[Bug c/105100] [10/11/12 Regression] Strange warning when modifying structures "writing 1 byte into a region of size 0" when compile with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105100 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 RegressionStrange |[10/11/12 Regression]

[Bug c++/105104] [coroutines] ICE during GIMPLE pass: coro-early-expand-ifns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105104 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-30 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/105061] [10/11/12 Regression] [c++2a+] anonymous bitfield templated offset rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105061 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f2795218a6ba6a7b7b9b18ca7a6e390661e1608 commit r12-7913-g4f2795218a6ba6a7b7b9b18ca7a6e390661e1608 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug c++/105061] [10/11/12 Regression] [c++2a+] anonymous bitfield templated offset rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105061 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b5a2b6e4f78395962835790c6d4a3e27ab8d378 commit r11-9738-g7b5a2b6e4f78395962835790c6d4a3e27ab8d378 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/105061] [10 Regression] [c++2a+] anonymous bitfield templated offset rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105061 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|[10/11/12 R

[Bug c++/105092] ICE with local with NULL DECL_CONTEXT on templatized OpenMP iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105092 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:410f39f56c14b195f066b9a18a3c6e8ffa03f848 commit r12-7915-g410f39f56c14b195f066b9a18a3c6e8ffa03f848 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug middle-end/99578] [11 Regression] gcc-11 -Warray-bounds or -Wstringop-overread warning when accessing a pointer from integer literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578 --- Comment #40 from Martin Liška --- Can we close it as it was backported to gcc-11, Jakub?

[Bug sanitizer/102656] [11 Regression] ICE on coroutines on -fsanitize=address -O1 since r11-1613-g788b962aa00959e8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102656 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/104601] [11 Regression] Invalid branch elimination at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104601 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/104674] [11 Regression] i686 sse2: The two results of __divmoddi4 are mixed up

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104674 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/104675] [9/10 Regression] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.cc:9773 at -O with __real__ + __imag__ extraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104675 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE: |[9/10 Regression] ICE: in

[Bug target/104681] [9/10 Regression] ppc64le -mabi=ieeelongdouble ICE since r9-6460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104681 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression] ppc64le

[Bug target/104775] [9/10 Regression] Failure to assemble on s390x with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104775 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression] Failure

[Bug target/104910] [10 Regression] ICE: internal consistency failure (error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104910 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE: |[10 Regression] ICE:

[Bug rtl-optimization/104589] [11 Regression] Emitted binary code changes when -g is enabled at -O0 -flto and optimize attribute since r11-3026-gfea13fcd0da03535

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/104814] [10 Regression] ifcvt: Deleting live variable in IF-CASE-2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104814 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ifcvt: |[10 Regression] ifcvt:

[Bug c++/104568] [10 Regression] ICE [c++20] caused by option "-std=c++20 -Wall" when operand of operator new has size equal to 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104568 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE |[10 Regression] ICE [c++20]

[Bug middle-end/99578] [11 Regression] gcc-11 -Warray-bounds or -Wstringop-overread warning when accessing a pointer from integer literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 99578, which changed state. Bug 99578 Summary: [11 Regression] gcc-11 -Warray-bounds or -Wstringop-overread warning when accessing a pointer from integer literal https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578

[Bug tree-optimization/101515] [11 Regression] ICE in pp_cxx_unqualified_id, at cp/cxx-pretty-print.c:128 since r11-6729-gadb520606ce3e1e1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101515 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|qinzhao at gcc

[Bug middle-end/104971] [9/10 Regression] Optimisation for __builtin_ia32_readeflags corrupts the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104971 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/105035] [11 Regression] tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in operand_equal_p, at fold-const.c:3335 since r11-5181-g0862d007b564eca8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105035 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/105092] ICE with local with NULL DECL_CONTEXT on templatized OpenMP iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105092 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/105094] [10/11/12 Regression] UBSAN in clear_bit_region(unsigned char*, unsigned int, unsigned int) (gimple-ssa-store-merging.cc:1834)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105094 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:387e818cda0ffde86f624228c3da1ab28f453685 commit r12-7916-g387e818cda0ffde86f624228c3da1ab28f453685 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug rtl-optimization/105091] RTL dse1 remove stack mem storing incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105091 --- Comment #9 from Jiu Fu Guo --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #8) ... > > package main > > func main() { > for _, test := range []struct { > x, y, want []int > }{ > {[]int{}, []int{}, nil

