/issues/17371)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|rguenth at gcc
31 matches
Mail list logo
