https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103074
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106419
Bug ID: 106419
Summary: ICE in lra_assign, at lra-assigns.cc:1649
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, ra
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106420
Bug ID: 106420
Summary: Missed optimization for comparisons
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106420
--- Comment #1 from zero at smallinteger dot com ---
(it should be possible to massage the output further to use test and setne,
which ICC prefers to e.g. cmp and seta)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106332
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106362
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106371
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105370
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|776 |772
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
--- Comment #22 from Eric Gallager ---
oops wait I thought this was a meta-bug for a moment... although, maybe it's
time to start using it as one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106421
Bug ID: 106421
Summary: ICE with computed goto from a nested functon
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106162
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01c25003d2a21d199df22548c2c8a8110e755dc7
commit r10-10911-g01c25003d2a21d199df22548c2c8a8110e755dc7
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105956
--- Comment #12 from tt_1 ---
may I ask kindly - this was seemingly reported with a git version of gcc-12, so
is there still a need for backporting the fix to that branch as well?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105041
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106162
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106003
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
I don't think we were tracking the RFE for this in bugzilla, so just a note
that Immad had now committed his patch for the three new attributes for
functions that make use of file descriptors:
https://gcc.gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106422
Bug ID: 106422
Summary: ice in duplicate_block, at cfghooks.cc:1115
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106422
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Version|12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106422
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Someone is not checking can_duplicate_block_p before calling duplicate_block.
Most likely exposed by r13-1753-g26cea5f108e0fa which rejects blocks which have
a return twice function at the end.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106423
Bug ID: 106423
Summary: -Wc++20-compat diagnostics not suppressed by #pragma
GCC diagnostic ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106423
--- Comment #1 from Tom Honermann ---
A patch for this issue was submitted to the gcc-patches mailing list and is
available at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-July/598736.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106422
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Reduced source code is
int semanage_exec_prog_sh_0;
void vfork() __attribute__((__leaf__));
void semanage_reload_policy() {
char argv;
if (argv)
semanage_exec_prog_sh_0 = __FUNCTION__;
vfork();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106424
Bug ID: 106424
Summary: __attribute__ unused confuses -Wshadow when placed on
internal parameter of fn ptr
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
22 matches
Mail list logo