[Bug sanitizer/105093] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7607 since r6-3529-gf11a7b6d57f6fcba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105093 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3e68fa59ead502c24950298b53c637bbe535a74 commit r12-7917-ge3e68fa59ead502c24950298b53c637bbe535a74 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug tree-optimization/105094] [10/11/12 Regression] UBSAN in clear_bit_region(unsigned char*, unsigned int, unsigned int) (gimple-ssa-store-merging.cc:1834)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105094 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c4767659c817dc4cec897215ca8f9ea930e309e commit r11-9740-g5c4767659c817dc4cec897215ca8f9ea930e309e Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug sanitizer/105093] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7607 since r6-3529-gf11a7b6d57f6fcba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105093 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:76a8ab576dbbe14b5a11e9feb454c3ca2f9b7e97 commit r11-9741-g76a8ab576dbbe14b5a11e9feb454c3ca2f9b7e97 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/105094] [10 Regression] UBSAN in clear_bit_region(unsigned char*, unsigned int, unsigned int) (gimple-ssa-store-merging.cc:1834)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105094 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] UBSAN |[10 Regression] UBSAN in

[Bug sanitizer/105093] [9/10 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7607 since r6-3529-gf11a7b6d57f6fcba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105093 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Summary|ICE in

[Bug c++/105077] The std::bad_array_new_length is not thrown for some new array scenarios.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105077 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's the same. In both cases the compiler fails to check if the size expression is erroneous, and calls operator new(n) with a bad value that causes a std::bad_alloc exception. I'm both cases, the compiler

[Bug target/104853] [RISC-V] -march=rv64g not including extension Zifencei

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104853 Kito Cheng changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-30 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #41 from Richard Biener --- -- random ideas dumping below -- so reading about ISO_Fortran_binding.h it seems to be that a base of the object isn't readily available and making it available would require quite some computation. stay

[Bug gcov-profile/105063] [GCOV] Ability to map .gcda paths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105063 --- Comment #2 from vit9696 --- Sure, the example is published on godbolt, but for completeness: int main() {} gcc -fprofile-arcs -S t.c -o t.s cat t.s | grep gcda Adding the mentioned arguments (e.g. -fprofile-prefix-map=/home/user=/test) sh

[Bug c++/105099] In lookup of namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105099 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-30 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/105099] In lookup of namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105099 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Based on the issue submission date, Clark was probably talking about GCC 3.1 or similar. So maybe this is a regression since the new C++ parser was introduced.

[Bug middle-end/105071] [9 Regression] Incorrect code with -Os and complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105071 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- I have asked for permission to backport the fix in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-March/592520.html

[Bug target/104796] ABI change is not mentioned in HTML changelog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104796 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-March/592522.html

[Bug target/102024] [12 Regression] zero width bitfields and ABIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, to sum up: aarch64, arm, x86-64 and riscv (last one since GCC 10 already) do ignore zero width bit-fields in argument/return value passing decisions and so have a C ABI incompatibility from earlier GCC

[Bug target/102024] [12 Regression] zero width bitfields and ABIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug gcov-profile/105063] [GCOV] Ability to map .gcda paths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105063 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- > > But it will remain to be something like: > > .string "/home/user/t.gcda Well, -fprofile-prefix-map is about the mapping of the source file. So what exactly is your problem? Are the long filename

[Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #42 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 52717 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52717&action=edit hack to rewrite all ARRA_REFs This shows a simple hack emitting *(&array + offset) from gfc_build_array_ref.

[Bug fortran/105105] New: Fortran IEEE support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105105 Bug ID: 105105 Summary: Fortran IEEE support Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assigne

[Bug target/104796] ABI change is not mentioned in HTML changelog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104796 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libquadmath/78415] sqrtq does not round correctly when round mode is upward

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78415 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libquadmath/105101] incorrect rounding for sqrtq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/105106] New: Dependent invocation with defaulted NTTP lambda fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105106 Bug ID: 105106 Summary: Dependent invocation with defaulted NTTP lambda fails Product: gcc Version: 9.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/105071] [9 Regression] Incorrect code with -Os and complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105071 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dc4bed43760c4e291e072aa0c8c450f5775e25f commit r9-1-g1dc4bed43760c4e291e072aa0c8c450f5775e25f Author: Martin Jambor D

[Bug tree-optimization/97456] [10/11 Regression] An incorrect optimization causes a function to always return the same value when using -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97456 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dc4bed43760c4e291e072aa0c8c450f5775e25f commit r9-1-g1dc4bed43760c4e291e072aa0c8c450f5775e25f Author: Martin Jambor D

[Bug middle-end/105071] [9 Regression] Incorrect code with -Os and complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105071 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/97456] [10/11 Regression] An incorrect optimization causes a function to always return the same value when using -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97456 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dlong at cadence dot com --- Comment #12

[Bug c++/105099] [9/10/11/12 Regression] In lookup of namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105099 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.1, 11.2.1, 12.0,

[Bug libquadmath/105101] incorrect rounding for sqrtq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/102024] [12 Regression] zero width bitfields and ABIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024 --- Comment #24 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23) > CCing MIPS maintainers on this (and also LoongArch, while there is no ABI > incompatibility for a new port, it is perhaps something to discuss and > decid

[Bug target/102024] [12 Regression] zero width bitfields and ABIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek --- Sorry, apparently I must have misread the mmix below mips as being mips too.

