[Bug c++/69410] friend declarations in local classes

2022-07-21 Thread creatorsmithmdt at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69410 Zopolis0 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||creatorsmithmdt at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/106010] Miss vectorization for complex type copy.

2022-07-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106010 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1cc0e9a46e79e7ccc7f904b951e369b2b2647567 commit r13-1791-g1cc0e9a46e79e7ccc7f904b951e369b2b2647567 Author: liuhongt Date: Fri Jul

[Bug tree-optimization/106375] [13 regreesion] Lowering complex type mov regressed loop distribution for memset/memcpy/memmov.

2022-07-21 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106375 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- Related failed testcase FAIL: gcc.dg/pr56837.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "memset ..c, 68, 16384.;" 1

[Bug tree-optimization/106375] [13 regreesion] Lowering complex type mov regressed loop distribution for memset/memcpy/memmov.

2022-07-21 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106375 --- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu --- Similar case for scalar types. void foo1 (double* p, double* __restrict q) { for (int i = 0; i != 1000; i+=2) { p[i] = q[i]; p[i+1] = q[i+1]; } }

[Bug testsuite/106396] [13 regression] gcc.dg/pr23911.c fails after r13-1762-gf9d4c3b45c5ed5

2022-07-21 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106396 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org Status

[Bug middle-end/106010] Miss vectorization for complex type copy.

2022-07-21 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106010 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/106397] New: [13 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:645

2022-07-21 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106397 Bug ID: 106397 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:645 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords

[Bug c++/106398] New: ICE in finish_expr_stmt at cp/semantics.c:872 for lambda with conditional noexcept against lambda in unevaluated context

2022-07-21 Thread jbassett271 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106398 Bug ID: 106398 Summary: ICE in finish_expr_stmt at cp/semantics.c:872 for lambda with conditional noexcept against lambda in unevaluated context Product: gcc Ver

[Bug c++/106398] ICE in finish_expr_stmt at cp/semantics.c:872 for lambda with conditional noexcept against lambda in unevaluated context

2022-07-21 Thread jbassett271 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106398 --- Comment #1 from Justin Bassett --- Sorry about the repetition of the code example. That was some kind of bug in the website or browser where the pasted text did not show up except for the last copy. Let's give that code snippet one more time

[Bug debug/106399] New: Wrong debug info for function with nested function under O0

2022-07-21 Thread liyd2021 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106399 Bug ID: 106399 Summary: Wrong debug info for function with nested function under O0 Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/106400] New: Wrong debug info for function parameter in aarch64

2022-07-21 Thread liyd2021 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106400 Bug ID: 106400 Summary: Wrong debug info for function parameter in aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/106361] [11/12/13 Regression] Internal compiler error when creating an out-of-line operator==() = default

2022-07-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106361 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1503d946c06e2005c860f56231d2ea582a8a340f commit r11-10160-g1503d946c06e2005c860f56231d2ea582a8a340f Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/106202] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in move_fn_p, at cp/decl.cc:14907 since r12-885-gf71ca97def69b8ae

2022-07-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106202 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98423] The defaulted default constructor defined as deleted when one of variant member has a default member initializer

2022-07-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98423 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/106230] [12/13 Regression] ICE when building folly-2022.07.04.00 in pop_local_binding (cp/name-lookup.cc:2474) since r12-6328-gbeaee0a871b6485d

2022-07-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106230 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/106202] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in move_fn_p, at cp/decl.cc:14907 since r12-885-gf71ca97def69b8ae

2022-07-21 Thread herrtimson at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106202 --- Comment #8 from tt_1 --- hi, the fix for this is to be found in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106361 , right?

[Bug analyzer/106401] New: [13 Regression] ICE: in binding_cluster, at analyzer/store.cc:1110 with -fanalyzer

2022-07-21 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106401 Bug ID: 106401 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: in binding_cluster, at analyzer/store.cc:1110 with -fanalyzer Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywo

[Bug fortran/106402] New: half preicision is not supported by fortran(real*2).

2022-07-21 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106402 Bug ID: 106402 Summary: half preicision is not supported by fortran(real*2). Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

<    1   2