[Bug target/105271] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105271 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug libgomp/105358] [12 Regression] scan* fails on targets without aligned memory allocators.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105358 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57a957cb71c004de80b0fd30c8db3cc67576e0ce commit r12-8259-g57a957cb71c004de80b0fd30c8db3cc67576e0ce Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug fortran/103662] [12 Regression] TBAA problem in Fortran FE triggering in gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103662 --- Comment #23 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22c24ba48a20a4944a50cca06449debed7d1b3f4 commit r12-8260-g22c24ba48a20a4944a50cca06449debed7d1b3f4 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/105384] compilation never (?) finishes with __builtin_yn{,f,l} at -O and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105384 --- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > The bessel functions are known to take a lot of time, there are (fixed?) > older bugreports about those and we do take some measures to speed up the > computatio

[Bug tree-optimization/105367] [12 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check (tree.h:3570) with -Ofast -mveclibabi=acml

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105367 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5face32b7f439bba283e2eeb2a50f192d605bf57 commit r12-8261-g5face32b7f439bba283e2eeb2a50f192d605bf57 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug c++/65211] [9/10/11 Regression] Type alignment lost inside templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65211 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b45ae16fffc856b5d84aeea12040dd82452cd07 commit r12-8262-g1b45ae16fffc856b5d84aeea12040dd82452cd07 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug tree-optimization/105374] [12 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2580 during GIMPLE pass: reassoc since r12-7338-g884f77b4222289510e1df9db2889b60c5df6fcda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105374 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4836ac9acd0c991a4fe1dec9438773a2c4eb5ac commit r12-8263-gd4836ac9acd0c991a4fe1dec9438773a2c4eb5ac Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug tree-optimization/105374] [12 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2580 during GIMPLE pass: reassoc since r12-7338-g884f77b4222289510e1df9db2889b60c5df6fcda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105374 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c/105346] -Wno-free-nonheap-object false positive (on Bison-generated grammar code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346 --- Comment #2 from Tim Van Holder --- Sorry, missed that update. Will see what I can do. It is a fairly large grammar; there are 8300 lines between the declaration and the free(). Not sure if that is likely to matter.

[Bug rtl-optimization/105314] [12 Regression] ifcvt regression in noce_try_store_flag_mask

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105314 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d31c678d68d7b6820a958584619ca763b0eb9c5 commit r12-8264-g7d31c678d68d7b6820a958584619ca763b0eb9c5 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug rtl-optimization/105314] [12 Regression] ifcvt regression in noce_try_store_flag_mask

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/105367] [12 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check (tree.h:3570) with -Ofast -mveclibabi=acml

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105367 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/105358] [12 Regression] scan* fails on targets without aligned memory allocators.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105358 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/105338] [12 Regression] Regression: jump or cmove generated for pattern (x ? CST : 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105338 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to denis.campredon from comment #13) > Thanks a lots. > > I have a question though: foo and bar are similar, foo produces a branchless > code whereas bar uses a jump. > > int foo(int i) { >

[Bug fortran/105381] [12 Regression] Memory-hog since r12-8230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105381 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug fortran/105379] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_compare_array_spec(): Array spec clobbered since r12-8235-gfa5cd7102da676dc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105379 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/105271] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105271 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug target/105334] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.cc:4168 (error: unable to generate reloads)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105334 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Sum

[Bug tree-optimization/102890] [12 Regression] ICE in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.c:6173 since r12-1329-gce670e4faafb296d1f1a7828d20f8c8ba4686797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102890 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/102890] [12 Regression] ICE in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.c:6173 since r12-1329-gce670e4faafb296d1f1a7828d20f8c8ba4686797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102890 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P1 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/102890] [12 Regression] ICE in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.c:6173 since r12-1329-gce670e4faafb296d1f1a7828d20f8c8ba4686797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102890 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #6 from Ri

[Bug tree-optimization/102890] [12 Regression] ICE in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.c:6173 since r12-1329-gce670e4faafb296d1f1a7828d20f8c8ba4686797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102890 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Probably a dup of the fixed PR104152.

