[Bug c++/106230] New: ICE when building folly-2022.07.04.00 in pop_local_binding (cp/name-lookup.cc:2474)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106230 Bug ID: 106230 Summary: ICE when building folly-2022.07.04.00 in pop_local_binding (cp/name-lookup.cc:2474) Product: gcc Version: 12.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug c++/106230] ICE when building folly-2022.07.04.00 in pop_local_binding (cp/name-lookup.cc:2474)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106230 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Created attachment 53275 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53275&action=edit ccHXKhJc.ii (minimised reproducer) I think I need to re-run cvise because the minimised version doesn't build with

[Bug c++/106230] ICE when building folly-2022.07.04.00 in pop_local_binding (cp/name-lookup.cc:2474)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106230 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Ignore me on the last part re Clang. It doesn't build there either with the reduced version or original because of fortify bits.

[Bug tree-optimization/106226] [13 Regression] ICE in vect_do_peeling, at tree-vect-loop-manip.cc:2702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106226 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug testsuite/106227] [13 regression] g++.dg/modules/loc-prune-4.C fails after r13-1506-g069f46c71e9432

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106227 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug c++/106230] ICE when building folly-2022.07.04.00 in pop_local_binding (cp/name-lookup.cc:2474)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106230 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- Clang does build with the original (folly) if I don't preprocess it.

[Bug target/106228] [13 regression] r13-1457-g10b502fb78351a causes bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-07-08 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/106063] [12/13 Regression] ICE: in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:281 with -O2 -fno-tree-forwprop --param=evrp-mode=legacy-first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106063 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7854e2faf7640230062dec3596e71773ca500ed commit r13-1573-gf7854e2faf7640230062dec3596e71773ca500ed Author: Tamar Christina Date:

[Bug lto/106170] [13 Regression] x86_64-w64-mingw32 host GCC with win32 thread model does not provide pthread.h. lto-plugin fails with canadian compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106170 --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška --- > So it does not matter not for adding locks for windows hosts? No need for > using CriticalSection APIs as locks? Well, we need the critical section for the multi-threaded linker mold for that we define a

[Bug c++/106230] [12/13 Regression] ICE when building folly-2022.07.04.00 in pop_local_binding (cp/name-lookup.cc:2474) since r12-6328-gbeaee0a871b6485d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106230 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/106228] [13 regression] r13-1457-g10b502fb78351a causes bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org See

[Bug tree-optimization/106226] [13 Regression] ICE in vect_do_peeling, at tree-vect-loop-manip.cc:2702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106226 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Hm, there's .LOAD_LANES. OK, so the present spot for updating virtual SSA form is where we think we need it but that might be when analyzing a totally different loop for vectorization. I'm testing a patch

[Bug d/101691] d: Use of LOOP_EXPR prevents removing no-op loops.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101691 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/106231] New: sign-extension of the result of `__builtin_tzcnt()`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106231 Bug ID: 106231 Summary: sign-extension of the result of `__builtin_tzcnt()` Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug target/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 Mathieu Malaterre changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #53271|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 --- Comment #13 from Mathieu Malaterre --- Created attachment 53277 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53277&action=edit gcc-12 -save-temps

[Bug target/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 --- Comment #14 from Mathieu Malaterre --- @Richard I've uploaded the generated *.ii files (-save-temps), as discussed with upstream: * https://github.com/google/highway/issues/776#issuecomment-1177864014 I do not know the codebase very well

[Bug tree-optimization/106138] Inefficient code generation: logical AND of disjoint booleans from equal and bitwise AND not optimized to constant false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106138 --- Comment #7 from Pavel M --- May be useful: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/new-code-optimizer. Search for "Bit Estimator" section containing "Folding comparisons and branches".

[Bug demangler/106232] New: stack exhausted when using '-s dlang' in d-demangle.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106232 Bug ID: 106232 Summary: stack exhausted when using '-s dlang' in d-demangle.c Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug tree-optimization/105740] missed optimization switch transformation for conditions with duplicate conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105740 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- > Sorry, it not a bug, got to know that switch lower and switch conversion are > doing two different things, different with "pass_lower_switch > also performs the transforms switch-conversion does" in c#4?

[Bug target/100799] Stackoverflow in optimized code on PPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100799 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Grund --- Hi, it's more than 1 year later now. Peter seemingly has a simple reproducer. Is there anything new on this? Any patch to fix that or at least anything to try or a workaround like disabling a specific opti

[Bug tree-optimization/106226] [13 Regression] ICE in vect_do_peeling, at tree-vect-loop-manip.cc:2702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106226 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf3a120084e94614a4917f71940325cd4b537f24 commit r13-1575-gcf3a120084e94614a4917f71940325cd4b537f24 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/106226] [13 Regression] ICE in vect_do_peeling, at tree-vect-loop-manip.cc:2702

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106226 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/106228] [13 regression] r13-1457-g10b502fb78351a causes bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #4 from Richard Bi

[Bug bootstrap/106156] [13 Regression] libtool fails to link liblto_plugin.la on riscv64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106156 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug sanitizer/106132] ICE: in report_conflicting_sanitizer_options, at opts.cc:1011 with -fsanitize=thread,address,kernel-hwaddress

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106132 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6da7f7c5ac03f85a753989712588511e5f56e73d commit r13-1576-g6da7f7c5ac03f85a753989712588511e5f56e73d Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed

[Bug sanitizer/106132] ICE: in report_conflicting_sanitizer_options, at opts.cc:1011 with -fsanitize=thread,address,kernel-hwaddress

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106132 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/106196] [13 Regression] vect_do_peeling ICE since g:3769ad4ccea9589b3f7edaef901cb542aa10f49a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106196 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/106196] [13 Regression] vect_do_peeling ICE since g:3769ad4ccea9589b3f7edaef901cb542aa10f49a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106196 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #4) > Some benchmarks are still failing with the same error, just different line > numbers > > during GIMPLE pass: vect > include/dofs/dof_tools.h: In function 'ma

[Bug tree-optimization/105651] [12/13 Regression] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string and operator+ at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection,| |needs-reduction

[Bug middle-end/106196] [13 Regression] vect_do_peeling ICE since g:3769ad4ccea9589b3f7edaef901cb542aa10f49a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106196 --- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #4) > > Some benchmarks are still failing with the same error, just different line > > I am reducing a testcase now.

[Bug c++/106233] New: Designated initializers targeting inherited fields breaks reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:6456

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106233 Bug ID: 106233 Summary: Designated initializers targeting inherited fields breaks reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:6456 Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/105918] [12/13 Regression] Spurious Warray-bounds in std::to_chars since r12-2132-ga110855667782dac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105918 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-07-08 Keywords|needs-bise

[Bug middle-end/106173] -fleading-underscore option inactive although reported as active

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106173 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug middle-end/103438] Updated documentation for gcc Optimization command line options (sec 3.11)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103438 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcn at onet dot pl --- Comment #17 from

[Bug middle-end/106196] [13 Regression] vect_do_peeling ICE since g:3769ad4ccea9589b3f7edaef901cb542aa10f49a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106196 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug target/106228] [13 regression] r13-1457-g10b502fb78351a causes bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/106234] New: [13 Regression] stack overflow from range_from_dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106234 Bug ID: 106234 Summary: [13 Regression] stack overflow from range_from_dom Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/106233] Designated initializers targeting inherited fields breaks reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:6456

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106233 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/106233] Designated initializers targeting inherited fields breaks reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:6456

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106233 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/106234] [13 Regression] stack overflow from range_from_dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106234 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/106234] [13 Regression] stack overflow from range_from_dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106234 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Macleod --- > it looks like range_from_dom walks up immediate dominators but in that loop > recurses to itself!? isn't that quadratic? shouldn't the recursion stop > at the next immediate dominator of the recursion

[Bug target/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 --- Comment #15 from Richard Earnshaw --- What's the output of "gcc -v" for the failing compiler(s)?

[Bug analyzer/106235] New: RFE: -fanalyzer could complain about tainted data triggering assertion failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106235 Bug ID: 106235 Summary: RFE: -fanalyzer could complain about tainted data triggering assertion failure Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/106101] [12/13 Regression] ICE in reg_bitfield_target_p since r12-4428-g147ed0184f403b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106101 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE in |[12/13 Regression] ICE in

[Bug analyzer/106235] RFE: -fanalyzer could complain about tainted data triggering assertion failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106235 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Juliet 1.3 has various testcases for this in C/testcases/CWE617_Reachable_Assertion/

[Bug target/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 --- Comment #16 from Mathieu Malaterre --- This is one is producing wrong code: % gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/11/lto-wrapper Target: arm-linux-gnueabihf Configured with: ../s

[Bug bootstrap/106172] Multiple ICEs building gcc-13 with gcc-12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106172 --- Comment #19 from Chris Clayton --- Hi On 04/07/2022 00:12, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106172 > > Andrew Pinski changed: > >What|Removed |Added > --

[Bug preprocessor/91733] No longer treat carriage return as an end-of-line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91733 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2bd15617e73acf76207127e5580cd10b1fab91a5 commit r13-1577-g2bd15617e73acf76207127e5580cd10b1fab91a5 Author: Lewis Hyatt Date: Thu Ju

[Bug preprocessor/91733] No longer treat carriage return as an end-of-line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91733 --- Comment #6 from Lewis Hyatt --- The diagnostics issue is fixed now. Do we want to mark this resolved, or keep it open given the other question regarding support for \r line endings in general?

[Bug target/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 --- Comment #17 from Richard Earnshaw --- And what options are you passing to cmake?

[Bug target/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 --- Comment #18 from Mathieu Malaterre --- The complete line to generate the *.ii file is: ``` % /usr/bin/g++ -DHWY_STATIC_DEFINE -I/home/malat/highway -O2 -fstrict-aliasing -ggdb3 -fPIE -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wno-buil

[Bug c/106236] New: Not a bug, bad performance (with GCC 11.3.0 - O3) of a small etude in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106236 Bug ID: 106236 Summary: Not a bug, bad performance (with GCC 11.3.0 - O3) of a small etude in C Product: gcc Version: og11 (devel/omp/gcc-11) Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/91733] No longer treat carriage return as an end-of-line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91733 --- Comment #7 from Akim Demaille --- Personally the bug I reported was the one you fixed. I merely suggested to drop \r, but I did asked for that. So AFAIC, you may close this issue. Thanks a lot for the fix!

[Bug target/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 --- Comment #19 from Richard Earnshaw --- Hmm, I'm not sure that makes sense to me. AFAICT highway requires an Arm CPU with Neon, but the default compiler flags that you posted (-mthumb -march=armv7-a+fp) does not provide that.

[Bug target/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 --- Comment #20 from Mathieu Malaterre --- The Debian package highway 0.17.0-9 is not build with neon option (aka ARM7=OFF in cmake), the code build just fine and test suite run fine (-O1): * https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=highw

[Bug target/106228] [13 regression] r13-1457-g10b502fb78351a causes bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It is still failing though it looks like at a slightly different point: libtool: compile: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./gcc/ -B/home/seur

[Bug target/106228] [13 regression] r13-1457-g10b502fb78351a causes bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- Please provide preprocessed source > Am 08.07.2022 um 17:32 schrieb seurer at gcc dot gnu.org > : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 > > --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc

[Bug testsuite/106216] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/alias-access-path-13.c fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106216 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b984b84cbe4bf026edef2ba37685f3958a1dc1cf commit r13-1578-gb984b84cbe4bf026edef2ba37685f3958a1dc1cf Author: Martin Jambor Date: F

[Bug testsuite/106216] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/alias-access-path-13.c fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106216 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/106228] [13 regression] r13-1457-g10b502fb78351a causes bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 --- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner --- Created attachment 53280 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53280&action=edit Preprocessed test case Here is the preprocessed source file that shows the ICE: seurer@bns:/tmp$ /home/seurer

[Bug target/106228] [13 regression] r13-1457-g10b502fb78351a causes bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/100799] Stackoverflow in optimized code on PPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100799 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/106228] [13 regression] r13-1457-g10b502fb78351a causes bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 --- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The configure options may be making a difference. Here are the ones I was using: --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --with-cpu=power7 --disable-bootstrap --enable-multilib

[Bug target/106228] [13 regression] r13-1457-g10b502fb78351a causes bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 --- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to seurer from comment #10) > The configure options may be making a difference. Here are the ones I was > using: --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --with-cpu=power7 > --disable-bootstrap --enable

[Bug tree-optimization/106064] Wrong code comparing two global zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106064 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 --- Comment #21 from Richard Earnshaw --- I've finally managed to reproduce the test failure (someone has turned off emu128 in the sources I have). Rebuilding the failing test with -fno-strict-aliasing causes the test to pass. That strongly su

[Bug target/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 --- Comment #22 from Richard Earnshaw --- I notice that the sources seem to do floating-point negation by casting values to integers, xor-ing the sign bit and then casting the result back to a float. This is exactly the sort of operation that i

[Bug middle-end/96032] RFE: add a way to use output from --fdiagnostics-format=json as input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96032 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- I posted a prototype implementation of this here: "[PATCH 00/12] RFC: Replay of serialized diagnostics" https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-June/597051.html (doesn't fully work; see the many

[Bug middle-end/106236] Not a bug, bad performance (with GCC 11.3.0 - O3) of a small etude in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106236 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Note the jumps are not the issue here.

[Bug target/106228] [13 regression] r13-1457-g10b502fb78351a causes bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106228 --- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- There are some test cases that started ICEing with r13-1575-gcf3a120084e946 which fail at the same place in tree-vectorizer.cc:1032. These fail on LE on power 8/9/10. spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home

[Bug target/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 --- Comment #23 from Jan Wassenberg --- Thanks for having a look. For casting, we CopyBytes between the two representations, which boils down to __builtin_memcpy (https://github.com/google/highway/blob/master/hwy/base.h#L819). Is there some othe

[Bug tree-optimization/106234] [13 Regression] stack overflow from range_from_dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106234 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod --- Created attachment 53281 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53281&action=edit proposed patch we're having some connection issues, but I am in the process of trying to test the attached p

[Bug tree-optimization/106138] Inefficient code generation: logical AND of disjoint booleans from equal and bitwise AND not optimized to constant false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106138 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Pavel M from comment #7) > May be useful: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/new-code-optimizer. > Search for "Bit Estimator" section containing "Folding comparisons and > branches". All of

[Bug tree-optimization/106237] New: [13 regression] serveral tests begin ICEing starting with r13-1575-gcf3a120084e946

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106237 Bug ID: 106237 Summary: [13 regression] serveral tests begin ICEing starting with r13-1575-gcf3a120084e946 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug middle-end/106231] sign-extension of the result of `__builtin_ctz`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106231 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|target

[Bug target/106231] sign-extension of the result of `__builtin_ctz`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106231 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||71775 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/106233] [11 Regression] Designated initializers targeting inherited fields breaks reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:6456

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106233 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|--

[Bug lto/106170] [13 Regression] x86_64-w64-mingw32 host GCC with win32 thread model does not provide pthread.h. lto-plugin fails with canadian compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106170 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #12) > > So it does not matter not for adding locks for windows hosts? No need for > > using CriticalSection APIs as locks? > > Well, we need the critical section for

[Bug lto/106170] [13 Regression] x86_64-w64-mingw32 host GCC with win32 thread model does not provide pthread.h. lto-plugin fails with canadian compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106170 --- Comment #14 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #12) > > > So it does not matter not for adding locks for windows hosts? No need for > > > using CriticalSection APIs as lock

[Bug fortran/95375] ICE in add_use_op, Error: mismatching comparison operand types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95375 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/83473] pragma problems with raw string literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83473 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug libstdc++/106238] New: Inline optimization causes dangling pointer on "include/c++/12.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106238 Bug ID: 106238 Summary: Inline optimization causes dangling pointer on "include/c++/12.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h" Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug tree-optimization/106238] Inline optimization causes dangling pointer on "include/c++/12.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106238 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug testsuite/106120] [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- The XPASS:es seem to be the same for everyone, with the FAIL only appearing on ILP32. Aldy, how about correcting those xfail markers and adding one for ILP32?

[Bug tree-optimization/106087] [12/13 Regression] ICE with inline-asm with multiple output and assigned only static vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106087 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71e3daa31cfa35ee58e5899cb00767be92227fd2 commit r13-1581-g71e3daa31cfa35ee58e5899cb00767be92227fd2 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: T

[Bug tree-optimization/106087] [12 Regression] ICE with inline-asm with multiple output and assigned only static vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106087 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.3.0, 13.0 Summary|[12/13

[Bug libstdc++/106239] New: vector::resize(size_type, const value_type&) should not require copy-assignability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106239 Bug ID: 106239 Summary: vector::resize(size_type, const value_type&) should not require copy-assignability Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug tree-optimization/106240] New: [13 Regression] Recent change causes missed vectorization opportunity on mips

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106240 Bug ID: 106240 Summary: [13 Regression] Recent change causes missed vectorization opportunity on mips Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/106239] vector::resize(size_type, const value_type&) should not require copy-assignability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106239 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector/resize (I know exactly not the C++ standard but usually gives a good summary of it): -T must meet the requirements of CopyInsertable in order to use ov

[Bug libstdc++/106239] vector::resize(size_type, const value_type&) should not require copy-assignability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106239 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue2033 Officially made it CopyInsertable: Requires: T shall be MoveInsertable into *this and CopyInsertable into *this. CopyInsertable is basically: ::new((void*)p) T(v)

[Bug tree-optimization/106240] [13 Regression] Recent change causes missed vectorization opportunity on mips

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106240 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Keywords|

[Bug testsuite/106120] [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4) > The XPASS:es seem to be the same for everyone, with the FAIL only appearing > on ILP32. > > Aldy, how about correcting those xfail markers and adding one