https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105371
--- Comment #7 from luoxudong ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5)
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 07:51:10PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105371
> >
> > --- Comment #4 from anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105414
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-28
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105403
--- Comment #2 from liftdat at protonmail dot com ---
(In reply to Geoff Keating from comment #1)
> A PCH file is a trusted input, so this really shouldn’t happen, and there
> are surely many other ways to trigger arbitrary code execution if you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104375
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
backend has
16550(define_insn "*bmi2_bzhi_3_2"
16551 [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 "register_operand" "=r")
16552(and:SWI48
16553 (plus:SWI48
16554(ashift:SWI48 (const_int 1)
165
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105415
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105414
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105219
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f27848a5dc4d3b16cd4112bddcb59e0916eba623
commit r12-8297-gf27848a5dc4d3b16cd4112bddcb59e0916eba623
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105414
--- Comment #6 from HaoChen Gui ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> I think you want
>
> (if (!tree_expr_maybe_signaling_nan_p (@0))
> ...
>
> instead.
Thanks so much for comments. Do we have a way to return a NaN directly in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105219
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
Should be fixed - please verify on the aarch64 testcase and consider adding it
to the aarch64 specific parts of the testsuite.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105414
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sure, but you don't want to do that at least if flag_trapping_math.
Otherwise, the predicate would be tree_expr_signaling_nan_p and real_nan
function with "", 1 as the middle 2 arguments can create it. But
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105415
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105417
Bug ID: 105417
Summary: [11/12 Regression] powerpc64le-linux abilist changes
based on --with-long-double-format=
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105417
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-28
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105417
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #0)
> The removed symbols for the ieee configuration in 11.3 got fixed on the
> trunk,
That was r12-7225-g813415650235b8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105404
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103528
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e4f550a5bc588a76452941cb3fb887a20f8a6cc
commit r12-8298-g4e4f550a5bc588a76452941cb3fb887a20f8a6cc
Author: Rainer Orth
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105417
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So I think we want that backported to 11.4. And I think we just should export
the other symbols with the 3.4.29 version, adding 3.4.30 aliases for those
wouldn't improve things.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96850
Paul Fee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.f.fee at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96850
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michel at lebihan dot pl
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105405
--- Comment #4 from Li Shaohua ---
@Jakub, I agree with you that the above test case may access too far from the
red zone. However, for the below test case, I cannot figure out why -O0 again
did not report anything. As a user, I would think that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105405
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105418
Bug ID: 105418
Summary: debug_tree does not support well for std::construct_at
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105418
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
--- Comment #1 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Sin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105405
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> j[5][1].h is 36 after the end of a array, that is definitely too far.
Yes. Just a small note that clang emits there a bit bigger red-zone:
=>0x801c50a0: 00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105418
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I wonder if this is because the tree is jot fully constructed yet. Nor the
scope. So this issue might not be a bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105418
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |trivial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100413
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
I proposed the aforementioned fix on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-April/593732.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105418
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Debug_tree really only works post frontend in many cases. Especially when
things like overload sets are not resolved and all. You are better just to look
at the contents of the tree itself.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105418
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-28
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104167
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105415
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105415
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Wonder about:
--- gcc/alias.cc.jj 2022-02-21 16:51:50.261232505 +0100
+++ gcc/alias.cc2022-04-28 11:57:18.940425126 +0200
@@ -2219,8 +2219,10 @@ compare_base_symbol_refs (const_rtx x_ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105419
Bug ID: 105419
Summary: [11 Regression] std::initializer_list constructor
invalid in C++20 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: reje
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105419
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
C is the cause of the problems. Changing it to just C works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105419
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103593
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||whisperity at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105331
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89dbf9a5f55e0f7565865d1b38e681ef7d76afaf
commit r12-8301-g89dbf9a5f55e0f7565865d1b38e681ef7d76afaf
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105331
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression]
|-Wma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105418
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105095
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Tamar Christina
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73ceece5363b1a06196191aa6a7254ceab5b9cf4
commit r11-9943-g73ceece5363b1a06196191aa6a7254ceab5b9cf4
Author: Tamar Christi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105095
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105415
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I've included debug printouts into the if (x_node == NULL) body before return
0;
and sort -u of the dump shows in powerpc64le-linux bootstrap so far (still
ongoing) shows:
../../gcc/fortran/decl.cc match_att
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78155
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|missing warning on invalid |missing warning on invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99950
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Option -Wchar-subscripts|Option -Wchar-subscripts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99290
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e117418fb71f508c479e0144500f4da9cc92520
commit r12-8303-g4e117418fb71f508c479e0144500f4da9cc92520
