https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105527
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105544
--- Comment #6 from Fabian Vogt ---
I had a quick debugging session: The DMD lexer code doesn't really care about
the size of the buffer and instead runs until it encounters either a 0 or 0x1A
byte. The stdin read loop in d_parse_file doesn't ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105544
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Seen by valgrind:
==23477== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==23477==at 0x159B539: Lexer::scan(Token*) (lexer.c:267)
==23477==by 0x15CE1F3: UnknownInlinedFun (lexer.c:161)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105572
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105574
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.1.0, 13.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
Bug ID: 105577
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in delete_unmarked_insns, at
dce.cc:653
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
Curdeius Curdeius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||curdeius at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #2 from Curdeius Curdeius ---
Created attachment 52966
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52966&action=edit
Preprocessed source of the minimal reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97309
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this is still unclear.
What does "new data races" mean? Can it introduce races in code that had none
previously? Or only add new ones to code that already has them?
Does this make -Ofast incompati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105578
Bug ID: 105578
Summary: `constexpr` does not work on powerpc
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105575
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97309
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> If all accesses to a variable use atomic ops, does that mean it's immune
> from the unsafe optimizations enabled by this flag? If no, that makes -Ofast
> unus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105579
Bug ID: 105579
Summary: make check failed
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105578
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19779
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liushuyu011 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |rtl-optimization
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105544
--- Comment #8 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #6)
> I had a quick debugging session: The DMD lexer code doesn't really care
> about the size of the buffer and instead runs until it encounters either a 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105572
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
This should be reported to binutils and closed as moved since this is not a gcc
bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Perhaps with -fno-strict-aliasing we think the store to *this might alias with
it? Though, that shouldn't be about TBAA but simple points-to analysis, where
obviously this as function argument can't point t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104371
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hongyu Wang :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c9364f29e7e47eb9de33f2d8843d5b00284ceca
commit r13-338-g3c9364f29e7e47eb9de33f2d8843d5b00284ceca
Author: Haochen Jiang
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105579
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lidehua5 at huawei dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105580
Bug ID: 105580
Summary: False warning "potential null pointer dereference"
raised when using istreambuf_iterator and any "-O"
flag
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105544
--- Comment #9 from Fabian Vogt ---
(In reply to ibuclaw from comment #8)
> (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #6)
> > I had a quick debugging session: The DMD lexer code doesn't really care
> > about the size of the buffer and instead runs u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104371
--- Comment #8 from Haochen Jiang ---
Fixed for GCC 13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #4 from Curdeius Curdeius ---
Created attachment 52967
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52967&action=edit
A slightly reduced case
A bit more reduced reproducer.
Not sure it helps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Perhaps with -fno-strict-aliasing we think the store to *this might alias
> with it? Though, that shouldn't be about TBAA but simple points-to
> analysis, whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc
index d4d0aba880c..9f7f12846cb 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc
@@ -2593,6 +2593,11 @@ vn_reference_lookup_3 (ao_ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105581
Bug ID: 105581
Summary: boolean types and relational operators problem
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Curdeius Curdeius from comment #4)
> Created attachment 52967 [details]
> A slightly reduced case
>
> A bit more reduced reproducer.
> Not sure it helps.
No, we would need a pre-processed sourc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105578
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to shuyu liu from comment #0)
> `constexpr` does not work on PowerPC when you use `-mabi=ibmlongdouble`.
That's a pretty bold claim! **Some** long double arithmetic does not work in
constant exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE in |[12/13 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105581
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Well. There is a meaning for the code though.
That is negative > other_negative
Means negative is true while other_negative is false the result will be true
which is exactly what it is testing here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> With -fdelete-dead-exceptions, it started with r12-248-gb58dc0b803057c0e.
> The reduction is pretty slow..
That just exposed the issue I think since the failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105581
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
Equivalent to negative && !other_negative.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94b8a37fa16f7638cc1965718f4ec71719506743
commit r13-340-g94b8a37fa16f7638cc1965718f4ec71719506743
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.1.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105572
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I bisected that and it's fixed in master (not present in any release branch):
commit fb0e49d8e05e61ca2af9b5f60b01ad5fb6d274ff
Author: Alan Modra
Date: Tue Mar 8 22:48:51 2022 +1030
Constant fold view
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105572
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105573
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105312
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 105573 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105581
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Well. There is a meaning for the code though.
> That is negative > other_negative
> Means negative is true while other_negative is false the result will be tru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> > With -fdelete-dead-exceptions, it started with r12-248-gb58dc0b803057c0e.
> > The reduction is pretty slow..
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105581
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
There is nothing abstractly wrong with ordering false and true.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105582
Bug ID: 105582
Summary: ICE on procedure pointer assignment inside block
Product: gcc
Version: og11 (devel/omp/gcc-11)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.4 |10.4
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105544
--- Comment #10 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #9)
> (In reply to ibuclaw from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #6)
> > > I had a quick debugging session: The DMD lexer code doesn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105580
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfda40f8147412328f699628a54b0aaa584776e7
commit r13-373-gdfda40f8147412328f699628a54b0aaa584776e7
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105583
Bug ID: 105583
Summary: Syntax error when alias template in requires-clause
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.5 |11.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105544
--- Comment #11 from Fabian Vogt ---
(In reply to ibuclaw from comment #10)
> (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #9)
> > (In reply to ibuclaw from comment #8)
> > > (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #6)
> > > > I had a quick debugging ses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105583
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
It may be a duplicate of PR102881 since decltype lambda is also used.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105411
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley ---
> I've added TEST_ALWAYS_FLAGS to the gcc/testsuite/lib/gm2.exp as per other
> tests.