[Bug c++/105106] Dependent invocation with defaulted NTTP lambda fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105106 --- Comment #1 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- There is implementation divergence in the resulting closure type(s): https://godbolt.org/z/W98r49o8s.

[Bug target/102024] [12 Regression] zero width bitfields and ABIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/104796] ABI change is not mentioned in HTML changelog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104796 Bug 104796 depends on bug 102024, which changed state. Bug 102024 Summary: [12 Regression] zero width bitfields and ABIs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/102024] [12 Regression] zero width bitfields and ABIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024 --- Comment #27 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23) > struct A { double a; int : 0; double b; }; For MIPS I've done some experiment with this and the result (with N64 ABI) is: With GCC trunk, G++ trunk, and GCC 11.

[Bug rtl-optimization/105091] RTL dse1 remove stack mem storing incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105091 --- Comment #10 from Jiu Fu Guo --- Created attachment 52718 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52718&action=edit m.go sub1.go Based on Ian's code, the below code also reproduce this issue. package sub1 func TestBits(callback

[Bug target/105068] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.cc:2692 (insn does not satisfy its constraints: ssse3_pshufbv16qi3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105068 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00d12a4a0fd56d8e9be1672e5e7637416b27fbb1 commit r11-9750-g00d12a4a0fd56d8e9be1672e5e7637416b27fbb1 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon

[Bug c++/93280] [10 Regression] ICE: in cp_gimplify_expr, at cp /cp-gimplify.c:933 since g:08f594eb399dab06

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93280 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8c1f29a0b47b4b4a3c1506678f7ca2ce4b7ffbb commit r12-7919-gf8c1f29a0b47b4b4a3c1506678f7ca2ce4b7ffbb Author: Marek Polacek Date: Fri

[Bug c++/104583] [10/11/12 regression] ICE dolphin-emu at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:746

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104583 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8c1f29a0b47b4b4a3c1506678f7ca2ce4b7ffbb commit r12-7919-gf8c1f29a0b47b4b4a3c1506678f7ca2ce4b7ffbb Author: Marek Polacek Date: Fr

[Bug sanitizer/105107] New: false positive stack-buffer-overflow in ASAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105107 Bug ID: 105107 Summary: false positive stack-buffer-overflow in ASAN Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: san

[Bug target/102024] [12 Regression] zero width bitfields and ABIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024 --- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #27) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23) > > > struct A { double a; int : 0; double b; }; > > For MIPS I've done some experiment with this and the result (wi

[Bug rtl-optimization/105091] RTL dse1 remove stack mem storing incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105091 --- Comment #11 from Jiu Fu Guo --- Find one difference between trunk and r12-656: On trunk: tree expr = MEM_EXPR (mem); where mem is (mem/f/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 110 sfp) (const_int 32 [0x20])) [3 GOTMP.2[0].x.__values+0 S8 A12

[Bug c++/104583] [10/11 regression] ICE dolphin-emu at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:746

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104583 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 regression] ICE |[10/11 regression] ICE

[Bug target/102772] [12 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772 --- Comment #30 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a777ceb0e975f0efc823d2d82e676346f068151 commit r12-7920-g6a777ceb0e975f0efc823d2d82e676346f068151 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/80334] [5 Regression] Segfault when taking address of copy of unaligned struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80334 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a777ceb0e975f0efc823d2d82e676346f068151 commit r12-7920-g6a777ceb0e975f0efc823d2d82e676346f068151 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug c++/100474] ICE: in diagnose_trait_expr, at cp/constraint.cc:3706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100474 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3aaf9bf77047aecc23072fe3db7f13ecff72a7cf commit r12-7921-g3aaf9bf77047aecc23072fe3db7f13ecff72a7cf Author: Patrick Palka Date: W

[Bug rtl-optimization/105091] RTL dse1 remove stack mem storing incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105091 --- Comment #12 from Jiu Fu Guo --- In dse.cc, "may_be_aliased" affects "can_escape" and then affects "kill_on_calls".