[Bug c++/105387] New: libstdc++: with -fno-rtti, pointer type info class incorrectly matches non-pointer type info classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105387 Bug ID: 105387 Summary: libstdc++: with -fno-rtti, pointer type info class incorrectly matches non-pointer type info classes Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONF

[Bug tree-optimization/102890] [12 Regression] ICE in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.c:6173 since r12-1329-gce670e4faafb296d1f1a7828d20f8c8ba4686797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102890 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/104152] [12 Regression] ICE with -Ofast -march=armv8.2-a+sve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/105387] libstdc++: with -fno-rtti, pointer type info class incorrectly matches non-pointer type info classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105387 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Thanks for the detailed report and the fix - can you please send the fix to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org and look at https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html for prerequesites to accepting the fix?

[Bug c++/105387] libstdc++: with -fno-rtti, pointer type info class incorrectly matches non-pointer type info classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105387 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/105346] -Wno-free-nonheap-object false positive (on Bison-generated grammar code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346 --- Comment #3 from Tim Van Holder --- Created attachment 52880 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52880&action=edit testcase (redacted .ii file) Right, I managed to strip out all code I'm not allowed to share. I do seem to ha

[Bug c++/105346] -Wno-free-nonheap-object false positive (on Bison-generated grammar code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346 Tim Van Holder changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |c++ --- Comment #4 from Tim Van Holder

[Bug target/103605] [PowerPC] fmin/fmax should be inlined always with xsmindp/xsmaxdp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103605 HaoChen Gui changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/105386] [11/12 Regression] Tuple in unevaluated context is instantiated; creates reference to void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105386 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug target/105355] -msmall-data-limit= unexpectedly accepts a separate argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105355 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/105355] -msmall-data-limit= unexpectedly accepts a separate argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105355 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- > $ gcc -output-pch= pes.pch a.c --save-temps --verbose > ... > /home/marxin/bin/gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.1/cc1 > -fpreprocessed utput-pch=-a.i ... This one is actually -o utput-pch=, I shou

[Bug c++/105373] miscompile involving lambda coroutines and an object bitwise copied instead of via the copy constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105373 --- Comment #5 from Avi Kivity --- Can you confirm my suspicion about the copying of __old4 in gimple? If that's the culprit I believe I can mechanically reduce the reproducer to something easily manageable.

[Bug target/105355] -msmall-data-limit= unexpectedly accepts a separate argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105355 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug modula2/102342] gm2 testsuite failures for non-default multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102342 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley --- > Many thanks for the patch - now applied to the modula2 branch of gcc-12. Thanks. I can confirm that this worked fine on both i386-pc-solaris2.

[Bug c++/105346] -Wno-free-nonheap-object false positive (on Bison-generated grammar code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Keywords|

[Bug target/104723] [12 regression] Redundant usage of stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104723 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- The overlapping stores happen due to TARGET_OVERLAP_OP_BY_PIECES_P returning true since PR90773.

[Bug c++/105373] miscompile involving lambda coroutines and an object bitwise copied instead of via the copy constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105373 --- Comment #6 from Avi Kivity --- Some more findings: if I replace the lambda (which is not a coroutine, but is contained in a coroutine lambda) with an equivalent struct, the problem goes away, both at runtime and in terms of an __old4 copy.

[Bug middle-end/105346] -Wno-free-nonheap-object false positive (on Bison-generated grammar code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,

[Bug middle-end/105346] [11/12 Regression] -Wno-free-nonheap-object false positive (on Bison-generated grammar code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug modula2/105388] New: [12 regression] Conflicting trunc decls in mc-boot/Gdecl.c etc. on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105388 Bug ID: 105388 Summary: [12 regression] Conflicting trunc decls in mc-boot/Gdecl.c etc. on Solaris Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug modula2/105388] [12 regression] Conflicting trunc decls in mc-boot/Gdecl.c etc. on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105388 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 52881 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52881&action=edit Hacky patch

[Bug modula2/105388] [12 regression] Conflicting trunc decls in mc-boot/Gdecl.c etc. on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105388 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug middle-end/105346] [11/12 Regression] -Wno-free-nonheap-object false positive (on Bison-generated grammar code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Started with r11-5732-gdce6c58db87ebf7f4477bd3126228e73e497 The IL at -O0 -Wall looks during waccess pass like: void foo () { char * bufp; char buf[20]; : bufp_2 = &buf; if (&buf != bufp_2)

[Bug modula2/105388] [12 regression] Conflicting trunc decls in mc-boot/Gdecl.c etc. on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105388 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/105355] -msmall-data-limit= unexpectedly accepts a separate argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105355 --- Comment #3 from Alexey Izbyshev --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) Yes, "gcc test.h -o test.pch" uses the separate spelling of "--output-pch=" in cc1 command line (but, curiously, "gcc test.h" uses the joined spelling).

[Bug c++/105373] miscompile involving lambda coroutines and an object bitwise copied instead of via the copy constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105373 --- Comment #7 from Avi Kivity --- To give more context: struct ._anon_973 D.2159793 [value-expr: frame_ptr->D.2159793_4_7]; struct lw_shared_ptr D.2159792 [value-expr: frame_ptr->D.2159792_4_7]; (I determined that _anon_973 is the non

[Bug middle-end/105346] [11/12 Regression] -Wno-free-nonheap-object false positive (on Bison-generated grammar code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 26 Apr 2022, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346 > > --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Started with r11-5732-gdce6c58db87ebf7f447

[Bug middle-end/105346] [11/12 Regression] -Wno-free-nonheap-object false positive (on Bison-generated grammar code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug debug/105389] New: variable displayed as available at -O1 and -O3 but as optimized out at -Og and with an incorrect value at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105389 Bug ID: 105389 Summary: variable displayed as available at -O1 and -O3 but as optimized out at -Og and with an incorrect value at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug modula2/105390] New: [12 regression] sigfpe redeclared in mc-boot-ch/GSysExceptions.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105390 Bug ID: 105390 Summary: [12 regression] sigfpe redeclared in mc-boot-ch/GSysExceptions.c Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug modula2/105390] [12 regression] sigfpe redeclared in mc-boot-ch/GSysExceptions.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105390 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 52882 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52882&action=edit Hacky patch. I've only now noticed that the mechanical sigfpe -> sigfpe_ change shouldn't have been applied to s

[Bug modula2/105391] New: gm2 doesn't heed --with-gmp*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105391 Bug ID: 105391 Summary: gm2 doesn't heed --with-gmp* Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: modula2 A

[Bug modula2/105391] gm2 doesn't heed --with-gmp*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105391 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 52883 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52883&action=edit Hacky patch

[Bug modula2/105392] New: SEGV compiling gm2-libs-pim/BitBlockOps.mod on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105392 Bug ID: 105392 Summary: SEGV compiling gm2-libs-pim/BitBlockOps.mod on SPARC Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug testsuite/105349] [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c fails after r12-8221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105349 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad56a60f58c1ed662deaf60d5736c332ec2caabb commit r12-8265-gad56a60f58c1ed662deaf60d5736c332ec2caabb Author: Segher Boessenkool

[Bug c++/105393] New: A simple for loop becomes an infinite when -O1/2/3 used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105393 Bug ID: 105393 Summary: A simple for loop becomes an infinite when -O1/2/3 used Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/105393] A simple for loop becomes an infinite when -O1/2/3 used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105393 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/105378] [OpenMP][5.1] 'nowait' on 'taskwait' not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105378 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- @item @code{nowait} clause in @code{taskwait} directive @tab N @tab is certainly in our tables.

