https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106612
Bug ID: 106612
Summary: ranges::iter_move does not consider iterator's value
categories
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106608
--- Comment #3 from Egor Pugin ---
Small repro https://godbolt.org/z/WKc7arxMs
Probably clang issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106613
Bug ID: 106613
Summary: GCC rejects valid program involving std::invariant
saying incomplete type
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106594
--- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina ---
Hi Roger,
before you spend too much time on this, I just wanted to clarify.
If you're saying this is a target issue where we lack some symmetry on patterns
I would be happy to fix it up and don't really
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106614
Bug ID: 106614
Summary: GCC skips using copy constructor when creating object
using direct initialization in A a({A{}});
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106615
Bug ID: 106615
Summary: redundant load and store introduced in if-true-branch
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106615
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106613
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106608
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 53453
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53453&action=edit
small testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106616
Bug ID: 106616
Summary: ia64: ICE during RTL pass: mach: error: qsort
comparator non-negative on sorted output: 3
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106616
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87281
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106604
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87281
--- Comment #12 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106616#c0 provides hopefully
reproducible test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106551
Tim Lange changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tlange at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617
Bug ID: 106617
Summary: [13 Regression] gcc is very slow at ternary
expressions,
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
--- Comment #1 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I doubt this is a regression. I suspect if you compile the trunk with
> --enable-checking=release you would see the same compile time as 12.
I think both m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > I doubt this is a regression. I suspect if you compile the trunk with
> > --enable-checking=release you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Gcc releases are always defaults to --enable-checking=release while the git
trunk is =yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106613
--- Comment #2 from Jason Liam ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> clang rejects it with the same error message.
>
> Both GCC and clang are correct because the inner types are not complete
> until after the outer type is complete.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106613
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jlame646 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106613
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106322
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #45 from Kewen Lin --
25 matches
Mail list logo