[Bug libobjc/48626] --enable-objc-gc should be automatic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48626 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4) > > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3) > > detecting things > > automatically instead of requiring additio

[Bug other/82383] Some new toplevel directories are not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82383 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug tree-optimization/105651] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 --- Comment #4 from James McKelvey --- Still fails with gcc-12-20220521 and gcc-13-20220522, but not gcc-11-20220520.

[Bug target/104816] -fcf-protection=branch should generate endbr instead of notrack jumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104816 --- Comment #12 from peterz at infradead dot org --- On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 04:06:08PM +, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104816 > > --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- > The master bran

[Bug libstdc++/105722] New: [10 regression] std/ranges/adaptors/elements.cc fails after r10-10724-g93ec7bf2253061

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105722 Bug ID: 105722 Summary: [10 regression] std/ranges/adaptors/elements.cc fails after r10-10724-g93ec7bf2253061 Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/103608] ICE in do_intent, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:3035

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103608 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-05-24 Priority

[Bug target/101891] Adjust -fzero-call-used-regs to always use XOR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101891 --- Comment #8 from Qing Zhao --- > On May 24, 2022, at 11:42 AM, arjan at linux dot intel.com > wrote: > > --- Comment #7 from Arjan van de Ven --- > from a performance angle, the xor-only sequence is not so great at all; modern > CPUs are

[Bug tree-optimization/104964] Wrong *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated - acl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104964 --- Comment #19 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #18) > Thanks. I reported the Qt issue upstream at > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-103782. Note the Qt6 code is fine (uses reinterpret_cast(this)) and it's what w

[Bug target/101891] Adjust -fzero-call-used-regs to always use XOR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101891 --- Comment #9 from Arjan van de Ven --- I don't have recent measurements since we did this work quite some time ago. basically on the CPU level (speaking for Intel style cpus at least), a CPU can eliminate (meaning: no execution resources used

[Bug target/105719] RFE: fixincludes should handle Frameworks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug fortran/104630] module subroutine not accessible from submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104630 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/105622] [13 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_store_expression with [[no_unique_address]] since r13-160-g967cdbe6629653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105622 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2540e2c604142889308857657d3510874955336a commit r13-746-g2540e2c604142889308857657d3510874955336a Author: Jason Merrill Date: Fr

[Bug c++/105622] [13 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_store_expression with [[no_unique_address]] since r13-160-g967cdbe6629653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105622 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/105623] [12/13 regression][rejects valid] invalid use of auto when deducing return type of base class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105623 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/105723] New: Optimization false positive warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105723 Bug ID: 105723 Summary: Optimization false positive warning Product: gcc Version: 12.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/105604] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: in tree_to_shwi with vla in struct and sprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105604 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10d1986aee47c592f903527bb68546efc557735d commit r13-750-g10d1986aee47c592f903527bb68546efc557735d Author: Martin Sebor Date: Tue

[Bug middle-end/105604] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: in tree_to_shwi with vla in struct and sprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105604 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE:

[Bug testsuite/105724] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr105140.c fails after r11-10012-g740d64815c6c8a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105724 Bug ID: 105724 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr105140.c fails after r11-10012-g740d64815c6c8a Product: gcc Version: 11.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c++/53281] poor error message for calling a non-const method from a const object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281 Barry Revzin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/90835] Incompatibilities with macOS 10.15 headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835 --- Comment #32 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #26) > That's one option, certainly easier for the users. At the least, the > issue should be documented in install.texi so they can add > --with-sysr

[Bug other/37036] fixincludes does not understand sysroot!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37036 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jay from comment #4) > Here is a lame workaround that works, from my Python wrapper: > > if (Host == Target) and (Host != Build): > ExtraConfig += " -with-sysroot=/" > ExtraC

[Bug other/37036] fixincludes does not understand sysroot!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37036 --- Comment #6 from jayk123 at hotmail dot com --- I'm sorry the Python is surely very long gone. It was so many years ago. It was a wrapper around a series of configure + make to build several gcc toolsets, i.e. native, cross, etc. At the time

[Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point (configure should reject --enable-fixed-point on platforms that don't support it)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2008-01-22 00:58:46 |2022-5-24 CC|

[Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point (configure should reject --enable-fixed-point on platforms that don't support it)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422 --- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager --- Current code is like this: # Enable C extension for fixed-point arithmetic. AC_ARG_ENABLE(fixed-point, [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-fixed-point], [enable fixed-point arithmetic extension to C])

[Bug c++/105725] New: [ICE] segfault with `-Wmismatched-tags`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105725 Bug ID: 105725 Summary: [ICE] segfault with `-Wmismatched-tags` Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/105726] New: spurious warning with -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105726 Bug ID: 105726 Summary: spurious warning with -Warray-bounds Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug testsuite/105724] [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr105140.c fails after r11-10012-g740d64815c6c8a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105724 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/105147] New test case gcc.dg/pr105140.c introduced in r12-7979-geaaf77dd85c333 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105147 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69100fb86ff48926e5db5920a9c8cdba5ff111bd commit r11-10031-g69100fb86ff48926e5db5920a9c8cdba5ff111bd Author: Segher Boesse

[Bug target/105147] New test case gcc.dg/pr105140.c introduced in r12-7979-geaaf77dd85c333 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105147 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29902934b4894280cfd5acc1765834f7392a4d48 commit r11-10032-g29902934b4894280cfd5acc1765834f7392a4d48 Author: Andreas Krebb

[Bug testsuite/105724] [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr105140.c fails after r11-10012-g740d64815c6c8a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105724 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/105147] New test case gcc.dg/pr105140.c introduced in r12-7979-geaaf77dd85c333 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105147 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 105724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/77882] [Aarch64] Add 'naked' function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i at maskray dot me --- Comment #11 from

[Bug target/77882] [Aarch64] Add 'naked' function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #11) > The number of targets supporting this attribute is large but the popular > aarch64 somehow doesn't support it... I just run into a case where > supporting this w

[Bug ipa/105625] Support .llvm_addrsig section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105625 --- Comment #7 from Tatsuyuki Ishi --- https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-May/121000.html I just posted an initial revision of the patchset for gas.

<    1   2