[Bug c++/105393] A simple for loop becomes an infinite when -O1/2/3 used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105393 Laryushin Aleksandr <364961 at mail dot ru> changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED

[Bug c++/105386] [11/12 Regression] Tuple in unevaluated context is instantiated; creates reference to void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105386 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/105394] New: [12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with MVE during GIMPLE pass: veclower2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394 Bug ID: 105394 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with MVE during GIMPLE pass: veclower2 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug analyzer/105382] Support for coroutines in -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105382 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Looks like the analyzer is assuming that all of the different _Coro_resume_index values are possible at each entry to f(f()::_Z1fv.Frame*), but AIUI that value is expressing which basic block the coroutine i

[Bug rtl-optimization/105395] New: Invalid reload of atomic operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105395 Bug ID: 105395 Summary: Invalid reload of atomic operation Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/105375] std::packaged_task has no deduction guide.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105375 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb6f6f638a547f0330cc7940c5389039b59e4e76 commit r11-9936-geb6f6f638a547f0330cc7940c5389039b59e4e76 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/105375] std::packaged_task has no deduction guide.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105375 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/105393] A simple for loop becomes an infinite when -O1/2/3 used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105393 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID CC|

[Bug modula2/105390] [12 regression] sigfpe redeclared in mc-boot-ch/GSysExceptions.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105390 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/105394] [12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with MVE during GIMPLE pass: veclower2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/105394] [12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with MVE during GIMPLE pass: veclower2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394 --- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Hmm, in my cross-arm build I get > > > ./cc1plus -quiet t.c -I include -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve -mfloat-abi=hard > > -O > cc1plus: error: target CPU does not s

[Bug sanitizer/105396] New: missed stack-buffer-overflow by -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396 Bug ID: 105396 Summary: missed stack-buffer-overflow by -O0 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

[Bug libstdc++/103853] std::forward_list::merge should check if __list != this

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103853 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93d720f0ec7651e6a402dda33553817c1ad14ded commit r10-10559-g93d720f0ec7651e6a402dda33553817c1ad14ded Author: Pavel I. Kr

[Bug libstdc++/103911] std::from_chars shouldn't call isdigit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103911 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b596c35a4ed0143e84422449020296b43a655de7 commit r10-10560-gb596c35a4ed0143e84422449020296b43a655de7 Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/103650] [9/10 Regression] libstdc++ headers defined LT_OBJDIR and STDC_HEADERS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103650 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24eb54cc3b564f2bfa6d7e2fa26ddc82c8b2dc18 commit r10-10569-g24eb54cc3b564f2bfa6d7e2fa26ddc82c8b2dc18 Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/103630] [9/10 Regression] std::make_exception_ptr(t) is ill-formed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103630 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02b601ad7ea06460e7bc42d7251e895d9031bc6e commit r10-10570-g02b601ad7ea06460e7bc42d7251e895d9031bc6e Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/49745] error: ‘int truncate’ redeclared as different kind of symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745 --- Comment #26 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:436891d97aef6d7a8e107d2d3e02e8ca4c52a51a commit r10-10571-g436891d97aef6d7a8e107d2d3e02e8ca4c52a51a Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/100117] FAIL testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++1998/49745.cc with trunk glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100117 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:436891d97aef6d7a8e107d2d3e02e8ca4c52a51a commit r10-10571-g436891d97aef6d7a8e107d2d3e02e8ca4c52a51a Author: Jonathan Wak

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103013 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba2baf20356befbba6c8d83bbb3676cfee7e146f commit r10-10574-gba2baf20356befbba6c8d83bbb3676cfee7e146f Author: Jonathan Wa