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90107
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:851031b2fcd5210b96769c440db10130478d273c
commit r12-8304-g851031b2fcd5210b96769c440db10130478d273c
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90107
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:940bf20cd337df5d044c59771a28d18bea595ec9
commit r11-9944-g940bf20cd337df5d044c59771a28d18bea595ec9
Author: Marek Polacek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90107
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103868
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9cb1f565a91e2dd57098c43593954b57c065a19b
commit r12-8307-g9cb1f565a91e2dd57098c43593954b57c065a19b
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105287
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15a176a833f23e64ad38690a678bf938227ce46f
commit r12-8308-g15a176a833f23e64ad38690a678bf938227ce46f
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105301
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6cae3bb65c873a2191613f7888fe949553a21f9e
commit r12-8309-g6cae3bb65c873a2191613f7888fe949553a21f9e
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104051
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b96274a340bc0e9bcaef9baff3a44ec2f12c3df
commit r12-8310-g7b96274a340bc0e9bcaef9baff3a44ec2f12c3df
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103868
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105287
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
so the ICE should be fixed for gcc-12, and given tracking the issues in PR
105382 this could be closed now, I'd think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105301
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE: |[11 Regression] ICE: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104051
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
fixed for gcc-12, backports TBD.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105417
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>From what I can see, the --with-long-double-format=ibm libstdc++.a has
following _M_extract_int symbols (for simplicity only listing Ij symbols,
I[lmtxy] are present/absent next to it:
compatibility-ldbl-al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105420
Bug ID: 105420
Summary: Bogus -Warray-bounds with non-compile time-constant
variable
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104717
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a570f11a2fecf23998d7fe1d5cabad62cfe5cec
commit r12-8311-g2a570f11a2fecf23998d7fe1d5cabad62cfe5cec
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105421
Bug ID: 105421
Summary: GCN offloading, raised '-mgang-private-size':
'HSA_STATUS_ERROR_MEMORY_APERTURE_VIOLATION'
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105422
Bug ID: 105422
Summary: filesystem::copy does not throw exceptions when a
subdirectory exists
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105423
Bug ID: 105423
Summary: Bogus -Werror=maybe-uninitialized with definitely
initialized variable
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105422
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99290
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@msc-ge.com
--- Comment #3 from Jo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105391
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105424
Bug ID: 105424
Summary: Bogus -Wstringop-overread with non-overread condition
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105399
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b85e79dce149df68b92ef63ca2a40ff1dfa61396
commit r12-8312-gb85e79dce149df68b92ef63ca2a40ff1dfa61396
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105399
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105373
--- Comment #8 from Avi Kivity ---
Hoping this is a duplicate of PR105287. Checking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105373
--- Comment #9 from Avi Kivity ---
I think it makes it worse, now seeing similar crashes, but earlier.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63164
--- Comment #3 from Avi Kivity ---
I have something like this:
│ 2680 future<> system_keyspace_make(distributed&
dist_db, distributed& dist_ss,
sharded& dist_gossiper, db::config& cfg) { │
│ 2681 register_virtual_tabl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63164
--- Comment #4 from Avi Kivity ---
Oops, last comment intended for a separate bug. Curse the bug list thing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105373
--- Comment #10 from Avi Kivity ---
I have something like this:
│ 2680 future<> system_keyspace_make(distributed&
dist_db, distributed& dist_ss,
sharded& dist_gossiper, db::config& cfg) { │
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
--- Comment #21 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
This issue is fixed in 12 and presumably also in version 13. So the title is
misleading.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88200
--- Comment #7 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
This has been fixed on 12 and presumably also on 13. So, the title is
misleading.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381
--- Comment #20 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
JIT definitely works with 12 on m68k again - and probably 13. So, the title is
misleading.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105287
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105425
Bug ID: 105425
Summary: ambiguous template instantiation with hana::when
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98995
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidfromonline at gmail dot
com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86193
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4332c785c8e993104a4d76d86c737b51a636aee
commit r11-9945-gc4332c785c8e993104a4d76d86c737b51a636aee
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105289
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4332c785c8e993104a4d76d86c737b51a636aee
commit r11-9945-gc4332c785c8e993104a4d76d86c737b51a636aee
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105304
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:992dd9a071c16b94a616ab7242390b6581fa6001
commit r11-9946-g992dd9a071c16b94a616ab7242390b6581fa6001
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105386
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8969d00bf16a8f4de79306010fca8f14f91c171d
commit r11-9947-g8969d00bf16a8f4de79306010fca8f14f91c171d
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105386
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105425
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105425
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105426
Bug ID: 105426
Summary: [wrong-code][regression][coroutines] range-for
temporaries are not persisted in coroutines
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105426
--- Comment #1 from Avi Kivity ---
Created attachment 52898
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52898&action=edit
reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105287
Avi Kivity changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avi at scylladb dot com
--- Comment #10 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88200
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Summary|[9/10/11/12/13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression]: |[11 Regression]: Build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105412
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87656
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #11)
> -Wold-style-definition
>
> KnR style function definitions have been deprecated for about 35 years.
+1
> Yes, there is a warning for it in gcc, but tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99290
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9821d286bce3edf1d36168f129bfc7fe99c15fc3
commit r11-9948-g9821d286bce3edf1d36168f129bfc7fe99c15fc3
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105427
Bug ID: 105427
Summary: [12 regression]
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: un
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo