https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #11 from Roland Illig ---
>From aarch64-sve-builtins.cc:
> passing %qT to argument %d of %qE, which expects a scalar integer
"scalar integer" sounds redundant, this may be a copy-and-paste mistake from
the message directly above, wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #12 from Roland Illig ---
>From aarch64-sve-builtins.cc:
> "capture by copy of SVE type %qT"
This message should use the same grammar as the related ones, the word "cannot"
is a useful indicator of the general error condition.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #13 from Roland Illig ---
>From aarch64.cc:
> invalid feature modifier %s
The %s must be %qs, like in the related messages.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #14 from Roland Illig ---
>From aarch64.cc:
> "invalid name (%qs) in % pragma or attribute"
What is the point of having parentheses around %qs? That seems redundant to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #15 from Roland Illig ---
>From aarch64.cc:
> arch extension %<%s%>
Use the idiomatic %qs instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #16 from Roland Illig ---
>From arm-builtins.cc:
> "the range of count should be in 0 to 32;
> please check the intrinsic %<_mm_rori_pi16%> in code"
Please double-check whether the "0 to 32" is a typo and should rather be "0 to
16".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104794
Bug ID: 104794
Summary: arm: use translation pattern for repetitive messages
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104794
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
>From arm-builtins.cc:
> "the range of count should be in 0 to 32;
> please check the intrinsic %<_mm_rori_pi16%> in code"
While here, please double-check whether the "0 to 32" is a typo and should
rather be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104794
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
While here, please add the missing space in the middle of the string:
error ("incompatible options %'-mstack-protector-guard=global%' and"
"%'-mstack-protector-guard-offset=%qs%'",
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104794
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
While here:
> error ("incompatible options %'-mstack-protector-guard=global%' and"
>"%'-mstack-protector-guard-offset=%qs%'",
The idiomatic way to write quotes is %<...%>, not %'...%'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104794
--- Comment #4 from Roland Illig ---
And another thing:
> %'-mstack-protector-guard-offset=%qs%'
This produces nested quotes. The %qs should rather be a simple %s. Maybe you
can write a unit test to see how the end result looks. I didn't find a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104794
--- Comment #5 from Roland Illig ---
Same for %'-mstack-protector-guard=tls%' in the same file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #17 from Roland Illig ---
>From bfin.cc:
> cannott
Should be "cannot".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100693
Will Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||willschm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104795
Bug ID: 104795
Summary: inconsistent wording in diagnostics
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104796
Bug ID: 104796
Summary: ABI change is not mentioned in HTML changelog
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104797
Bug ID: 104797
Summary: too many parentheses in diagnostic for __delay_cycles
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #18 from Roland Illig ---
>From nds32.cc:
> this built-in function not support on the v3m toolchain
"support" should be "supported".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
--- Comment #11 from Roland Illig ---
Is there a general plan of fixing these "trivial" nits? Half of my reports from
2019 are still open after 3 years.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #19 from Roland Illig ---
>From nvptx.cc:
> PTX version (-mptx) needs to be at least %s to support selected -misa (sm_%s)
Missing %<...%> around -mptx and -misa.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #20 from Roland Illig ---
>From pru.cc:
> register name %<%s%>
Please use the canonical %qs instead of the unnecessarily verbose %<%s%>.
Everywhere.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104552
--- Comment #21 from Roland Illig ---
>From rs6000-c.cc:
> passing argument %d of %qE discards const qualifier from pointer target type
The word "const" must be in % quotes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99297
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.0|12.0
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90148
--- Comment #7 from Roland Illig ---
Still reproducible in GCC 12. Any chance of these trivial things getting fixed
in the next year?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104208
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
I tested GCC 11 and it fails the same way, so we'll need to backport this fix
there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104786
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12.0]internal compiler |ICE with VLA type and "=X"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104786
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104792
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I cannot reproduce this. Even the godbolt link does not give a warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104787
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104208
--- Comment #12 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #11)
> I tested GCC 11 and it fails the same way, so we'll need to backport this
> fix there.
Ditto for GCC 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52563|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104785
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104785
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98712
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||delleyves at gmx dot ch
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104698
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1301d7f647c7ac40da7f910aa6e790205e34bb8b
commit r12-7501-g1301d7f647c7ac40da7f910aa6e790205e34bb8b
Author: Michael Meissner
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104782
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104780
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
101 - 137 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