[Bug rtl-optimization/105091] RTL dse1 remove stack mem storing incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105091 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/100474] ICE: in diagnose_trait_expr, at cp/constraint.cc:3706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100474 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3 Known to work|

[Bug c++/101030] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wconversion and a?:b extension in template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101030 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5db9ce171019f8915885cebd5cc5f4101bb926e6 commit r12-7922-g5db9ce171019f8915885cebd5cc5f4101bb926e6 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tu

[Bug c++/101030] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE with -Wconversion and a?:b extension in template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101030 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE

[Bug sanitizer/105107] false positive stack-buffer-overflow in ASAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105107 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/101030] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE with -Wconversion and a?:b extension in template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101030 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:511e8b612287ad828c60f2f12c500ccfa26c275c commit r11-9751-g511e8b612287ad828c60f2f12c500ccfa26c275c Author: Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/101030] [9/10 Regression] ICE with -Wconversion and a?:b extension in template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101030 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE|[9/10 Regression] ICE with

[Bug target/102024] [12 Regression] zero width bitfields and ABIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024 --- Comment #29 from Xi Ruoyao --- > Is there somebody who can clarify the MIPS ABI intent? > Also, what does LLVM do? I've CC'ed Yunqiang and Fangrui. And I'll build clang for MIPS to see...

[Bug debug/105108] New: incomplete/incorrect DWARF information at -O1 and -Og after inlining a function returning a constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105108 Bug ID: 105108 Summary: incomplete/incorrect DWARF information at -O1 and -Og after inlining a function returning a constant Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/102772] [12 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug sanitizer/105107] false positive stack-buffer-overflow in ASAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105107 --- Comment #2 from Li Shaohua --- Thanks for your prompt reply. The warning messages only appeared for -O0 and -O3, not for -O1 and -O2. I wonder this might also be an issue.

[Bug target/102772] [12 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772 --- Comment #32 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, this is a well known problem that stddef.h's max_align_t does not agree with malloc on i386 Solaris. Glibc used to have the same problem. Fixing it in the compiler or in operator new seems reasonabl

[Bug target/102772] [12 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772 --- Comment #33 from Jonathan Wakely --- (IMHO we should never have added float128 to max_align_t for targets where we can't change malloc, but that was decided long ago).

[Bug target/102772] [12 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772 --- Comment #34 from Jonathan Wakely --- Assuming that posix_memalign is slower than malloc (which seems likely), it would be better to fix this in the compiler by defining __STDCPP_DEFAULT_NEW_ALIGNMENT__=8 for i386 solaris, instead of setting

[Bug target/102772] [12 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/104414] [AArch64] About the condition of calls_alloca in aarch64_layout_frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104414 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/102772] [12 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772 --- Comment #36 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 52719 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52719&action=edit gcc12-pr102772.patch So like this?

[Bug tree-optimization/105109] New: [12 Regression] False positive warning on complex float code since r12-155

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105109 Bug ID: 105109 Summary: [12 Regression] False positive warning on complex float code since r12-155 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug tree-optimization/105109] [12 Regression] False positive warning on complex float code since r12-155

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105109 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/105110] New: NTTP type deduction fails when dependent of previous NTTPs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105110 Bug ID: 105110 Summary: NTTP type deduction fails when dependent of previous NTTPs Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug fortran/105105] [Meta] Fortran IEEE support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105105 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||67531, 69101, 78314, 82968,

[Bug libquadmath/105101] incorrect rounding for sqrtq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libquadmath/105101] incorrect rounding for sqrtq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > > > So, do we need to switch to soft-fp based implementation for it (we have a > > copy already in libgcc/soft-f

[Bug ada/80869] Ada.Directories is missing Name_Case_Equivalence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80869 --- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org --- This was fixed 4 years ago.

[Bug ada/80869] Ada.Directories is missing Name_Case_Equivalence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80869 Arnaud Charlet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/105032] Compiling inline ASM x86 causing GCC stuck in an endless loop with 100% CPU usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105032 --- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov --- I've reproduced the bug also on the trunk. The loop in question assumes a specific order for reload insns. In this case order of insns involving the reload pseudos is violated because the pseudo is als

[Bug middle-end/105032] Compiling inline ASM x86 causing GCC stuck in an endless loop with 100% CPU usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105032 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22b0476a814a4759bb68f38b9415624a0fe52a7d commit r12-7924-g22b0476a814a4759bb68f38b9415624a0fe52a7d Author: Vladimir N. Makarov

[Bug middle-end/105032] Compiling inline ASM x86 causing GCC stuck in an endless loop with 100% CPU usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105032 --- Comment #12 from Vladimir Makarov --- GCC-11 branch needs a bit different patch. I'll commit a modified patch to gcc-11 branch on Friday.

[Bug gcov-profile/105063] [GCOV] Ability to map .gcda paths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105063 --- Comment #4 from vit9696 --- Path length limitation in the current case is 200 bytes, but in general the issue is that we would like _to be able to properly set the gcda path for the target_. Currently the specified path may not even exist wh

  1   2   >