https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106438
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le
Component|tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106442
--- Comment #3 from sherry.zhang2 at arm dot com ---
Created attachment 53355
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53355&action=edit
C Source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106442
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
A picture is not the source.
But this looks more like a bug in either your inline-asm or how you invoke gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106442
--- Comment #5 from sherry.zhang2 at arm dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> A picture is not the source.
> But this looks more like a bug in either your inline-asm or how you invoke
> GCC.
Logs after adding -v to GCC:
COLL
Component: modula2
Assignee: gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11
Target: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11
Build: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11
As of 20220726, 2000+ 32-bit gm2 tests FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106444
Bug ID: 106444
Summary: vrange_printer::visit ICEs
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106444
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106444
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
hmm, but r.symbolic_p returns false. Ah, because it's "wrong" in the way
of treating &MEM [(void *)&D.42061 + 16B] as not symbolic
(it's an address constant). It's still not an irange though?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106435
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |c++
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106419
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Kewen Lin ---
Than
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106444
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106445
Bug ID: 106445
Summary: nvptx offloading: C++ constructor symbol alias getting
lost
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp, wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106419
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106369
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly further reduced:
struct A {
int a[256];
constexpr int &operator[] (int n) noexcept { return a[n]; }
constexpr const int &operator[] (int n) const noexcept { return a[n]; }
};
struct B {};
te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106369
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And that testcase has been rejected before r10-5194-g7906797ebec6881d and ICEs
since that revision.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106249
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Related to PR106099
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106444
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 53356
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53356&action=edit
patch in testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106442
--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw ---
possibly a dup of pr101723. Please try gcc-11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98735
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-01-18 00:00:00 |2022-7-26
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106442
--- Comment #7 from sherry.zhang2 at arm dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #6)
> possibly a dup of pr101723. Please try gcc-11.3
The latest version I can get is 11.2
https://developer.arm.com/tools-and-software/open-source-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106304
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99769
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-03-30 00:00:00 |2022-7-26
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106442
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to sherry.zhang2 from comment #7)
> (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #6)
> > possibly a dup of pr101723. Please try gcc-11.3
>
> The latest version I can get is 11.2
> https://develo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jwakely at redhat dot com |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
My preference would be still to make the overlap case out-of-line as mentioned
in PR105329, but I don't have statistics on whether the overlap case is really
cold in real-world. If yes, it would make non-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106099
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think the vast majority of string mutations involve
inserting/appending/substituting an unrelated string, so non-overlapping. We
can make your change on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
>
> --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> My preference would be still to make the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106444
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2615502971ca11c15f1949c03d93ccfe1ce54f55
commit r13-1840-g2615502971ca11c15f1949c03d93ccfe1ce54f55
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106444
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106446
Bug ID: 106446
Summary: -Warray-bounds false positive on downcast under
condition
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Michael_S from comment #12)
> On related note...
> One of the historical good features of gcc relatively to other popular
> compilers was absence of auto-vectorization at -O2.
> When did you d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105580
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105493
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Can this be considered fixed on trunk?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105463
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105458
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.1.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106435
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 53358
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53358&action=edit
Patch under test
This works without regression on x86_64 Darwin, now doing wider testing.
The basic approach sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105452
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105438
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105430
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105427
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105412
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.5.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105267
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106311
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2333b58c9892667545d0c2c3ecd2d7b947197511
commit r13-1841-g2333b58c9892667545d0c2c3ecd2d7b947197511
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105329
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 53359
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53359&action=edit
gcc13-pr105329.patch
Untested workaround.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106345
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105427
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106316
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The declare variant directive is just on stub, it doesn't add properties to the
variant function.
I think you need #pragma omp declare target device(host) to (onhost) to make
sure onhost isn't defined for th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Note on trunk we get things way less optimized and end up with
[local count: 695302893]:
__x.38_144 = (long unsigned int) " ";
__y.39_145 = (long unsigned int) _137;
if (__x.38_144 < __y.39_145)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91299
--- Comment #11 from Alexander Monakov ---
Marxin, you've marked this as WAITING, can you please re-evaluate? The nice
testcase from comment #2 is reproducible on trunk as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105216
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104986
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104965
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104965
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104935
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 104935, which changed state.
Bug 104935 Summary: [12/13 Regression] 554.roms_r ELF binary increased with
r12-7612-g69619acd8d9b5856
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104935
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104912
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104787
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104475
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104368
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #29 from Richard Biener ---
What's the status here on the GCC 12 branch and trunk?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104200
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104165
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106447
Bug ID: 106447
Summary: nvptx offloading: C++ '__iterator_category' 'return'
ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103388
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103195
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102982
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
--- Comment #16 from Ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102879
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106311
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9be0feeadeeac2166fbe3823421bc5712bc59087
commit r12-8619-g9be0feeadeeac2166fbe3823421bc5712bc59087
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106311
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102697
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102633
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102540
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102473
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 102473, which changed state.
Bug 102473 Summary: [12/13 Regression] 521.wrf_r 5% slower at -Ofast and
generic x86_64 tuning after r12-3426-g8f323c712ea76c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102473
Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102250
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-07-26
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #7 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101461
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105135
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100460
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98662
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-01-14 00:00:00 |2022-7-26
--- Comment #6 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94212
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69410
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2022-01-29 00:00:00 |2022-7-26
--- Comment #9 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104965
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> Re-confirmed. Didn't we change libstdc++ to not expect CSE around new?
I don't think that's valid, is it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102633
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106261
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100460
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
They are needed for O_CREAT.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102633
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo