https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106153
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106118
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51debf7f857dddfb4dd2493867d2648041e7d8de
commit r13-1377-g51debf7f857dddfb4dd2493867d2648041e7d8de
Author: Pekka Seppänen
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106118
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106156
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106126
--- Comment #19 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 53232
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53232&action=edit
gzipped C++ source code
I have a third test case. I suspect it is a duplicate of #2,
but could I ask you t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106156
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105874
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90129d39ca0fc1d2ac9cf960379feccea878bd90
commit r13-1378-g90129d39ca0fc1d2ac9cf960379feccea878bd90
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106144
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Created attachment 53228 [details]
> gcc13-pr106144.patch
>
> Untested fix.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100695
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 53233
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53233&action=edit
Patch which does not work (segfault during self test) – but maybe it gives an
idea how to solve the issue
I th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106122
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17419b61edd350147b0cc10c3da0b8461e51a42c
commit r13-1380-g17419b61edd350147b0cc10c3da0b8461e51a42c
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106145
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
also reported as https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106144
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e52592073f6df3d7a3acd9f0436dcc32a8b7493d
commit r13-1381-ge52592073f6df3d7a3acd9f0436dcc32a8b7493d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
Bug ID: 106157
Summary: ICE verify_ssa failed since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106158
Bug ID: 106158
Summary: IPA SRA ssa_name_only_returned_p is quadratic
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106149
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106158
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
ipa SRA: 56.58 ( 28%) 0.00 ( 0%) 56.60 ( 28%)
552 ( 0%)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106158
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
That is with -O2 -funswitch-loops -fno-thread-jumps -fno-tree-dominator-opts
-fno-tree-vrp plus some changes to make unswitching SSA update cheaper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106159
Bug ID: 106159
Summary: Have -Woverloaded-virtual not warn about virtual
destructors?
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106031
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106160
Bug ID: 106160
Summary: invariant motion DF RD problem invokes quadratic
behavior
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
20220701 (experimental) [master bb6325c8ad2] (x86_64-suse-linux) |
| Assert_Failure failed precondition from sinfo-nodes.ads:3970
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104477
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
They are defined by the standard, as library traits. The intrinsics are needed
to implement what the standard defines.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105842
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jlame646 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106046
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106161
Bug ID: 106161
Summary: Dubious choice of optimization strategy
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99918
Franek Korta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fkorta at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106161
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106161
--- Comment #2 from Victor Luchitz ---
Created attachment 53234
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53234&action=edit
Test case
Minimal test case.
You can see in the disassembly the same pattern as described in the original
re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106161
--- Comment #3 from Victor Luchitz ---
Compilation flags used: -c -std=c11 -g -m2 -mb -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall
-Wextra -pedantic -Wno-unused-parameter -Wimplicit-fallthrough=0
-Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wnonnull
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106082
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
And I'll confirm that m68k bootstrapped and regression tested. The various
failures introduced by the 105231 change have all been fixed. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106000
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|RFE: -fanalyzer should |RFE: -fanalyzer should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07ac550393d00fcadcee21b44abee6bb30c93949
commit r13-1390-g07ac550393d00fcadcee21b44abee6bb30c93949
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c17206709f94331e81443e2bdcf135a6ab7428ce
commit r12-8533-gc17206709f94331e81443e2bdcf135a6ab7428ce
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105779
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9130880f77c7f9ffd5deaabda605bc151521be5
commit r12-8534-gd9130880f77c7f9ffd5deaabda605bc151521be5
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105541
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1c8ee2627696717013ebdb1ca3f5f97a76b1cb9
commit r12-8535-gb1c8ee2627696717013ebdb1ca3f5f97a76b1cb9
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105779
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aefe23f720a542e90ecc6629885b01d44139b043
commit r13-1392-gaefe23f720a542e90ecc6629885b01d44139b043
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105541
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105908
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105964
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105039
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9234cdca6ee88badfc00297e72f13dac4e540c79
commit r13-1393-g9234cdca6ee88badfc00297e72f13dac4e540c79
Author: Nick Clifton
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105039
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106111
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ea6c59349793761b9c00f75ef281ac413566b2f
commit r13-1394-g2ea6c59349793761b9c00f75ef281ac413566b2f
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106111
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103722
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Joseph Myers
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:962e7f0803f163f9cf44d64a2e199935d3f361fe
commit r12-8536-g962e7f0803f163f9cf44d64a2e199935d3f361fe
Author: Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103722
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e748398b3ef6412ef35b85ef6b0893809aeb49cd
commit r12-8537-ge748398b3ef6412ef35b85ef6b0893809aeb49cd
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105550
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ecd11acacd6be57af930fa617d7c31ecb40e7f74
commit r13-1397-gecd11acacd6be57af930fa617d7c31ecb40e7f74
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100252
Bug 100252 depends on bug 105550, which changed state.
