https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105648
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
> Please tell me if I am needed to try and squeeze more out, although I'm
> likely to need instructions given aforementioned.
No, I've just sent a patch to mailing list that's going to fix it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105652
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
More reduced.
template
concept C = [] { return true; } ();
template // <-- ok if not 'T'
struct S {};
template
requires C
struct S { constexpr static bool value = true; };
static_assert(S::value);
https://godbo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105627
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102774
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For the first case:
template void f(T...) { }
GCC prints:
f.C:1:18: error: expected nested-name-specifier before ‘.’ token
1 | template void f(T...) { }
| ^
f.C:1:18: error: e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102774
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For Barry's example clang prints:
g.C:5:8: error: use of undeclared identifier 'B'; did you mean 'A::B'?
void f(B::X x, int j) {
^
A::B
g.C:1:14: note: 'A::B' declared here
namespace A::B {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52988|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105655
Bug ID: 105655
Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE on invalid deduction
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
--- Comment #13 from Hongtao.liu ---
> so for the situation at hand I don't see any reasonable way out that
> doesn't have the chance of regressing things in other places (like
> treat loads from non-indexed auto variables specially or so). Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105656
Bug ID: 105656
Summary: remove BROKEN_VALUE_INITIALIZATION workaround
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105652
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105655
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105656
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643
--- Comment #4 from Levy Hsu ---
Created attachment 52995
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52995&action=edit
-fopt-info-vec before that commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643
--- Comment #5 from Levy Hsu ---
Created attachment 52996
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52996&action=edit
-fopt-info-vec after this commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105650
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643
--- Comment #6 from Levy Hsu ---
Created attachment 52997
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52997&action=edit
Vec different seems to related SetPixelPacket
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105650
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105657
Bug ID: 105657
Summary: Build failure in firefox libxul.so if
-DGLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS is in my CXXFLAGS
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105658
Bug ID: 105658
Summary: Passing array component to unlimited polymorphic
routine passes wrong slice
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105657
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That symbol is in libstdc++.so.6.0.30 so I assume you're linking to the wrong
libstdc++.so, which is probably caused by -L/usr/lib/../lib
Try adding -Wl,--trace to the g++ linker command and see which lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105657
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105507
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
> We currently link:
>
> shared: gmp, winpthread, zlib, zstd
> static: mpc, mpfr, isl
>
> Not for any particular gcc related reason I think, some dependent packages
> have static/shared builds, some don't.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105635
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b4daa0b3c3d8eb2ac3b40ad6898f314ed4d7919
commit r13-630-g3b4daa0b3c3d8eb2ac3b40ad6898f314ed4d7919
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105630
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:213cfa8d0a9d0bb28bd973323ee2055ee6699d86
commit r13-631-g213cfa8d0a9d0bb28bd973323ee2055ee6699d86
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105635
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE in |[12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105630
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105656
--- Comment #2 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
Yes, i've seen your bigger patch to remove all of these version conditionals.
