[Bug target/105930] [12/13 Regression] Excessive stack spill generation on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105930 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/106243] New: Failure to optimize (0 - x) & 1 on vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106243 Bug ID: 106243 Summary: Failure to optimize (0 - x) & 1 on vector type Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug tree-optimization/106063] [12 Regression] ICE: in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:281 with -O2 -fno-tree-forwprop --param=evrp-mode=legacy-first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106063 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Dimitar Dimitrov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ebbf3906895bcb40d7ff2729cf46deae66bc268 commit r13-1595-g4ebbf3906895bcb40d7ff2729cf46deae66bc268 Author: Dimitar Dimitrov Dat

[Bug tree-optimization/106244] New: Failure to optimize (1 << x) & 1 to `x == 0` if separated into multiple statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106244 Bug ID: 106244 Summary: Failure to optimize (1 << x) & 1 to `x == 0` if separated into multiple statements Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug tree-optimization/106245] New: Failure to optimize (u8)(a << 7) >> 7 pattern to a & 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106245 Bug ID: 106245 Summary: Failure to optimize (u8)(a << 7) >> 7 pattern to a & 1 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug tree-optimization/106246] New: [13 Regression] powerpc-darwin9 bootstrap fails after r13-1575-gcf3a120084e946 ICE vect_transform_loops, at tree-vectorizer.cc:1032

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106246 Bug ID: 106246 Summary: [13 Regression] powerpc-darwin9 bootstrap fails after r13-1575-gcf3a120084e946 ICE vect_transform_loops, at tree-vectorizer.cc:1032 Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/106246] [13 Regression] powerpc-darwin9 bootstrap fails after r13-1575-gcf3a120084e946 ICE vect_transform_loops, at tree-vectorizer.cc:1032

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106246 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirm

[Bug c++/106241] compiler can't handle large array of strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106241 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, like https://wg21.link/p1967r7 But in the meantime, you can create a static array of trivial types (not std::string) and then iterate over it at runtime to copy the values into the data structure yo

[Bug c++/106241] compiler can't handle large array of strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106241 --- Comment #5 from Robert Durkacz --- That is a good idea. On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 at 19:56, redi at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106241 > > --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely

[Bug preprocessor/91733] No longer treat carriage return as an end-of-line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91733 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/106247] New: GCC12 warning in Eigen: array subscript is partly outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106247 Bug ID: 106247 Summary: GCC12 warning in Eigen: array subscript is partly outside array bounds Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug target/105930] [12/13 Regression] Excessive stack spill generation on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105930 --- Comment #28 from Linus Torvalds --- (In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #27) > This should now be fixed on both mainline and the GCC 12 release branch. Thanks everybody. Looks like the xchg optimization isn't in the gcc-12 release branch

[Bug tree-optimization/106247] GCC12 warning in Eigen: array subscript is partly outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106247 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/106247] GCC12 warning in Eigen: array subscript is partly outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106247 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- the warning is correct in the sense the load is there in IR, though it looks like it is dead (but only because b and a are unused): array.7_137 = (long unsigned int) &MEM [(void *)&b + 8B]; _139 = array

[Bug tree-optimization/106247] GCC12 warning in Eigen: array subscript is partly outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106247 Fedor Chelnokov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug tree-optimization/106247] GCC12 warning in Eigen: array subscript is partly outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106247 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/106245] Failure to optimize (u8)(a << 7) >> 7 pattern to a & 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106245 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/25521] change semantics of const volatile variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25521 Jose E. Marchesi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jose.marchesi at oracle dot com --- C

[Bug middle-end/25521] change semantics of const volatile variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25521 --- Comment #7 from Jose E. Marchesi --- If, as a workaround, I try to use a `section' attribute, like in: __attribute__((section(".rodata"))) volatile const int lala = 0; I don't get an ICE, but a section with write permissions: .section

[Bug tree-optimization/106244] Failure to optimize (1 << x) & 1 to `x == 0` if separated into multiple statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106244 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-07-10 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/106243] Failure to optimize (0 - x) & 1 on gimple level (including vector types)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106243 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Failure to optimize (0 - x) |Failure to optimize (0 - x)

[Bug c++/106241] compiler can't handle large array of strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106241 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/105838] [10/11/12/13 Regression] g++ 12.1.0 runs out of memory or time when building const std::vector of std::strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105838 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||robert.durkacz at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug preprocessor/97498] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-function" inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97498 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0587cef3d7962a8b0f44779589ba2920dd3d71e5 commit r13-1596-g0587cef3d7962a8b0f44779589ba2920dd3d71e5 Author: Lewis Hyatt Date: Sat Ju

[Bug preprocessor/97498] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-function" inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97498 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/106248] New: operator>>std::basic_istream at boundary condition behave differently in different opt levels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106248 Bug ID: 106248 Summary: operator>>std::basic_istream at boundary condition behave differently in different opt levels Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/25521] change semantics of const volatile variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25521 --- Comment #8 from Jose E. Marchesi --- After a little discussion in IRC I filed this LLVM bug: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56468 Regarding the ICE described by Ulrich, I cannot reproduce it using: bpf-unknown-none-gcc (GCC) 13.

[Bug tree-optimization/106249] New: ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:645

-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: asolokha at gmx dot com Target Milestone: --- gfortran 13.0.0 20220710 snapshot (g:0587cef3d7962a8b0f44779589ba2920dd3d71e5) ICEs when

[Bug tree-optimization/106249] [13 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:645

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106249 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Summary|ICE in

[Bug libstdc++/106248] operator>>std::basic_istream at boundary condition behave differently in different opt levels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106248 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #1 from Andrew P

[Bug target/106228] [13 regression] r13-1457-g10b502fb78351a causes bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED --- Comment #13 from Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/106246] [13 Regression] powerpc-darwin9 bootstrap fails after r13-1575-gcf3a120084e946 ICE vect_transform_loops, at tree-vectorizer.cc:1032

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106246 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/106237] [13 regression] serveral tests begin ICEing starting with r13-1575-gcf3a120084e946

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106237 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/106246] [13 Regression] powerpc-darwin9 bootstrap fails after r13-1575-gcf3a120084e946 ICE vect_transform_loops, at tree-vectorizer.cc:1032

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106246 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Maybe a duplicate of PR106228. I can't reproduce with the fix for that in > the tree. Is there anything besides --target=powerpc-darwin9 to use? Any > -mcpu=?

[Bug tree-optimization/106250] New: [13 Regression] ICE in optab_for_tree_code, at optabs-tree.cc:96

-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: asolokha at gmx dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: aarch64-linux-gnu gcc 13.0.0 20220710 snapshot (g