https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104664
--- Comment #2 from Hongyu Wang ---
starting from r12-6021
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104673
Bug ID: 104673
Summary: powerpc e500mc Error: unrecognized opcode: `isel'
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104673
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
How did you configure GCC? How did you invoke GCC?
Can you attach the preprocessed source rather than the generated assembly code?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104663
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104666
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98202
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87274
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There's a related (but slightly different) problem for F128 suffixes:
auto f = __FLT128_MIN__;
f128.C:1:10: error: unable to find numeric literal operator ‘operator""F128’
The macros for the F128 constan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103407
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52501|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104674
Bug ID: 104674
Summary: i686 sse2: The two results of __divmoddi4 are mixed up
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104663
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aros at gmx dot com
--- Comment #20 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104664
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: in |[12 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
--- Comment #19 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #18)
> The git snapshot 20220130 from the gcc-11 branch still fails. However, since
> Matthias just uploaded 20220222, I can try that as well a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104665
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
In principle loop distribution could recognize this but it currently is doing
too simplistic checking for this, not sure how difficult handling this would
be.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104666
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104648
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104674
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
ary-trunk-r12-7366-20220224090510-gffb2c671707-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220224 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-24
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104672
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56190
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eliphat at sjtu dot edu.cn
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104675
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104675
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
It was this part:
(-1 - A -> ~A): Remove unnecessary condition.
Which caused the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64454
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104428
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-24
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104429
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-24
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104430
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104438
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104457
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104675
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|10.3.1, 11.2.1, 12.0, |
|6.5.0, 7.5.0, 8.5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104468
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104675
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
>
> I think both:
> /* -A - 1 -> ~A */
> (simplify
>(minus (convert? (negate @0)) integer_each_onep)
>(if (!TYPE_OVERFLOW_TRAPS (type)
> && tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra ---
I have spent some time over the last few days digging into history relevant to
this bug as part of looking into a binutils report that an ARCH=powerpc
CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux- pmac32_defconfig linux kernel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104675
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104537
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104554
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104555
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104556
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |ICE in
|gfc_conv_class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104671
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103353
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #5)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> > You miss all extra errors the expand_call can generate. This is the general
> > reason why we try to conti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68350
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104674
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104674
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems similar to PR78791.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104664
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89408
--- Comment #7 from Stephen Kell ---
Thanks for the backstory. I understand that 'accept as much as possible' isn't
the goal, nor would it be wise.
The pedwarn message you quoted, which explicitly makes reference to integer
constant expressions,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104676
Bug ID: 104676
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at
cfgloop.cc:1748 (error: loop 3's number of iterations
'(unsigned int) + 4294967295' references the released
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104677
Bug ID: 104677
Summary: With -fprofile-arcs, the name of the .gcda file is
incorrect
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104674
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52508
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52508&action=edit
gcc12-pr104674.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104670
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104569
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |ICE in
|generate_coarr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104676
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-24
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104676
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104570
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104676
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
loop distribution removes
_31 = s_18(D)->f;
releasing SSA name 31 but loop 3 still has nb_iterations == (unsigned int) _31
+ 4294967295
loop distribution already does scev_reset_htab but should just use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104614
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68350
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> - If the input and output type are the same size and both are trivially
> constructible, we can use memcpy.
Correction: they need to be the same type. We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in fixup_array_ref, at |ICE in fixup_array_ref, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104627
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104675
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
I am only learning now that bit ops don't exist for complex numbers :-/
I don't really see why not, but that's a different question. Thanks for fixing
this.
Looking to see if I could quickly find other similar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104601
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9251b457eb8df912f2e8203d0ee8ab300c041520
commit r12-7371-g9251b457eb8df912f2e8203d0ee8ab300c041520
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104601
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] Invalid |[11 Regression] Invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104662
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104662
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68350
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> - If the output type is trivially default constructible and is assignable
> from
> the input type, we can use std::copy (but it's unclear whether that give
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68350
--- Comment #12 from Arthur O'Dwyer ---
jwakely wrote:
> Correction: they need to be the same type. We can't memcpy here:
>
> struct A { };
> struct B { B() = default; B(A) { do_stuff(); } };
>
> void (A* f, A* l, B* out) {
> std::uninitialized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104676
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a4066d3a5097333f17c0d7be1630a98f3a5b1c1d
commit r12-7372-ga4066d3a5097333f17c0d7be1630a98f3a5b1c1d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104676
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104678
Bug ID: 104678
Summary: pointer to member cannot be passed as template
argument after derived/base cast
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104677
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|With -fprofile-arcs, the|Please update documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104677
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104629
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104637
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-24
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104638
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: maximum number of LRA |ICE: maximum number of LRA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104643
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104679
Bug ID: 104679
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in connect_traces, at
dwarf2cfi.c:3071 since r12-6637-g463d9108766dcbb6
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104679
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104647
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |ICE in
|gfc_match_form
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104650
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104668
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104656
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jose E. Marchesi :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39be73d07bb667fd5d313a3398f5399e091f2c0c
commit r12-7373-g39be73d07bb667fd5d313a3398f5399e091f2c0c
Author: Jose E. Marchesi
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104680
Bug ID: 104680
Summary: identical inner condition not detected
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104680
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104679
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22271
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70508
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91777
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
Bug 87403 depends on bug 91777, which changed state.
Bug 91777 Summary: No warning for iterator going out of scope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91777
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92456
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tim.ruehsen at gmx dot
de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104468
--- Comment #6 from Erik Carstensen ---
thanks! Looks like the second change repairs __attribute__((optimize("O0")));
this leads to a smaller reproducer: the problem is reproduced if I remove that
attribute and compile with "-g -O0 -fvar-trackin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91514
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 91514, which changed state.
Bug 91514 Summary: optimization needs fictive memory allocation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91514
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104468
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDED&bug_status=WAITING&bug_status=REOPENED&cf_known_to_fail_type=allwords&cf_known_to_work_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58628
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-24
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56482
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84519
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:916b809fbfdd2740006270baf549bf22fe9ec3c4
commit r12-7377-g916b809fbfdd2740006270baf549bf22fe9ec3c4
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: We
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