But please note that this BROKEN_VALUE_INITIALIZATION was explicitly taylored
to catch aforementioned GCC versions, a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
It seems there are a lot of loops like the following in FrameImage
for (x=0; x < (ssize_t) width; x++)
{
SetPixelPacket(frame_image,&matte,q,frame_indexes);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105655
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105650
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105654
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105654
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
FWIW, glibc has removed the use of transparent_union from its wait
implementation long ago.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100413
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a03b46b78c82666b39ccada3df533f819e13dcb7
commit r11-10011-ga03b46b78c82666b39ccada3df533f819e13dcb7
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100413
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
Bug ID: 105659
Summary: error: #error You must define PREFERRED_DEBUGGING_TYPE
if DWARF is not supported
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105654
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
The declaration with the transparent union allows redeclarations with either of
the contained types.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105660
Bug ID: 105660
Summary: ICE on aarch64 in warn_parm_array_mismatch
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586
Surya Kumari Jangala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jskumari at gcc dot
gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105431
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e43783b3f3570f59bbe80fe38ba65049fa77a0a
commit r12-8396-g1e43783b3f3570f59bbe80fe38ba65049fa77a0a
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105537
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a53eff4ad05f234a509dd2995d5a7612d5baa4e8
commit r12-8398-ga53eff4ad05f234a509dd2995d5a7612d5baa4e8
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105559
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a040e982945a5795081e81be35094b604d596d3
commit r12-8399-g2a040e982945a5795081e81be35094b604d596d3
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:844a5c8ca768dc0cc90c1a943756610832d686a8
commit r12-8400-g844a5c8ca768dc0cc90c1a943756610832d686a8
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b251f8be6b018966edad5daeb45c42fd193b24b4
commit r12-8401-gb251f8be6b018966edad5daeb45c42fd193b24b4
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2022
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25d7a7381099b46b6554c5e20b00b19d460c2123
commit r12-8402-g25d7a7381099b46b6554c5e20b00b19d460c2123
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25d7a7381099b46b6554c5e20b00b19d460c2123
commit r12-8402-g25d7a7381099b46b6554c5e20b00b19d460c2123
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105618
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:374cee99d01fceb89d0929da8b38051e6c9768f0
commit r12-8403-g374cee99d01fceb89d0929da8b38051e6c9768f0
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.1.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105537
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105661
Bug ID: 105661
Summary: Comparisons to atomic variables generates less
efficient code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105647
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Giuliano Belinassi
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16e02662c092c6e3087628ef0030e7daa2f71485
commit r13-633-g16e02662c092c6e3087628ef0030e7daa2f71485
Author: Giuliano Belinassi
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105657
--- Comment #2 from Ken Moffat ---
Jonathan,
many thinks for your time and and explanation. It seems that when the desired
version of gcc is in /opt/gcc, the mach build system used by firefox needs
LDFLAGS=" -L/opt/gcc/lib" - that allowed it to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105648
--- Comment #3 from Giuliano Belinassi ---
Not sure if duplicate, but it certainly is related to PR99888 and PR98125.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105649
--- Comment #2 from Giuliano Belinassi ---
This issue is related to PR98125.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105657
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105140
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:740d64815c6c8afff5e92fff0f5e9e600361ff75
commit r11-10012-g740d64815c6c8afff5e92fff0f5e9e600361ff75
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105250
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0be87cc23d0b0e07656e94137978971555bebbb3
commit r11-10013-g0be87cc23d0b0e07656e94137978971555bebbb3
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64b3a86d33e08072ea78f2a87c8a275bd15f07cb
commit r11-10014-g64b3a86d33e08072ea78f2a87c8a275bd15f07cb
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105163
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:132c3bb06a90887f5c173e00b7f2c5163e054ac1
commit r11-10015-g132c3bb06a90887f5c173e00b7f2c5163e054ac1
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105173
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4f2bd4edea8beabcf9caea98f951dcac612b126
commit r11-10016-gf4f2bd4edea8beabcf9caea98f951dcac612b126
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105263
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2557f9081e5bf440abe3fc184cbdaea0447ec64
commit r11-10017-gb2557f9081e5bf440abe3fc184cbdaea0447ec64
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105312
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33914983cf3734c2f8079963ba49fcc117499ef3
commit r11-10018-g33914983cf3734c2f8079963ba49fcc117499ef3
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105368
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e6ae76385c60ad1ef63270ba969729a40ca1245
commit r11-10019-g3e6ae76385c60ad1ef63270ba969729a40ca1245
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105431
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16a2fcfe247364088ca9d6d058d870bdfa28b345
commit r11-10020-g16a2fcfe247364088ca9d6d058d870bdfa28b345
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105559
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d293946d5c318549af88f96c4c2175dcbb8f4cf1
commit r11-10021-gd293946d5c318549af88f96c4c2175dcbb8f4cf1
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105312
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|12.0|11.3.0, 12.1.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105573
Bug 105573 depends on bug 105312, which changed state.