Looks good now. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104862
Alvin Wong changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
There's a reduced test case, can you please include it in testsuite?
namespace {
typedef long size_t;
}
typedef char uint8_t;
typedef long uint64_t;
namespace {
template struct integral_constant {
stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104017
--- Comment #6 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes ---
This is from a report I made in private to Martin, for GCC12.
That tidbit seems to have been lost in the bug creation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104862
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105545
Ed Catmur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ed at catmur dot uk
--- Comment #3 from Ed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105573
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
1. Could you consider the fix for backporting please to 11? It works for me
as-is.
2. Will the testcase be committed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105545
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes ---
You don't need -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS in C++20 mode but you do in C++17 mode it
seems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105545
--- Comment #5 from Tom Hughes ---
On top of -O1 you seem to need all of -fexpensive-optimizations -ftree-vrp
-fipa-sra to trigger it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105584
Bug ID: 105584
Summary: libcxx needs using_if_exist attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105584
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
[clang] Implement the using_if_exists attribute
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/369c64839946d89cf5697550b6feeea031b2f270
This shows how the attribute works. Hope GCC could add it.
Also probably ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105584
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-June/066038.html
According to the proposal, it looks like this attribute could benefit libstdc++
too since I do see similar issues before.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105585
Bug ID: 105585
Summary: [12/13 Regression] Spurious stringop-overflow warning
with
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105585
--- Comment #1 from Ed Catmur ---
Flags: -O1 -Wstringop-overflow=1
https://godbolt.org/z/8r8roz7Pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105585
--- Comment #2 from Ed Catmur ---
Affected code: https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/issues/1175
The proposed patch to abseil-cpp corresponds to adding an assumption that `b`
is true above.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105584
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #3 from Jonat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17632
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0080f0285dfa9b7f0b7a6c5ec79e28eb662b953
commit r13-375-ga0080f0285dfa9b7f0b7a6c5ec79e28eb662b953
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586
Bug ID: 105586
Summary: [11/12/13 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)
with -O2 -fno-if-conversion -mtune=power4
-fno-guess-branch-probability
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5296b77556da4682d5a1e2318c0643affaa00563
commit r11-9981-g5296b77556da4682d5a1e2318c0643affaa00563
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102071
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:394c852a6b4bed8117c790c2cd1553e224975ad5
commit r11-9982-g394c852a6b4bed8117c790c2cd1553e224975ad5
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104669
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c45820ead85b8bc6f8283f7692a85d0c12ded4f
commit r11-9983-g0c45820ead85b8bc6f8283f7692a85d0c12ded4f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100111
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe81f5bd3c3e764d1355eda3e44e37cec99cd23c
commit r11-9984-gfe81f5bd3c3e764d1355eda3e44e37cec99cd23c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105245
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe81f5bd3c3e764d1355eda3e44e37cec99cd23c
commit r11-9984-gfe81f5bd3c3e764d1355eda3e44e37cec99cd23c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:728f97cf0431ff342beceea4f91afa1707133248
commit r11-9985-g728f97cf0431ff342beceea4f91afa1707133248
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105265
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:728f97cf0431ff342beceea4f91afa1707133248
commit r11-9985-g728f97cf0431ff342beceea4f91afa1707133248
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82980
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc8739c2ab14f0108e4fabbd565fa0918e4425ee
commit r11-9986-gdc8739c2ab14f0108e4fabbd565fa0918e4425ee
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104646
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a67bc6320d34b20fe838d479a6a1e110f1160c89
commit r11-9987-ga67bc6320d34b20fe838d479a6a1e110f1160c89
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102629
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0484f60e6409ef6e837e4712d212a5d827767ba
commit r11-9988-gf0484f60e6409ef6e837e4712d212a5d827767ba
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104669
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97246
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|10.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98717
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101767
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:846bff4d4659d9b2026da574194599f38a00cc79
commit r10-10718-g846bff4d4659d9b2026da574194599f38a00cc79
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98249
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c69f7c449cc1c0d48e13b8680023a59f541260e
commit r10-10719-g6c69f7c449cc1c0d48e13b8680023a59f541260e
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100608
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b01044ec7fbed24e9394bcf49e524acdd52849e7
commit r10-10720-gb01044ec7fbed24e9394bcf49e524acdd52849e7
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101717
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20dc7a2119cc0a4e5ddc4a6899a7350621f05440
commit r10-10721-g20dc7a2119cc0a4e5ddc4a6899a7350621f05440
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100111
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c7905a9f10d28dfd27ddf21d3bf38a3e261ee10
commit r10-10722-g6c7905a9f10d28dfd27ddf21d3bf38a3e261ee10
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105245
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c7905a9f10d28dfd27ddf21d3bf38a3e261ee10
commit r10-10722-g6c7905a9f10d28dfd27ddf21d3bf38a3e261ee10
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59950
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:080e737a851d57697d0aac55749296c5c454c421
commit r10-10723-g080e737a851d57697d0aac55749296c5c454c421
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102629
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93ec7bf22530610ef697fd3a64a28bebd589c790
commit r10-10724-g93ec7bf22530610ef697fd3a64a28bebd589c790
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104646
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d939233ef460133e012d8f40f9d8c8fcb73bb7b8
commit r10-10725-gd939233ef460133e012d8f40f9d8c8fcb73bb7b8
Author: Jason Merrill
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
