https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105206
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 02:45:22PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> This might be related to PR89125. The patch I attached to that PR has never
> found its way into the repository. I'll do some mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105206
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105231
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89125
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45592|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105226
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
Summary|[1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105232
Bug ID: 105232
Summary: ICE in tree_to_poly_int64, at tree.cc:3224
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105232
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
Summary|ICE in tree_to_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103623
--- Comment #32 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0508f0b810985f4a8543ce44701ec7330ef29796
commit r12-8091-g0508f0b810985f4a8543ce44701ec7330ef29796
Author: Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105213
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0508f0b810985f4a8543ce44701ec7330ef29796
commit r12-8091-g0508f0b810985f4a8543ce44701ec7330ef29796
Author: Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98249
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d087b59527a658a4de13febbb593edbf03339e93
commit r12-8093-gd087b59527a658a4de13febbb593edbf03339e93
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105223
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d74c4c6a1b4956b5cd9b2a770bb7261836fa1289
commit r12-8095-gd74c4c6a1b4956b5cd9b2a770bb7261836fa1289
Author: Peter Bergner
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105207
--- Comment #4 from Pavel M ---
To: Andrew Pinski
At the 1st glance I expected to see that -E produces the output after splicing
is done (i.e. xxx #error). However, the "preprocessing only" is out of scope of
the C11. As stackoverflow.com user
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105233
Bug ID: 105233
Summary: Incorrect "alignment not an integer constant" error in
alignas with template parameter dependent argument
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103623
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105234
Bug ID: 105234
Summary: nlining failed in call to 'always_inline'
'fmt::v8::basic_format_string::basic_format_string(const S&)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105234
--- Comment #1 from Khem Raj ---
here is another testcase from gnupg on mips with gcc12 failing
$ mips-yoe-linux-gcc dirmngr.i
In file included from
/mnt/b/yoe/master/build/tmp/work/mips32r2-yoe-linux/gnupg/2.3.4-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/include/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105234
--- Comment #2 from Khem Raj ---
Created attachment 52787
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52787&action=edit
test case 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105234
--- Comment #3 from Khem Raj ---
Second sample works when I do not use _FORTIFY_SOURCES=2, so perhaps gcc-12
needs to adjust some glibc headers ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105216
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
Probably related to below 3 cancelled jump thread which affects pre.
2076Threading through latch before loop opts would create non-empty latch:
2077 Cancelling jump thread: (15, 16) incoming edge; (16, 43)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105223
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4195fced8a13422db94e179404588d9d887a036a
commit r12-8098-g4195fced8a13422db94e179404588d9d887a036a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4195fced8a13422db94e179404588d9d887a036a
commit r12-8098-g4195fced8a13422db94e179404588d9d887a036a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0899b22d9329c1e8fc12d6f0deee0f87dcc0163a
commit r12-8099-g0899b22d9329c1e8fc12d6f0deee0f87dcc0163a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105223
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-8090-20220411190659-g1774ab84863-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-pr105211-pr105214-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220411 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105235
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
A slightly different testcase fails elsewhere:
$ cat testcase.c
int i, j;
void
foo (double d)
{
i = __builtin_ilogbl (d);
j = __builtin_sinl (d);
}
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O -fno-tree-dominator-opts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105236
Bug ID: 105236
Summary: failed lookup of alias with alias template of
dependent template parameter containing lambda in
unevaluated context
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105216
--- Comment #11 from Hongtao.liu ---
There's post_loop pass_thread_jumps, add a copy of pass_pre doesn't help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105227
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105206
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105206
>
> --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo