https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106025
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Incorrect optimization at |[13 Regression] Incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> > Here is a testcase which shows this was latent but fails in GCC 7+ (so it is
> > still a regression):
> > int a, b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106033
Bug ID: 106033
Summary: [13 Regression] libgo fails with error: reference to
undefined name ‘_libgo_loff_t_type’ since
r13-1159-g7f195a2270910a
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106019
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-06-20
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106027
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-06-20
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105996
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105998
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106001
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105729
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105951
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105871
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106008
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106008
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106010
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106012
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Component|tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106012
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
> recip pass is converting to .RSQRT, target is just expanding what it gets.
But it queries the target for support for RSQRT, but yeah, we lack to ask for
"implici
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106018
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
it's going to be "interesting" if the arguments or return types need
construction (C++).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105956
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Note I see the same error for inkscape package.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90670
Alexey Rusakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Kitsune-Ral at users dot sf.net
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739
--- Comment #17 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> Fixed (Honza, hope you don't mind the backports I've done, did that so that it
> is on time for 10.4).
Thanks. I don't mind: I was planning to do them this week anyway and
also extra VOLAT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106019
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106022
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106022
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> SLP thinks that it needs 4 stores to store 4 bytes of integer constant.
> But it takes only 1 4-byte store.
Yes, SLP looks at the GIMPLE IL, if you disable store-mer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106025
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106027
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106027
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue seems to be that
#4 0x00f82be3 in fold_binary_loc (loc=2147483656,
code=TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR, type=,
op0=, op1=)
at /space/rguenther/src/gcc/gcc/fold-const.cc:12044
/*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106033
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Deobfuscated:
int a, b, c;
char
foo (int x, int y)
{
return x * y;
}
void
bar (void)
{
char d = (foo <= b) * a;
c = foo (2 != bar, d);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106022
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> We already put the const_vector into the constant pool at RTL expansion time,
> possibly because the move patterns do not allow vector constants fitting into
> {S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105940
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86882d9feb6a534325d7162216696266898e36d0
commit r13-1173-g86882d9feb6a534325d7162216696266898e36d0
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Mon Jun 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105956
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
And I reduced to the pretty same code snippet as Marek did.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106027
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:713f2fd923442b1be620a44240ddf786ae0ab476
commit r13-1174-g713f2fd923442b1be620a44240ddf786ae0ab476
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106027
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
Known to fail|13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106022
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 53169
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53169&action=edit
A patch
This patch multiplies the vector store cost by the number of scalar elements in
a word to properly compare s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
--- Comment #4 from Alex Coplan ---
Started with r13-673-gd863ba23fb16122bb0547b0c678173be0d98f43c :
commit d863ba23fb16122bb0547b0c678173be0d98f43c
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu May 19 17:54:38 2022 +0100
PR middle-end/98865: Expand X*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|ice in emit_move_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Still it is latent on the release branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
Around 22,000 executions of csmith per 24 hours and feeding the results
to trunk gcc are proving their value in flushing out bugs in gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This one seems to be very old:
__attribute__((noipa, noinline, noclone)) int
foo (int x, int *y)
{
int a = 0;
if (x < 0)
a = *y;
return a;
}
int
main ()
{
int a = 42;
if (foo (0, 0) != 0 ||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105960
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe9765c0b97e6b4ce2cd226631d329fc05ba2aa5
commit r13-1180-gfe9765c0b97e6b4ce2cd226631d329fc05ba2aa5
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Jun 14 08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106022
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 53171
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53171&action=edit
The v2 patch
Handle vector store.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106019
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105835
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106034
Bug ID: 106034
Summary: internal compiler error: in type_node, at
cp/module.cc:8736 using --with-long-double-format=ieee
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69200
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106035
Bug ID: 106035
Summary: F2018 allows an IMPORT statement within the BLOCK
construct.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106033
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Created attachment 53173
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53173&action=edit
Potential patch
I haven't been able to recreate the problem, but does this patch fix it?
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105970
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ddc9b963ab9f267e8cc54be1fa6fcca2e8b0eb84
commit r12-8498-gddc9b963ab9f267e8cc54be1fa6fcca2e8b0eb84
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106034
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There are some more errors further along in the test case that appear related:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-ieee-bootstrap/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++
-B/home/seurer/gcc/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106016
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #10 from Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105209
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8fc8a6ff7a6996fb7f12338c45d1c3450b7a397
commit r12-8499-gf8fc8a6ff7a6996fb7f12338c45d1c3450b7a397
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105954
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106029
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106029
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105970
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84fe5ace4734cb0eeb342114e744455a7178b0e2
commit r11-10082-g84fe5ace4734cb0eeb342114e744455a7178b0e2
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104829
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Sebastian Huber
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58465d673bb21fc234f642166ec0cf9e621787c3
commit r10-10859-g58465d673bb21fc234f642166ec0cf9e621787c3
Author: Segher Boes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885
Pavel M changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pavel.morozkin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33547
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j at uriah dot heep.sax.de
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45184
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 3885 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alt...@arts-union.ru
--- Comment #17 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105970
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:570a6067ff6928fe76bb13cece38346d9a966a13
commit r10-10860-g570a6067ff6928fe76bb13cece38346d9a966a13
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105970
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104829
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Sebastian Huber
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d87e0e297b1cba73a0c055d2a3e9267d288f435a
commit r11-10084-gd87e0e297b1cba73a0c055d2a3e9267d288f435a
Author: Segher Boes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105209
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:380829dfd9d8a602322a7771f94616056ebbde21
commit r11-10085-g380829dfd9d8a602322a7771f94616056ebbde21
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105209
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94cf9bfb4d269fa5a4e3eeda45f4eafe392bfd58
commit r10-10861-g94cf9bfb4d269fa5a4e3eeda45f4eafe392bfd58
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105209
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105908
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105964
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106036
Bug ID: 106036
Summary: Missing stdint.h include in libgcc/libgcov.h
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106037
Bug ID: 106037
Summary: ICE with Aggregate aspect
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106034
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98645
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on missing template |[11/12/13 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106038
Bug ID: 106038
Summary: x86_64 vectorization of ALU ops using xmm registers
prematurely
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106038
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 53175
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53175&action=edit
Testcase -O3 -march=icelake-client
Next time attach the testcase and not link to godbolt without a testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106038
--- Comment #2 from Noah Goldstein ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Created attachment 53175 [details]
> Testcase -O3 -march=icelake-client
>
> Next time attach the testcase and not link to godbolt without a testcase.
Sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105999
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang prints x also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105999
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105999
--- Comment #3 from Egor Pugin ---
See ms response
https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/C-Wrong-requires-result-inside-lambd/10073268#T-N10075675
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106039
Bug ID: 106039
Summary: Inconsistent error reporting for printf() when format
string is a macro
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106039
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Leffler ---
Created attachment 53177
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53177&action=edit
Close to minimal source (4 format strings; 4 printf statements; some comments)
Close to minimal source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106039
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Leffler ---
Created attachment 53178
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53178&action=edit
Output from gcc -v when compiling the test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106039
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't see an issue with the diagnostic here really.
For the single line case (without the format as a macro):
printf("%-21s %-16x %-16x %-18s %-18s\n", "GHI", (intptr_t) val1,
(intptr_t) val1, "ABC",
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106040
Bug ID: 106040
Summary: gcc reports error in aggregate when member has
explicit constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106040
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0, 11.1.0, 12.1.0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106040
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105989
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106038
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105990
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105978
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo