https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106292
Bug ID: 106292
Summary: Wrong code with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 106292, which changed state.
Bug 106292 Summary: Wrong code with -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106292
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106292
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106282
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-07-14
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106292
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Fixed with r13-1684-g554b21edb9ec91a8.
Thanks for tracking this down Martin.
Sorry for the pain. It was a silly oversight.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106293
Bug ID: 106293
Summary: 456.hmmer at -Ofast -march=native regressed by 19% on
zen2 and zen3 in July 2022
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106293
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106101
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Krebbel ---
We generate the movstrict target operand with gen_lowpart. If the operand for
gen_lowpart is already a paradoxical subreg the two subregs cancel each other
out and we end up with a plain reg. I'm testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106156
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29f40a8047fa9b6ccde2174ca126b78a535e1a61
commit r13-1696-g29f40a8047fa9b6ccde2174ca126b78a535e1a61
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106156
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106293
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106294
Bug ID: 106294
Summary: GCC accepts the undefined behavior operation in a
constant expression
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106293
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106190
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #53276|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652
Bug 81652 depends on bug 85620, which changed state.
Bug 85620 Summary: Missing ENDBR after swapcontext
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106295
Bug ID: 106295
Summary: INQUIRE statement bus error at runtime
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106295
--- Comment #1 from ghlixo at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 53297
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53297&action=edit
main program (to be compiled with latest release, e.g. 11.2.0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106295
--- Comment #2 from ghlixo at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 53298
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53298&action=edit
subroutine (to be compiled with older libfortran)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106295
--- Comment #3 from ghlixo at gmail dot com ---
That first attachment contains both parts of the code (main, subroutine). The
later ones are the individual pieces.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187
--- Comment #25 from Richard Earnshaw ---
A quick status update.
I've managed to reduce the testcase to the latest attachment. The program is
heavily reduced (so some bits likely don't make much sense), but the test still
'passes' when compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106296
Bug ID: 106296
Summary: Consider using fsync or fdatasync in
filesystem::copy_file
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106296
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
However, see https://github.com/boostorg/filesystem/issues/186
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106297
Bug ID: 106297
Summary: stringop-overflow misbehaviour on atomic
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105041
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Surya Kumari Jangala
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0380d008b1474373852fd2fc921886491304f854
commit r12-8568-g0380d008b1474373852fd2fc921886491304f854
Author: Surya K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106086
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-07-14
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106286
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Compare with e.g.:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/file-meaning-1.c
which tests this for the sm-file.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106298
Bug ID: 106298
Summary: RFE: analyzer handling of dup, dup2, and dup3
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106299
Bug ID: 106299
Summary: RFE: analyzer handling of fdopen
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106300
Bug ID: 106300
Summary: RFE: analyzer support for more ways of obtaining an
open file descriptor
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106301
Bug ID: 106301
Summary: RFE: analyzer support of mmap
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106301
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Potentially we could also track the allocated region, and complain if it is
leaked. I think this would require handling of mmap/munmap in sm-malloc.cc (so
that we can detect leaks), and support in the regio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106302
Bug ID: 106302
Summary: RFE: provide a way for -fanalyzer to use target flags
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106297
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-07-14
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 53299
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53299&action=edit
A patch
=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib --with-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 13.0.0 20220714 (experimental) [master r13-1696-g29f40a8047f] (GCC)
[558] %
[558] % gcctk -O3 -fno-inline-small-functions small.c
small.c: In function ‘k’:
small.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106303
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |13.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106280
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Macleod ---
Created attachment 53300
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53300&action=edit
proposed patch
See if this helps.
All of the lookup routines check to see first is there is an existing re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106304
Bug ID: 106304
Summary: [modules] ICE compiling dynamic_cast in constexpr
function (in tree_node, at cp/module.cc:9183)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
-sanitizers
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib --with-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 13.0.0 20220714 (experimental) [master r13-1696-g29f40a8047f] (GCC)
[526] %
[526] % gcctk -O1 -funreachable-traps small.c
small.c:10
--prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk --enable-sanitizers
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib --with-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 13.0.0 20220714 (experimental) [master r13-1696-g29f40a8047f] (GCC)
[548
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106249
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106306
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106305
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106061
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106307
Bug ID: 106307
Summary: error when I do a test on a pointer on Arduino 1.8.19
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101347
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63400
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #5)
> BTW, what if the clock_gettime call failed? The current implementation does
> nothing about error handling... (Though for QPC on Windows it should rarely
> fail f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63400
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #4)
> With mingw-w64, the following program shows that the monotonic clock is far
> more precise:
>
> #include
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> using namespace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106295
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think the fix for PR83036 (INQUIRE specifier NEXTREC is a 4-byte integer,
should be 8), which changed the layout of struct st_parameter_inquire,
could explain what you observe.
I have no soluti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106298
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106299
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106301
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106209
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100799
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bergner at gcc dot gnu.org |jskumari at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106209
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 07:35:21PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> > Instead of an assert(), simply return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106209
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:748f8a8b145dde59c7b63aa68b5a59515b7efc49
commit r13-1698-g748f8a8b145dde59c7b63aa68b5a59515b7efc49
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106209
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106284
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103798
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6cf555a88f8ffb8ec85c2b94fe656ab217260ea
commit r13-1699-gc6cf555a88f8ffb8ec85c2b94fe656ab217260ea
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Jun 17 07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106308
Bug ID: 106308
Summary: Consider using statx(2) for std::filesystem
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106309
Bug ID: 106309
Summary: ICE: error reporting routines re-entered
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106309
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106310
Bug ID: 106310
Summary: Failure to resolve call to template member function in
template base class.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106310
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is a C++ defect report about this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106310
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
template
struct set{};
template< typename T >
struct Base
{
template< int > int set(T const &) { }
};
template< typename T >
struct Derived : Base< T >
{
void f(T const &
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106310
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Failure to resolve call to |[12/13 Regregression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106311
Bug ID: 106311
Summary: internal compiler error in redeclare_class_template
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106311
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106113
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kong Lingling :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae69e6f61b93dcb5b1e7ef609431f100c1b9b2e5
commit r13-1702-gae69e6f61b93dcb5b1e7ef609431f100c1b9b2e5
Author: konglin1
Date: Fri Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106297
--- Comment #2 from Илья Шипицин ---
I have provided repro steps, hope they can be used to find any answer.
I tried to add "-save-temps", but it gave another error (not seen without that
option):
CC src/slz.o
In file included from src/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84695
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
74 matches
Mail list logo
