https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105446
Bug ID: 105446
Summary: [modules] Partitions: Segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105447
Bug ID: 105447
Summary: load introduction when reading an adjacent variable
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105446
--- Comment #1 from KL ---
gcc-12.1.0-RC-20220429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75bbc3da3e5f75f683fa33e309045c582efd20eb
commit r13-60-g75bbc3da3e5f75f683fa33e309045c582efd20eb
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105373
--- Comment #14 from Avi Kivity ---
Do you confirm that my observation about the generated gimple corresponds to
the bug?
If so, is there a central point where this anonymous variables are named?
Perhaps we can breakpoint on D.2741 and see wher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105448
Bug ID: 105448
Summary: load introduced when passing a struct as argument
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71176
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofoify at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105351
--- Comment #4 from Gawain Bolton ---
I am confused as to how the requirement expression be valid and yet not be
evaluated.
This is also not consistent with how the requirement check is done for
functions.
Finally, this also begs the question
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449
Bug ID: 105449
Summary: suspicious optimization since GCC 10.1.0 from -
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449
--- Comment #1 from Gilles Gouaillardet
---
Created attachment 52916
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52916&action=edit
a simple reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449
Gilles Gouaillardet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gilles.gouaillardet at gmail
dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449
--- Comment #4 from Gilles Gouaillardet
---
Thanks for the clarification!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105450
Bug ID: 105450
Summary: get_time %y reads more than 2 digits (and differ from
strptime)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105450
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fsb4000 at yandex dot ru
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105435
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|diagnostic |
Summary|Wtautological-const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, the above is GCC 12 behavior, in 11.x and earlier it has been indeed
broken and %y and %C were aliases to %Y.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105435
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105438
--- Comment #2 from Bernie Innocenti ---
GCC 12.0.1 20220413 (Red Hat 12.0.1-0) gives a more helpful diagnostic with
inlining backtrace:
In function ‘void configure(const int (&)[N], int) [with int N = 7]’,
inlined from ‘void configure(cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105438
--- Comment #3 from Bernie Innocenti ---
Not sure if this is helpful, but the IPA dump also shows two calls to
configure() with N=7 and none with N=2:
IPA function summary for int main()/3 inlinable
global time: 26.00
self size:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105438
--- Comment #4 from Bernie Innocenti ---
Furthermore, after the inline pass main() has a reference to the shorter array
with an annotation of int[7], which is clearly wrong:
[local count: 939524097]:
_5 = MEM[(const int[7] &)&shorter][i_4]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105436
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105437
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105438
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105444
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105438
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
Summary|Incorrect array
30 matches
Mail list logo