[Bug libstdc++/100153] Undefined behavior in stl_bvector.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100153 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60da20c0cdfb6df11bce054ba82b71a0a24a1bd9 commit r10-10575-g60da20c0cdfb6df11bce054ba82b71a0a24a1bd9 Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/102048] __gnu_cxx::rope.erase(size_t __p) implementation seems to be wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102048 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dcd1fc4900fd101f8fa22883b6ac31e6f7601373 commit r10-10576-gdcd1fc4900fd101f8fa22883b6ac31e6f7601373 Author: Jonathan Wa

[Bug libstdc++/104098] [11 Regression] bits/stl_iterator.h fails to compile for __cplusplus > 201703L and with __cpp_concepts undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104098 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c8f58be95d666e08221447d43d84782e1e6fb95 commit r10-10578-g5c8f58be95d666e08221447d43d84782e1e6fb95 Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/103630] [9 Regression] std::make_exception_ptr(t) is ill-formed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103630 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] |[9 Regression] |std

[Bug libstdc++/103911] std::from_chars shouldn't call isdigit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103911 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/105394] [12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with MVE during GIMPLE pass: veclower2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- We are calling tree_vec_extract with bitsize 32 but a QImode boolean type. ICK. (gdb) p debug_gimple_stmt (stmt) _8 = VEC_COND_EXPR <_6, _7, { 3.0e+0, 3.0e+0, 3.0e+0, 3.0e+0 }>; $15 = void (gdb) p debug_t

[Bug tree-optimization/105394] [12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with MVE during GIMPLE pass: veclower2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103013 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed for 10.4 and 11.4 too.

[Bug target/105394] [12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with MVE during GIMPLE pass: veclower2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |target Assignee|rguenth at g

[Bug sanitizer/105396] missed stack-buffer-overflow by -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-04-26 Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/105325] power10: Error: operand out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325 --- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool --- It should use "YZ" as constraint (Y is DS-mode, Z is X-mode). The predicate should probably be lwa_operand ("lwau" does not exist, that's the irregularity this predicate is for).

[Bug lto/105364] lto-wrapper generates URLs escape sequences despite -fdiagnostic-urls=never

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105364 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd4acb8cd9e45fd35664baa5b0a3150e479aae32 commit r12-8269-gcd4acb8cd9e45fd35664baa5b0a3150e479aae32 Author: Martin Liska Date: Tue

[Bug sanitizer/105396] missed stack-buffer-overflow by -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think the bug is visible in -fdump-rtl-expand-details dump: Partition 2: size 40 align 16 c Partition 1: size 8 align 8 b Partition 0: size 4 align 4 a_1 Partition 3: size 4 align 8

[Bug lto/105364] lto-wrapper generates URLs escape sequences despite -fdiagnostic-urls=never

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105364 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/105346] [11/12 Regression] -Wno-free-nonheap-object false positive (on Bison-generated grammar code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > >: > bufp_2 = &buf; > if (&buf != bufp_2) > goto ; [INV] > else > goto ; [INV] > >: > __builtin_free (bufp_2); > > and for the stm

[Bug middle-end/105346] [11/12 Regression] -Wno-free-nonheap-object false positive (on Bison-generated grammar code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105346 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/78054] gfortran.dg/pr70673.f90 FAILs at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug sanitizer/105396] missed stack-buffer-overflow by -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, the bug is clearly in asan_redzone_buffer::emit_redzone_byte. The off == offset case is handled correctly, but the other case is valid only if the gap is bigger such that we need to flush in between. --

[Bug sanitizer/105396] missed stack-buffer-overflow by -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Oops, sorry Martin, missed you ASSIGNED this to yourself. If you have your fix for this, go ahead with it, if you don't, I can test mine.

[Bug c++/105386] [11/12 Regression] Tuple in unevaluated context is instantiated; creates reference to void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105386 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6a48401da51e9042b6f0822d532b3b472492658 commit r12-8270-gb6a48401da51e9042b6f0822d532b3b472492658 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug fortran/103662] [12 Regression] TBAA problem in Fortran FE triggering in gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103662 --- Comment #24 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- Thanks a lot! Honza

  1   2   >