https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99121
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97631
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101604
Bug 101604 depends on bug 97548, which changed state.
Bug 97548 Summary: [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression
involving a parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101289
Bug 101289 depends on bug 97548, which changed state.
Bug 97548 Summary: [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression
involving a parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96963
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96171
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95189
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95072
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94923
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94655
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94040
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92799
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91848
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91584
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91490
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91147
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91076
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90983
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90959
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90904
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90752
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 90752, which changed state.
Bug 90752 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds accessing the result of string
functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90752
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89678
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88780
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88771
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88059
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87034
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85650
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84603
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84577
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84561
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83429
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102426
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #8)
>> > --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>> > So, shouldn't we instead of the -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82608
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82601
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79554
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77721
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85741
Bug 85741 depends on bug 77721, which changed state.
Bug 77721 Summary: -Wformat-truncation not uses arg range for converted vars
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77721
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71319
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102943
--- Comment #51 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8db155ddf8cec9e31f0a4b8d80cc67db2c7a26f9
commit r12-7692-g8db155ddf8cec9e31f0a4b8d80cc67db2c7a26f9
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104971
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Cooper ---
So yes - my experimentation did start from investigating the memory ordering
behaviour of these builtins, based on a thread on LKML.
The pushf in readflags and popf in writeflags have wildly different order
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104968
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104971
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104972
Bug ID: 104972
Summary: Class dummy argument for array of custom types stuck
on -fcheck=bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90356
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c482c28ba4c549006deb70dead90fe8ab34dcbcf
commit r12-7693-gc482c28ba4c549006deb70dead90fe8ab34dcbcf
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86722
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c482c28ba4c549006deb70dead90fe8ab34dcbcf
commit r12-7693-gc482c28ba4c549006deb70dead90fe8ab34dcbcf
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #21)
> Deferring to Andrew per comment #19.
That part was fixed already by r12-6061-gd957d250942b13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104972
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104908
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||albandil at atlas dot cz
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101895
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
And just an FYI. As expected this resolves the regression on our internal
target. Thanks Roger!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104965
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think the missed optimization is recorded as either PR 79349 or PR 103827.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104973
Bug ID: 104973
Summary: GCC 11.2.1 build failure with Go support (mv: cannot
stat 'cpugen.o': No such file or directory)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
URL: https://bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104973
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you attach what is inside cpugen.go?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104974
Bug ID: 104974
Summary: [avx512fp16] Error: operand type mismatch for `vmovw'
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104974
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104973
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Your build log shows a line like this:
libtool: compile:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.2.1_p20211127/work/build/./gcc/gccgo
-B/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-11.2.1_p20211127/work/build/./gcc/
-B/usr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104975
Bug ID: 104975
Summary: ICE in execute, at gimple-harden-conditionals.cc:577
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101168
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
101 - 162 of 162 matches
Mail list logo