Bug 105312 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr on
arm-linux since r12-834-ga6eacbf1055520
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105312
What|Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105632
--- Comment #1 from Lance Fredrickson ---
Created attachment 52999
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52999&action=edit
Avoids using poisoned malloc in libcc1
Adds to libcc1plugin.cc and libcp1plugin.cc
#define INCLUDE_MEMORY
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105660
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105660
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105660
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105659
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
If I recall the conversation correctly, either the CPU-specific D language
hooks should be moved to macros - equivalent to TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS and
others. Or the tm_d file should be packed with a lot more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105662
Bug ID: 105662
Summary: [RFC][OpenMP][OpenMP] - permit disabling host-fallback
mode?
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
Bug ID: 105663
Summary: Segmentation Fault on optimization level O2/O3
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105507
--- Comment #9 from Christoph Reiter ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8)
> > We currently link:
> >
> > shared: gmp, winpthread, zlib, zstd
> > static: mpc, mpfr, isl
> >
> > Not for any particular gcc related reason I think, some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm:
_13 = pQList_4(D) | pNewNode_6(D);
_14 = (long unsigned int) _13;
That should be invalid gimple also ...
This might be my bug introduced by r12-5358-g32221357007666 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod ---
Or perhaps there shouldnt be
set (BIT_NOT_EXPR, op_bitwise_not);
set (BIT_XOR_EXPR, op_bitwise_xor);
operations on pointer values? I see also support
set (BIT_AND_EXPR, op_pointer_and);
set (BIT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
Bug ID: 105664
Summary: Install with suffix creates extra file
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
quot; ]; then \
rm -f
/private/tmp/gcc-20220519-78662-28g74h/gcc-11.3.0/build/../instdir/opt/homebrew/opt/gcc/bin/aarch64-apple-darwin21-gcc-11;
\
( cd
/private/tmp/gcc-20220519-78662-28g74h/gcc-11.3.0/build/../instdir/opt/homebrew/opt/gcc/bin
&& \
l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
install-driver: installdirs xgcc$(exeext)
-rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$(GCC_INSTALL_NAME)$(exeext)
-$(INSTALL_PROGRAM) xgcc$(exeext)
$(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$(GCC_INSTALL_NAME)$(exeext)
-i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604599/utilities/mv.html
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604599/functions/rename.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
1. I've reproduced it on x86_64-linux, so it's not a weird macOS mv bug
2. I have reasons to think (no hard proof, though) that it's a new bug: we're
hitting it during Homebrew testing, but it was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105507
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I'm wondering if there are any downsides to just removing "-static-libgcc"
> from both "--with-stage1-ldflags" and "--with-boot-ldflags".
None presumably, since you already have dependencies on DLLs.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98865
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d863ba23fb16122bb0547b0c678173be0d98f43c
commit r13-673-gd863ba23fb16122bb0547b0c678173be0d98f43c
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
I can reproduce it with various combinations of configure options, with and
without bootstrap. It appears that the triggering factor is the combination of
two options:
--with-gcc-major-version-onl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105636
--- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat ---
Thank you for reporting this. I can reproduce it, nice and easy :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
Perhaps the macos mv has recently been upgraded to POSIX.1-2018. Step 2 of the
mv operation didn't exist in the 2004 edition.
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 13.0.0 20220519 (experimental) [master r13-673-gd863ba23fb1] (GCC)
[600] %
[600] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
[601] %
[601] % gcctk -Os small.c
[602] % ./a.out
Segmentation fault
[603] %
[603] % cat small.c
int a, b, c[1], d[2], *e = c;
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105665
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
Compiler Explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/jsT5Evv54
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105665
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-19
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105663
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE |[11/12/13 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105664
--- Comment #7 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
So, to summarise my understanding:
- the problem is not specific to darwin, I can fully reproduce on
x86_64-linux-gnu
- the problem only arises if you configure with a --program-suffix that is
eq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105665
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102059
--- Comment #41 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ea6d0ed6860e4f1d8f609c26de9d9a7f7a9ad2d
commit r11-10022-g3ea6d0ed6860e4f1d8f609c26de9d9a7f7a9ad2d
Author: Michael Meiss
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