Bug 105550 Summary: Missing copy elision with conditional operator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105550
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105550
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:252e9dfee9b1d01e0e44773ad83e0e44f3650945
commit r11-10100-g252e9dfee9b1d01e0e44773ad83e0e44f3650945
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105813
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9902f93edd43853cd958b2e124878865da69a177
commit r11-10101-g9902f93edd43853cd958b2e124878865da69a177
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105813
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1214ebb39cd250fda678ec89c785fcea86888a89
commit r10-10876-g1214ebb39cd250fda678ec89c785fcea86888a89
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105813
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106126
--- Comment #20 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #19)
> I have a third test case. I suspect it is a duplicate of #2,
> but could I ask you to confirm this, please ?
>
> It is part of the same package as #2, wx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105691
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:614d9e76b71df6c5ad42f2b9c2a8156e8b3ebd35
commit r11-10102-g614d9e76b71df6c5ad42f2b9c2a8156e8b3ebd35
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105691
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6db08d9183b80b0ada5122fae79412544279f56
commit r10-10877-ge6db08d9183b80b0ada5122fae79412544279f56
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105691
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106162
Bug ID: 106162
Summary: libstdc++v3: bits/largefile-config.h.tmp: No such file
or directory race condition
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106162
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 53235
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53235&action=edit
build.log.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105860
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105954
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7296a7c9aa35a9731a73e33c29f6bbc488a0c837
commit r11-10103-g7296a7c9aa35a9731a73e33c29f6bbc488a0c837
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105954
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bac42273343bb9a198704900e2118ed4e84cb23a
commit r10-10878-gbac42273343bb9a198704900e2118ed4e84cb23a
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The issue can be studied by playing with option -fmax-stack-var-size=n.
-fno-automatic corresponds to n=0; using n=64 and higher lets the code compile.
There's something weird going on here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105860
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
I proposed a fix on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-July/597674.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106162
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #0)
> There is a race condition when (I speculate) libstdcv++v3 is built in
> parallel from different 'make' processes. Perhaps for c++98 | c++11 | x++17
> inst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106162
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think the errors are actually saying the directory doesn't exist, and are
coming from the three shell commands that redirect to that rule using >> $@.tmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106162
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The header target is missing a prerequisite of stamp-${host_alias}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106162
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Ev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106162
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #0)
> > There is a race condition when (I speculate) libstdcv++v3 is built in
> > parallel from different 'ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106162
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a6ee426c2be3bd4359520e02c00ec60cac2fece
commit r13-1400-g8a6ee426c2be3bd4359520e02c00ec60cac2fece
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106162
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk, but worth backporting to all branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106162
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105903
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 53237
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53237&action=edit
testcase
Even though it was included in comment #0, I am attaching it as it easier to
figure out what the test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105903
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
After my patches for PR 96923 (and PR 100864), we get:
_22 = _16 > _17;
... (some dead statements that PHI-OPT adds due to match and simplify)
_8 = _16 >= _17;
_13 = _8 & _22;
But there is nothing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106163
Bug ID: 106163
Summary: generic-match does not honor -fnon-call-exceptions
-fno-delete-dead-exceptions
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106163
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
This was originally reported against gccgo at https://go.dev/issue/53019.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106164
Bug ID: 106164
Summary: (a > b) & (a >= b) does not get optimized until
reassoc1
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106163
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most likely the code here needs to be changed slightly.
fprintf_indent (f, indent,
"if (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (captures[%d]))\n",
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106164
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is done by fold_range_test in fold-const.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106165
Bug ID: 106165
Summary: incorrect result when using inlined asm implementation
of floor() on i686
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91429
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106166
Bug ID: 106166
Summary: Improve diagnostic for explicit constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106165
--- Comment #1 from xeioex ---
TO fix the last confirmations
1) gcc -O2 minified_to_string_radix.i -o 507 -lm && ./507
1e+23.toString(36) = ga894a06ac8
ERROR expected "ga894a06abs"
2) gcc -O1 minified_to_string_radix.i -o 507 -lm &&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xeioexception at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106165
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106164
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106164
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > This is done by fold_range_test in fold-const.cc
>
> Actually no, it is fold_truth_andor_1. Anyways I am go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106164
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is the match.pd code:
(for bitop (bit_and bit_ior)
(for cmp (tcc_comparison)
(for ocmp (tcc_comparison)
(for ncmp (tcc_comparison)
(simplify
(bitop (cmp:c @0 @1) (ocmp @0 @1))
(with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105903
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> After my patches for PR 96923 (and PR 100864), we get:
>
>
> _22 = _16 > _17;
> ... (some dead statements that PHI-OPT adds due to match and simplify)
> _
91 matches
Mail list logo
